"National Emergency" it is!

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Kevin Graham »

She objected to a wall on moral grounds. She never said a huge metal fence 30 ft tall was any less immoral. I know Trump has waffled on what constitutes a "wall" but I've seen no indication the Democrats have. I think it would be a huge mistake to give him a win right now after he just lost this game of poker.
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _ajax18 »

Kevin Graham wrote:She objected to a wall on moral grounds. She never said a huge metal fence 30 ft tall was any less immoral. I know Trump has waffled on what constitutes a "wall" but I've seen no indication the Democrats have. I think it would be a huge mistake to give him a win right now after he just lost this game of poker.


It would be bad for your business that depends the uninhibited flow of illegal immigrant labor willing to work for less and under the table for you. It will also postpone your dream of making Georgia Venezuela del norte by importing latin american socialist voters.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Res Ipsa »

ajax18 wrote:
Of course Democrats will agree to fund some additional physical barrier. The Democrats want things on immigration, too. Horse trading is how this works.


That sounds encouraging. But Mark Levin points out that in 1986 2.3 million illegal immigrants were given amnesty in exchange for a border fence. They got their amnesty and the fence never got funded. I have a hard time believing it will actually get done unless the president uses executive privileges.


I don’t think Levin’s correct. I can’t find any reference to fences or barriers in connection with the ‘86 immigration reform. There was a call for more officers that wasn’t funded until later. Fences were legislated years later.

All Trump has to do is make sure the legislation that implements the deal includes funding.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Kevin Graham »

ajax18 wrote:That sounds encouraging. But Mark Levin points out that in 1986 2.3 million illegal immigrants were given amnesty in exchange for a border fence. They got their amnesty and the fence never got funded. I have a hard time believing it will actually get done unless the president uses executive privileges.


Levin, a FOX stooge, is full of crap.

Did Ronald Reagan Try for Eight Years to Build a Border Wall?

Ronald Reagan thought a Mexican border wall was a terrible idea
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Kevin Graham wrote:She objected to a wall on moral grounds. She never said a huge metal fence 30 ft tall was any less immoral. I know Trump has waffled on what constitutes a "wall" but I've seen no indication the Democrats have. I think it would be a huge mistake to give him a win right now after he just lost this game of poker.


Hmm, we’ve got over 500 miles of tall fencing in place now. Is she gonna introduce a bill to remove it because it’s immoral? Mr. Trump! Tear down that wall!! If she really thought it was immoral, wouldn’t she do that?

The thing is, she never said what she meant by “wall”, so she’s free to use any of Trump’s definitions. That gives both of them an opportunity to portray themselves as winners. And that’s how crap gets done.

You want the dreamers to be able to become citizens? You gonna sacrifice them to avoid Trump getting a win? When you control only one house, to get anything done, you gotta make a deal.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Take a few minutes and go back and read all of the different things Trump said about the wall during the campaign. Sometimes it’s a wall, sometimes it’s a fence. Sometimes it’s concrete, sometimes it’s steel. Sometime it spans the entire border, sometimes it’s only 1000 miles because of natural barriers.

That leaves both Trump and Pelosi room to maneuver. If she agrees to additional fencing, she can say she didn’t give Trump a wall. At the same time, he can say he got a wall. He even tipped his hand to this in the rose garden speech today.



Today he talked about a smart wall.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Res Ipsa wrote:
Take a few minutes and go back and read all of the different things Trump said about the wall during the campaign. Sometimes it’s a wall, sometimes it’s a fence. Sometimes it’s concrete, sometimes it’s steel. Sometime it spans the entire border, sometimes it’s only 1000 miles because of natural barriers.

That leaves both Trump and Pelosi room to maneuver. If she agrees to additional fencing, she can say she didn’t give Trump a wall. At the same time, he can say he got a wall. He even tipped his hand to this in the rose garden speech today.



Today he talked about a smart wall.


No way! You wouldn’t kid a guy about a thing like that....
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Jersey Girl »

No idea why you said that.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Kevin Graham »

ajax18 wrote:It would be bad for your business that depends the uninhibited flow of illegal immigrant labor willing to work for less and under the table for you. It will also postpone your dream of making Georgia Venezuela del norte by importing latin american socialist voters.


1. You're a failed business owner who blames brown people for your inability to make a living selling eye glasses.

2. I more than quadrupled my personal wealth within 15 years, half of which was created in a "socialist" third world country.

3. You're an idiot, and human garbage who keeps blaming illegal immigration for things they have nothing to do with. They're far more humble, moral, law abiding and hard working than you and your ilk. That's why you hate them.
Last edited by YahooSeeker [Bot] on Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: "National Emergency" it is!

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Kevin Graham wrote:She objected to a wall on moral grounds. She never said a huge metal fence 30 ft tall was any less immoral. I know Trump has waffled on what constitutes a "wall" but I've seen no indication the Democrats have. I think it would be a huge mistake to give him a win right now after he just lost this game of poker.


Hmm, we’ve got over 500 miles of tall fencing in place now. Is she gonna introduce a bill to remove it because it’s immoral? Mr. Trump! Tear down that wall!! If she really thought it was immoral, wouldn’t she do that?

The thing is, she never said what she meant by “wall”, so she’s free to use any of Trump’s definitions. That gives both of them an opportunity to portray themselves as winners. And that’s how ____ gets done.

You want the dreamers to be able to become citizens? You gonna sacrifice them to avoid Trump getting a win? When you control only one house, to get anything done, you gotta make a deal.


So now you're cool with negotiating after Trump takes the dreamers as hostages? What's the difference between that and federal workers getting pay? I'm not certain Trump would ever in a million years give DACA kids a path to citizenship. We saw how Stephen Miller talked him out of that during his first year in office. It would make people like ajax want to go off themselves.
Last edited by YahooSeeker [Bot] on Fri Jan 25, 2019 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply