Question for bomgeography about the flood

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _bomgeography »

Given the evidence your right they should.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Maksutov »

bomgeography wrote:Given the evidence your right they should.


They must not think it's evidence. Convince them.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _bomgeography »

Eventually they will figure it out.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Themis »

bomgeography wrote:Eventually they will figure it out.


They did, but it just doesn't fit your interpretations which you admit are biased and not up for negotiation.
42
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Maksutov »

bomgeography wrote:Eventually they will figure it out.


This is part of the Great Commission. Are you listening to the voice of the Adversary, telling you to give up? Do you lack the faith, the heart, the courage? Or is it that you secretly know that your cause is hopeless but you can't come up with anything else to do with yourself? You don't have to put it on the line here. With peer review someone would accept or reject, not let you prattle on and say anything you please like we do here. :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _I have a question »

Themis wrote:
Maksutov wrote:Point me to the one where a PhD in anthropology, archaeology or history endorses the Hopewell equals Nephite theory. That should be easy. Don't be afraid.



If the evidence is so good these scientists should be saying the Hopewell's are a recent introduction into the Americas from the middle east.


Why haven't Church leaders come out and confirmed the Hopewell are in fact the Nephites/Lamanites?
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _bomgeography »

The church officially does not take a position on who the Nephites were
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _tapirrider »

bomgeography wrote:The church officially does not take a position on who the Nephites were


They used to in my youth. Now that all of this evidence that you claim exists, why do you suppose the church no longer takes a position?
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _bomgeography »

That's because in your youth it was meso America 2000 miles away from the hill Cumorah and found no evidence for it. The North American model has evidence and matches the Book of Mormon much better.

I was taught in seminary it took place in meso america
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _I have a question »

bomgeography wrote:The church officially does not take a position on who the Nephites were


I know that. I'm suggesting you think about why...
“When we are confronted with evidence that challenges our deeply held beliefs we are more likely to reframe the evidence than we are to alter our beliefs. We simply invent new reasons, new justifications, new explanations. Sometimes we ignore the evidence altogether.” (Mathew Syed 'Black Box Thinking')
Post Reply