schreech wrote:feel free to show us
LOL, okay.
What if women went on a sex strike before the midterms?
If this isn't related to the midterms, uh, why does the author title her piece this way?
...women who were distressed because they didn't feel desire for their husbands or long-term partners. Wanting to keep their men happy, these women often had sex anyway, with a resigned attitude and little thought to their own pleasure...
Women aren't satisfied, apparently. Why?
But regular service sex is something else -- an arguably destructive habit fostered by specific social conditions, a symptom that something is amiss in not just our sex lives, but in our larger lives, and the culture more generally.
Oh, because women are upset by things which have nothing to do with sex itself, apparently.
It's time for a revolution. At the polls, and in the bedroom. And in our understanding of who women are, sexually and otherwise. Given the tight interweaving of economic and political power with sexual entitlement, female sexual autonomy has never been more urgent, and women's sexual pleasure has never been more political. Let's consider what it might mean to go on a sex strike of sorts -- to get what we want, rather than give what we think we owe others.
Do I need to translate this for you? The author literally says sex is interweaved with political power. To get what "we" want. And what is it "we" want?
Sex and status are linked. Where men have the tightest grip on resources and power, our society (including the women in their lives) will prioritize their pleasure -- and create false narratives about what women deserve, sexually and otherwise.
...
[SCREED ABOUT WOMEN'S EQUALITY]
A women's sex strike against service sex, a refusal to do it out of a sense of obligation, would force us to confront these basic inequalities. Our current administration has amped up the notion that women are mere extensions of male will and pleasure, there to serve at every turn....And female pleasure is irrelevant, even pathological, if it exists at all....Some women under the current administration may be fine with this paradigm, but they are fundamentally yoked to male desires and agendas, never to exist outside or without them.
^^^Trump Derangement Syndrome. I mean she's clearly telling women to go on a sex strike before a midterm in order to manipulate men for political gains. She doesn't give the name, but I wonder what political party that's intended to help? Gee, I have no idea.
