Question for bomgeography about the flood

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_The CCC
_Emeritus
Posts: 6746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:51 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _The CCC »

Gunnar wrote:The fact that atheists can also subject themselves to self-delusion of various kinds does not help your case in the slightest, nor diminish the obviousness of the inherently self-delusionary character and intent of the referred to scriptures in The Book of Mormon. I sincerely maintain that I stopped believing in the truth claims of the LDS Church because I stopped deluding myself, and could no longer honestly or in good conscience overlook the damaging facts, contradictions and inconsistencies of those claims, and about the history of the Church--and even the abject absurdity of some of those claims.


We can all delude ourselves out of/into believing anything we want.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Themis »

The CCC wrote:
We can all delude ourselves out of/into believing anything we want.


Sure, but that doesn't put everyone on equal footing, or what they believe in.
42
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Maksutov »

Themis wrote:
The CCC wrote:
We can all delude ourselves out of/into believing anything we want.


Sure, but that doesn't put everyone on equal footing, or what they believe in.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_The CCC
_Emeritus
Posts: 6746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:51 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _The CCC »

Themis wrote:Sure, but that doesn't put everyone on equal footing, or what they believe in.


As far as believing something it pretty much does. If you let me believe any silly thing I want, I'm more than happy to let you believe any silly thing you want.

by the way I don't believe in science. I do however accept its results, until some better explanation comes along.
SEE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMXHKixqOM8
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Themis »

The CCC wrote:As far as believing something it pretty much does. If you let me believe any silly thing I want, I'm more than happy to let you believe any silly thing you want.


You can believe what ever you like, but each belief is not on equal footing. Some have lots of evidence supporting them, some have little, and some have lots of evidence against.
42
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Gunnar »

Themis wrote:
Gunnar wrote:It's remarkable that no matter how many times this is pointed out to them, it never fazes them, and they still manage to maintain the conviction that, in their particular case, those subjective feelings really are authentic manifestations or confirmation of divinely revealed truth.


It can also make them believe it more.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Backfire_effect

Unfortunately, yes. What a testament to human irrationality! I try hard to be on the lookout for any tendency to succumb to backfire effect myself. I think I am succeeding most of the time to avoid that tendency. I know there are once deeply held false beliefs that I have abandoned due to overwhelming contrary evidence.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Gunnar »

The CCC wrote:
Gunnar wrote:The fact that atheists can also subject themselves to self-delusion of various kinds does not help your case in the slightest, nor diminish the obviousness of the inherently self-delusionary character and intent of the referred to scriptures in The Book of Mormon. I sincerely maintain that I stopped believing in the truth claims of the LDS Church because I stopped deluding myself, and could no longer honestly or in good conscience overlook the damaging facts, contradictions and inconsistencies of those claims, and about the history of the Church--and even the abject absurdity of some of those claims.


We can all delude ourselves out of/into believing anything we want.

That is the danger we should all be constantly on guard against, and why we must school and discipline ourselves to give primary weight to good, hard evidence, and not subjective faith and feelings, which is the stock and trade of charlatanry -- especially religious charlatanry.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Themis »

Gunnar wrote:Unfortunately, yes. What a testament to human irrationality! I try hard to be on the lookout for any tendency to succumb to backfire effect myself. I think I am succeeding most of the time to avoid that tendency. I know there are once deeply held false beliefs that I have abandoned due to overwhelming contrary evidence.


I don't have a lot of important beliefs to cling to any more. At least not ones about Objective information about the universe. I don't need God to exist or not exist. I don't need Joseph Smith to have seen or not seen God.
42
_The CCC
_Emeritus
Posts: 6746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:51 am

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _The CCC »

Themis wrote:
You can believe what ever you like, but each belief is not on equal footing. Some have lots of evidence supporting them, some have little, and some have lots of evidence against.


I don't have a problem with belief. Evidence is a different discussion.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Question for bomgeography about the flood

Post by _Themis »

The CCC wrote:
Themis wrote:
You can believe what ever you like, but each belief is not on equal footing. Some have lots of evidence supporting them, some have little, and some have lots of evidence against.


I don't have a problem with belief. Evidence is a different discussion.


They should be very related, but you admit, for you, they are not. :razz:
42
Post Reply