Craig Paxton wrote:
Oh you heathens are all the same, What you are failing to take in to account is that his Bishop received a spiritual witness from God to have this man called as his counselor.
He may have. He may not have. If he did, then it goes to show...and not for the first time in history...that God calls upon the weak things of the world in order to accomplish His purposes. If, as the first article seems to be saying, the fellow may not have been in the Bishopric at the time of his misbehavior then it might be that the calling brought him to a position/place of being 'outed'. That's a good thing. As long, of course, as he hasn't been misbehaving in the meantime. It's hard to know all of the variables/factors involved. The fact is, it's good that he was caught and that he now has a chance to repent of his past misbehaviors.
Craig Paxton wrote:God had obviously already taken this man's pedophilia history into account prior to sending that special witness to the Bishop.
That's a possibility, if indeed the counselor was called through direct inspiration/revelation. That doesn't always happen, I would guess. But again, if he was called through inspiration, it might be that God...knowing the end from the beginning...knew how things were going to pan out. And the fact is, this man now has been brought to justice and also has an opportunity to repent. Not to say that there hasn't been damage done along the way.
Craig Paxton wrote:Back off this special man...he was called by the Mormon God through revelation and inspiration...
I know I'm repeating myself here, but the fact is...he may have been...or he may not have been.
Craig Paxton wrote:...and we all know that you can trust a spiritual witness to only confirm what God wants us to know is true...
That makes sense. But the question remains...how MUCH does God "want us to know"? I don't think that God is under any obligation to fully disclose anything to us.
That would take all the fun out of living. I think we need to struggle a bit.

Craig Paxton wrote:...cuz God does not lie.
I think we can agree on this.
Regards,
MG