Gunnar wrote:It is blazingly clear to any objective observer familiar with Ajax's posting history that willful dishonesty and ignorance and virulent racism are his most prominent characteristics. I don't think this is even controversial. As far as racism is concerned, he really doesn't seem to dispute that himself or seem the slightest bit apologetic about it. Rather, if anything, he actually seems proud of that and to regard it as one of his chief virtues!
Yep, and you can switch out ajax for Doc and racism for women-hating and that post would be just as true.
because semantics is so relevant here, ok ya douche - but notice how you're the one still putting that meaningless stat of the 2016 popular vote on your pillow at night.
When a candidate isn't good enough to convince the majority of the people to vote for them, they might need the assistance of an electoral affirmative action program to make it into office. That's our Trump.
subgenius wrote:because semantics is so relevant here, ok ya douche - but notice how you're the one still putting that meaningless stat of the 2016 popular vote on your pillow at night.
When a candidate isn't good enough to convince the majority of the people to vote for them, they might need the assistance of an electoral affirmative action program to make it into office. That's our Trump.
In 1860 more people voted for not-Lincoln than for Lincoln. Cool how you're not even smarter than rebellious land owners of 1776.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
canpakes wrote:When a candidate isn't good enough to convince the majority of the people to vote for them, they might need the assistance of an electoral affirmative action program to make it into office. That's our Trump.
In 1860 more people voted for not-Lincoln than for Lincoln. Cool how you're not even smarter than rebellious land owners of 1776.
(italics mine)
Cool how you think mendacity Trump's facts.
Lincoln received a greater number of cast votes than any of the other three candidates in that election.
Gunnar wrote:It is blazingly clear to any objective observer familiar with Ajax's posting history that willful dishonesty and ignorance and virulent racism are his most prominent characteristics. I don't think this is even controversial. As far as racism is concerned, he really doesn't seem to dispute that himself or seem the slightest bit apologetic about it. Rather, if anything, he actually seems proud of that and to regard it as one of his chief virtues!
Yep, and you can switch out ajax for Doc and racism for women-hating and that post would be just as true.
Aren't you the cuckold who went on a racist and sexist tirade against a black woman, and hires Hispanics under the table so you can get away with paying them cheaply and without health insurance? Wake me up when you grow some morality.
- Doc
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Aren't you the cuckold who went on a racist and sexist tirade against a black woman, and hires Hispanics under the table so you can get away with paying them cheaply and without health insurance? Wake me up when you grow some morality. - Doc
No, I'm the guy who has never been arrested for assaulting women. I'm also the guy who doesn't call women I don't know whores, whether they're going through chemo or not. That means I'm light years ahead of you on the morality spectrum. But being more moral than someone like you really isn't much to brag about.
Perfume on my Mind wrote:I can't help a suspicion, however, that the way they talk to me about Trump is different than how they talk about him to other Republican voters.
You could always do an experiment with some conservative that does not know you. Shake their hand then lean in close and whisper into their ear, "Hail Hydra". Then ask them how they feel about Trump.
canpakes wrote: Cool how you think mendacity Trump's facts.
Lincoln received a greater number of cast votes than any of the other three candidates in that election.
you wrote "majority of the people to vote for them" - which was not the case for Lincoln in his 1860 election victory. This is actually true...but feel free to now place goalposts within your own range.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
canpakes wrote: Cool how you think mendacity Trump's facts.
Lincoln received a greater number of cast votes than any of the other three candidates in that election.
you wrote "majority of the people to vote for them" - which was not the case for Lincoln in his 1860 election victory. This is actually true...but feel free to now place goalposts within your own range.
No need to move any goalposts; you just need to use a dictionary more often. Look up the word, majority.