SteelHead wrote:Peel away the biocentrism smoke screen and embrace the Intelligent Design.
Totally. But, if you cannot see the intelligence in the design. . . . . keep looking. It's there, and it's awesome.
SteelHead wrote:Peel away the biocentrism smoke screen and embrace the Intelligent Design.
SPG wrote:[...]Humans are more closely related to dolphins in terms of internal body function then we are to primates. [...]
Doctor Steuss wrote:SPG wrote:[...]Humans are more closely related to dolphins in terms of internal body function then we are to primates. [...]
Do you mind expanding on what you mean by this?
SPG wrote:SteelHead wrote:Peel away the biocentrism smoke screen and embrace the Intelligent Design.
Totally. But, if you cannot see the intelligence in the design. . . . . keep looking. It's there, and it's awesome.
moksha wrote:I think he means that high pitched sound both humans and dolphins make when they want someone to throw them a fish.
subgenius wrote:Clearly, as evidenced by many of your posts, he means the blow hole.
Doctor Steuss wrote:SPG wrote:[...]Humans are more closely related to dolphins in terms of internal body function then we are to primates. [...]
Do you mind expanding on what you mean by this?
As dolphins have a multi-chamber stomach, reniculate kidneys, a retia mirabilia, and a separated trachea and esophagus (just to name a few things), I believe I am misunderstanding your statement.
Doctor Steuss wrote:SPG wrote:[...]Humans are more closely related to dolphins in terms of internal body function then we are to primates. [...]
Do you mind expanding on what you mean by this?
As dolphins have a multi-chamber stomach, reniculate kidneys, a retia mirabilia, and a separated trachea and esophagus (just to name a few things), I believe I am misunderstanding your statement.
SPG wrote:And one doctor who recorded the hand of what looked like a human/fish being on the glass of his sub. He was convinced, for other reasons, it was a merfolk.
canpakes wrote:Totally. But, if you cannot see the intelligence in the design. . . . . keep looking. It's there, and it's awesome.
It would be much more awesome and logical if we processsed food with 100% energy efficiency and had no need to excrete waste. Or simply extracted our needs from our immediate surroundings. Or were structured as one large superorganism possessing all of our functions without need for organ specialization or individual discrete cells. Or never had hiccups.
Seriously, why is our current design so ‘intelligent’?
DrW wrote:I looked more closely into the provenance of the video, which If I recall correctly, also had sequences of one of these "creatures" sitting on a dock and diving into the water when it felt it was being observed. If you had a bit more skepticism and curiosity, you could have found the information admitting this video was a elaborate hoax.
If it would have been real, it would still be in re-runs.