Earth to moron, this has been explained to you several times already. The FBI wasn't denied access. The FBI rarely ever needs direct access, and they typically don't request it because it damages the evidence. For this reason using third party images of hard drives is the norm and is perfectly sufficient. For you to sit there and suggest otherwise proves you don't know crap about computers.
Holy hell this president is dumb. After bending over backwards trying to convince Americans, including his own people, that he really does accept the findings of our intelligence, and he really does respect and have the utmost confidence in them... today he says Russia isn't targeting us anymore!
Earth to moron, this has been explained to you several times already. The FBI wasn't denied access. The FBI rarely ever needs direct access, and they typically don't request it because it damages the evidence. For this reason using third party images of hard drives is the norm and is perfectly sufficient. For you to sit there and suggest otherwise proves you don't know crap about computers.
Fact: FBI prefers direct access. Fact: FBI requested direct access to DNC servers. Fact: DNC denied FBI direct access to DNC servers.
These facts have been documented in countless media reports and in the transcripts of Comey's Congressional testimony.
And your rebuttal is "EA says that didn't happen". moronic indeed.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
As much as you'd like to describe "Zerohedge" as a "major news source," subs, what you are misrepresenting is the description of what occurred. The FBI requesting something, receiving a counter-offer, and accepting that offer is not the same thing as the DNC not allowing access. Have fun continuing on this point, though. We haven't heard with what InfoWars or Gateway Pundit has to say yet.
Trumptards still whining about Hillary's emails? How is that investigation going? Is she locked up yet?
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die." - Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
Jersey Girl wrote:"President Putin was extremely powerful and strong in his denial today."...are we sure he's not just flattering him to keep his enemies near?
I mean besides the fact that Trump can't explain his way out of a paper bag.
This is closer than Harry Dexter White and the Silverman group.
Jersey Girl wrote:"President Putin was extremely powerful and strong in his denial today."...are we sure he's not just flattering him to keep his enemies near?
Yes.
Putin just isn’t that stupid.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
moksha wrote:Can you spot the lies? I can spot three of them, possibly a fourth if I didn't believe this would be enough to fool Republicans.
Mr. Trump said the misunderstanding arose from his use of a “double negative.”
“The sentence should have been ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’ sort of a double negative,” he said. “So you can put that in and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself. I have on numerous occasions noted our intelligence findings that Russians attempted to interfere in our elections.”
I don't know if I can spot three lies. I can darn sure spot the biggest lie.
The lies:
1. That Trump meant to say wouldn't instead of would. 2. That it clarifies things. It is actually meant as a coverup. 3. That Trump has said on numerous occasions that Russians attempted to interfere with our elections. He had continually denied it.
