Vanessa Tyson: Abandoned by Kavanaugh haters on Left

[_Bach]

Why does this happen so soon by the liberals? Don’t have time to post a ten page paper as EA, KG, Jersey Girl and et al have done defending Lazy Ford. The mindless, unemployed(IMHO) liberals loved to POUNCE on Kavanaugh for acts against the idiocy of Ford when she was rebuked by anyone who knew her.

So where are these same “supposed” champions of women when it comes to Fairfax.

This group here on this board is the epitamy of hypocrisy!

EA, SHADES, Jersey Girl, KG, ????

No comment at all.

DEFINES THIS BOARD!

(Shades, does this get posted or have you come up w a new rule against logic?)

[_Dr. Shades]

Your premise is flawed, because Vanessa Tyson was never abandoned by Kavanaugh haters on the left.

(By the way: Blanket insults like "the group here on this board" will get your post torpedoed in the queue in the future.)

[_canpakes]

bach, isn't this where you tell us that you just had dinner last night with Vanessa, in a country club that you reserved for only yourselves that's owned by a dead NFL team owner whose name you cannot correctly spell?

[_Bach]

(By the way: Blanket insults like "the group here on this board" will get your post torpedoed in the queue in the future.)

FIRST: Your reading comprehension is lacking. “This group here on this board” was specific to the three posters referenced in the second sentence of my OP: specifically EA, KG and Jersey Girl, those who lived there life defending Ford’s accusations! Relevant content for the topic.

SECOND: Why don’t you ever threaten your lunch buddy KG for the vile he spews here on YOUR BOARD? Just admit - “bias” is your only answer.

CONCLUSION: It’s a whole lot easier for your bias to “torpedo” a thread of an opposing view than to “torpedo” an obvious lack of reading comprehension!

Like I’ve said, your board, your bias and now your public demonstration of reading skills.

(Have now doubt your other lunch buddy will not allow this post even if it complies with YOUR rules!)

[_Dr. Shades]

FIRST: Your reading comprehension is lacking. “This group here on this board” was specific to the three posters referenced in the second sentence of my OP: specifically EAllusion, KG and Jersey Girl, those who lived there life defending Ford’s accusations! Relevant content for the topic.

O.K.

SECOND: Why don’t you ever threaten your lunch buddy KG for the vile he spews here on YOUR BOARD? Just admit - “bias” is your only answer.

KEVIN: Please refrain from making personal attacks or calling people names here in the Spirit Paradise forum. Rule of thumb: Address the text of the posts, not the person who makes them.

[_Jersey Girl]

FIRST: Your reading comprehension is lacking. “This group here on this board” was specific to the three posters referenced in the second sentence of my OP: specifically EAllusion, KG and Jersey Girl, those who lived there life defending Ford’s accusations! Relevant content for the topic.

SECOND: Why don’t you ever threaten your lunch buddy KG for the vile he spews here on YOUR BOARD? Just admit - “bias” is your only answer.

KEVIN: Please refrain from making personal attacks or calling people names here in the Spirit Paradise forum. Rule of thumb: Address the text of the posts, not the person who makes them.

Doesn't that same rule of thumb that I bolded apply to Bach? I'm mentioned in the OP about something that, to my knowledge, I've never posted about on this board and this certainly isn't the first time he's misrepresented me without evidence.

[_Bach]

Doesn't that same rule of thumb that I bolded apply to Bach? I'm mentioned in the OP about something that, to my knowledge, I've never posted about on this board and this certainly isn't the first time he's misrepresented me without evidence.

No, you earned your mention in my OP. It’s a thread about the disgusting hypocrisy of your positions. You EMBRACE WOMEN WHO REFER TO OTHER WOMEN AS A “C-WORD”! Are you now denying such disgusting comment?

And yet you, AND ESPECIALLY YOU, won’t denounce this Tyson accused.

You, like Shades, are short on comprehension and memory!

BoHoo Bword? Don’t know but documented history you can’t run from.

Please don’t derail this thread.

Get up from your screen/keyboard, think and respond. And perhaps find other things to do than posting all day (you do have a ridiculously high volume) and check out life.

[NOTE FOR EA: SHADES HAS APPROVED POSTING HISTORY IS ALLOWED]

[_canpakes]

No, you earned your mention in my OP. It’s a thread about the disgusting hypocrisy of your positions. You EMBRACE WOMEN WHO REFER TO OTHER WOMEN AS A “C-WORD”! Are you now denying such disgusting comment?

And yet you, AND ESPECIALLY YOU, won’t denounce this Tyson accused.

You, like Shades, are short on comprehension and memory!

BoHoo Bword? Don’t know but documented history you can’t run from.

Please don’t derail this thread.

Get up from your screen/keyboard, think and respond. And perhaps find other things to do than posting all day (you do have a ridiculously high volume) and check out life.

[NOTE FOR EA: SHADES HAS APPROVED POSTING HISTORY IS ALLOWED]

Geez, are you an angry drunk, or what? Put that bottle of Boone's Farm down, already.

[_Jersey Girl]

FIRST: Your reading comprehension is lacking. “This group here on this board” was specific to the three posters referenced in the second sentence of my OP: specifically EAllusion, KG and Jersey Girl, those who lived there life defending Ford’s accusations! Relevant content for the topic.

O.K.

There's nothing wrong with your reading comprehension. Here is the phrase that was used.

EA, KG, Jersey Girl and et al

Additionally, the poster's posts are littered with personal attacks, discouraging posters from posting, essentially de-inviting them, odd forms of harassment, basically more weird stalking behaviors, and these types of posts are making it through the queue? Am I missing something here?

[_Bach]

Would love to respond to you Jersey Girl. Unfortunately shades and EA are preventing me from doing so without explaining why.

[Shades, EA, what rules does this response violate here in Moscow?]