Native American and Children of Israel Fiery Flying Serpents

[_bomgeography]

Science is a wonderful thing

Yes. Sad you don't understand it. It cannot support the Book of Mormon is science tells you this DNA arrived well before the Book of Mormon was supposed to take place. Deal with the science.

DNA states a trans ocean voyage was made see map it disproves

current theories

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... DNA%29.PNG
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:48 pm
Posts: 390
They changed the first dating of Kennwick man by 3450 years. That same number used in the opposite direction from their very first dating falls well within the Book of Mormon timeline.

[_Lemmie]

Science is a wonderful thing

Yes. Sad you don't understand it. It cannot support the Book of Mormon is science tells you this DNA arrived well before the Book of Mormon was supposed to take place. Deal with the science.

DNA states a trans ocean voyage was made see map it disproves

current theories

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... DNA%29.PNG
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:48 pm
Posts: 390
They changed the first dating of Kennwick man by 3450 years. That same number used in the opposite direction from their very first dating falls well within the Book of Mormon timeline.

your post is nonsense.

[_bomgeography]

The idea that people from the Middle East migrated to the inhospitable arctic and travelled across a inhospitable barren sheet of ice is nonsense

[_Themis]

The idea that people from the Middle East migrated to the inhospitable arctic and travelled across a inhospitable barren sheet of ice is nonsense

So it would be nonsense to find that people migrated to the artic long ago and are called Inuit today. They live quite well on the ice, but according to you is nonsense.

[_Choyo Chagas]

The idea that people from the Middle East migrated to the inhospitable arctic and travelled across a inhospitable barren sheet of ice is nonsense

So it would be nonsense to find that people migrated to the artic long ago and are called Inuit today. They live quite well on the ice, but according to you is nonsense.

as the moon itself is nonsense
there are many, various explanations for the formation of the moon
none of them are proved, they are on the level of hypotheses by impotent science

: this means there is no orbiting moon around earth
- or -
the only valid explanation is Genesis 1:16. "And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."

[_bomgeography]

The idea that people from the Middle East migrated to the inhospitable arctic and travelled across a inhospitable barren sheet of ice is nonsense

So it would be nonsense to find that people migrated to the artic long ago and are called Inuit today. They live quite well on the ice, but according to you is nonsense.

Ya but the Inuit are not from the Middle East. DNA wise there DNA is located in that area do you find Inuit DNA in the Middle East or Africa

[_bomgeography]

Speaking of the Inuit I learned this about them

Although hgs A, B, C, D, and X are the five founding mtDNA haplogroups in the Americas, previous studies have shown the near-absence of hgs B, C, and X in Paleo-Eskimos and Thule, as well as among present-day Inuit (25, 43–47).”


DNA distribution is causing problems. Concerning the Bering barren ice bridge THEORY it was first believed there was one migration 50000 thousand years ago. Then it changed to three migrations about 20000 thousand years ago and now scientist believe that haplo group x crossed (for which there is no evidence for) 13000 years ago.

No they are adding more migrations than just three.

“Therefore, an additional Paleo-Eskimo migration wave should be added to the three-wave hypothesis in explaining the peopling of the Americas”

South America has Polynesian dna. So some scientist believe Polynesians sailed to South America. To say that they sailed to South America prior to 12000 bc would be absurd.

South America has Australian dna but there is no Australian DNA found in Asia or Siberia or the Near East.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-n ... 76/?no-ist

[_Themis]

Ya but the Inuit are not from the Middle East. DNA wise there DNA is located in that area do you find Inuit DNA in the Middle East or Africa

Their ancestors came out of the middle east. These migrations into the America's did not happen over night. They took centuries to thousands of years. Just because we don't understand well what route they came, we do know haplotype x in the America's is much older then Book of Mormon timelines. You even gave a link supporting it. Perhaps you should read those links first.

[_bomgeography]

Ya but the Inuit are not from the Middle East. DNA wise there DNA is located in that area do you find Inuit DNA in the Middle East or Africa

Their ancestors came out of the middle east. These migrations into the America's did not happen over night. They took centuries to thousands of years. Just because we don't understand well what route they came, we do know haplotype x in the America's is much older then Book of Mormon timelines. You even gave a link supporting it. Perhaps you should read those links first.

Your right that current theories believe these migrations took hundreds to thousands of years all the more reason for a footprint to be left behind but evidence of the supposed migration that took " hundreds to thousands of years " does not exist see map

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... DNA%29.PNG

[_Themis]

Your right that current theories believe these migrations took hundreds to thousands of years all the more reason for a footprint to be left behind but evidence of the supposed migration that took " hundreds to thousands of years " does not exist see map

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... DNA%29.PNG

Doesn't help you, and there are ways not to leave a DNA footprint like this. Some also think they may have arrived from Europe over 10000 years ago. We already Know haplotype X in the Americ's is over 10000 year old. Kennewick man shows how old it is, but you sill still ignore what I brought up, and you will not read your own links. You are not intellectually honest.