bomgeography wrote:The doctors and psychologist and the researchers would disagree with your nonprofessional conclusion unless you are a reall DR. DR W
You are welcome to decide for yourself. I hold Ph.D. in neuroendocrinology from a leading medical school in the UK, served a post doc at MIT, and have published dozens of peer reviewed papers and two books in the field.
A good portion of my time over more than 20 years as a professional scientist was spent studying electromagnetic field effects on the brain. Nearly a year was spent full time as a consultant working on the problem of human cryo-preservation. This little misadventure included detailed study of the process of cell death in the brain and various perfusion techniques to be used immediately after death in an attempt to reduce freezing damage to brain cells during subsequent cryo-preservation procedures. (I came away from the latter experience convinced that this particular field is more religion than science.)
However, you needn't take my word for any of this. As Honorentheos suggested, perhaps you should read the articles you are citing (and indeed posts on the two threads) a bit more carefully, and then make sure you understand the terms being used and and procedures being described.
The problem here is yours. You fail to understand the difference between clinical death and brain death and what this means in terms of the significance (or lack thereof) of the findings reported.
Also, you might want think about why it is that no one here agrees with your personal conclusions and claims regarding these issues.
You also like to go by white supremacist nonsense written by Nazi pedophiles, so your bar is already set pretty low. Enjoy it.