
Pop some sweet kicks:

Fresh skins:

Get dat Cristal:

Yo, you be swimmin' in dat honey, bruh.
- Doc
EAllusion wrote:"Game" doesn't ordinarily mean solid interpersonal skills that allow a person to develop meaningful relationships. It means seduction kills with a heavy connotation towards manipulation. The PUA crowd didn't invent the term or create a new meaning for it. They just borrowed it. Maybe you're running sick game by, uh, meeting women with mutual interests and cultivating friendship, but that ain't what people think of when they read your words.
EAllusion wrote:Of the books you recommended, the one I have read is Strauss's. I stand by my position that it's a bad book in general as an inspiration to find romantic partners or cure loneliness and it is a terrible idea to recommend it to DT with his particular foibles on display.
Analytics wrote:The top definition of "game" at Urban Dictionary is:
"It's CONFIDENTLY using your attributes, characteristics, and overall personality to win the affection of the woman you want. You can't have game if you don't know yourself; you can't be confident in what you're ignorant of.
Game is playing the cards you're dealt and WINNING; turning your positives into swagger (not 'swag') and your negatives into charm."
I wish you would evaluate the post in the context of everything I said. My main advice was in the four books you didn't read, not the book I mentioned as an afterthought.
Here is a quote from the end of the book that I dare not name and that nobody should ever read, especially DT:
EAllusion wrote: You managed to turn that into something vaguely creepy where you announce on a message board that you like ''em young.
EAllusion wrote:Sure, physical attractiveness is something both men and women look for in a partner. It's not a coincidence that couples' attractiveness tend to approximately line up. Is it healthy to make finding a person you regard as "beautiful" a deal-breaking focus of having a relationship while you also talk about inability to meet people? No, not at all.
Res Ipsa wrote: It depends. Do you want to go to a bar? Do you enjoy going to a bar? Are you comfortable in a bar?
Res Ipsa wrote: Personally, if I wanted to meet and talk to a woman, I wouldn't go to a bar for that. In my experience, most bars where singles go to mingle have loud music that isn't conducive to meeting and holding a conversation with someone. In fact, in all of my 60 odd years (and yes, they were all odd), I don't think I ever met a woman in a bar that I attempted to pursue any kind of relationship with. The women with whom I ended up having a romantic relationship with I first met through school, work, or theater productions.
For me, the easiest way to meet people is through groups. I belong to a walking club. Most of the members are women. We do lots of talking as we walk. I boardgame frequently. I've become friends with several women over the past few years hanging out at a game pub, playing games with whoever is around, being introduced to other boardgames, being invited to boardgames at people's homes, etc. I also hike, and have met any number of women over the years on trails and talked with them while hiking.
But I don't do any of those things specifically to meet women. I do them because I like to do them. And some of the people who also like to do them happen to be women. Figure out activities or hobbies that you enjoy. Or better yet, activities or hobbies you've never tried. Look for groups of people to do those things with. You have an automatic thing to strike up a conversation about: the thing you are doing.Res Ipsa wrote: you'd be surprised at how many of them are lonely.DoubtingThomas wrote: So far no luck on dating apps.
I wouldn't expect a woman on a dating app to express to complete strangers that they are lonely. My last date as a single guy was pre-app. But I suspect that people don't present an image of who they really are on a dating app. They present a picture that they think will be appealing to a potential romantic partner. That's one of the advantages of meeting people through groups and trying to develop friendships. People can be more of who they are at, say, bowling league, than when describing themselves in a dating app.Res Ipsa wrote:What's a little frustrating for me is that DT seems to me to be teaching himself to be a helpless victim. He needs a girlfriend to be happy, but then actively searches for obstacles that prevent him from getting a girlfriend. It almost seems like trying to make helpful suggestions actually just enables his helplessness.Doubting Thomas wrote:I am all stressed out from work.
Okay. Why is that an obstacle to meeting people? You can tackle managing your stress and then go and meet people. Or recognize that being stressed out is part of the modern human condition and get out and meet people like people under stress manage to do.Doubting Thomas wrote: I simply want to enjoy life.
I want to enjoy life, too. But sometimes doing that is anything but simple. What is it that is keeping you from enjoying life? Once you figure out what that obstacle is, make a plan to remove the obstacle or find a way around the obstacle to get to happy? You have far more power over your situation than you are letting yourself see.Doubting Thomas wrote:I have no life in our meaningless universe.
Welcome to the existential crisis. It takes some getting used to the notion that the universe has no meaning. But lots of us do. I'm comfortable with it. I don't feel any need for something outside of myself to provide meaning to my life. You ever listen to Tim Minchin's "Storm?" When he gets to "Isn't this enough?" I can honestly answer "yes."
Crisis aside, yes, you have a life. Isn't the problem really that you don't have the life you want? What do you want that you don't have? Once you know what it is, figure out what is keeping you from getting it. Once you've identified the obstacle, don't dwell on the obstacle. Figure out how to remove it. Or go around it by finding happiness some other way. Or change your thinking about what being happy actually means.Doubting Thomas wrote: If you know of someone using a dating app willing to do some long distance dating let me know.
I don't know anyone who is using a dating app, because I never ask. None of my business. Matchmaking isn't my thing. I did it once unintentionally and it worked out great. With that success under my belt, I promptly retired.
And you really should seriously consider Jersey Girl's advice about the therapist/life coach. I think you'd be pleasantly surprised.
DoubtingThomas wrote:EAllusion wrote: You managed to turn that into something vaguely creepy where you announce on a message board that you like ''em young.
To be honest I am afraid of STDs. It is riskier to date women in their mid-20s according to the second chart "People Living With Diagnosed HIV by Age, 2015, United States". According to the data it would be wiser and safer for me to date a girl in her late teens or early 20s. I can use a condom, but it wouldn't protect me much from diseases like syphilis or HPV.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/older ... index.html
Incidence and prevalence estimates suggest that young people aged 15–24 years acquire half of all new STDs1 and that one in four sexually active adolescent females has an STD, such as chlamydia or human papillomavirus (HPV).2
Compared with older adults, sexually active adolescents aged 15–19 years and young adults aged 20–24 years are at higher risk of acquiring STDs for a combination of behavioral, biological, and cultural reasons.
https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/adolescents.htm
So should I date a woman that I am not physically attracted to?
Lemmie wrote: Nope.