Gadianton wrote:Read this very carefully, DT. I do not think you want to be in a relationship (my best guess) including a relationship of the parameters you set forth, with an attractive 18 year old.
I would prefer 18 to 22, but it is not a requirement. I am kind of dating a 46 year old woman. I have to go. Can't reply.
I would prefer 18 to 22, but it is not a requirement. I am kind of dating a 46 year old woman. I have to go. Can't reply.
Fine, but when you get back, you owe a response. I want to know why I should believe you want a relationship with an 18-22 year old anymore than the kid smoking pot wants a million dollars (presumably to float an easy life of pot smoking)?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
canpakes wrote:DT, since you insist on keeping this thread going - what was the nature of your relationship with the 46 year old woman? What did the two of you do?
Yea we are still going out. Nothing happened, so far.
What does, “nothing happened”, mean? Do the two of you meet, then stand across the room from each other and not interact?
canpakes wrote:What does, “nothing happened”, mean? Do the two of you meet, then stand across the room from each other and not interact?
Is Cinemax not included in your cable bundle? Maybe you missed Band Camp 4? It's really sad these things need to be explained.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
huckelberry wrote:Doubting Thomas , you have posted a bunch of evolutionary and biological observations to excuse your problem. In terms of evolution our forefathers and mothers some ten million years ago started increasing the amount we use our brains to invent better ways of doing things instead of relying as completely on past instinct programing.
I suggest you follow that new program.
Understanding evolution can help us solve many problems. Evolutionary biology can help predict human behavior and statistics confirms it.
That is why I made reference to the largest evolutionary developments in the last ten million years. Humans are not locked into a pattern but invent new ways of doing things.Humans invent culture to modify their instincts and use their mind to build friendships with others.
Friendship requires avoiding phoniness. You have mentioned wanting to maintain good image with your LDS bishop while planing to find sex without commitment with someone fitting your fantasy which you justify by referencing primate biological patterns. Since when is that ok LDS behavior?
Gadianton wrote: Do you drive a cherry-red convertible and hang out at Starbucks or across the street from the local high school? Why not? Do you go roller skating? theme parks? classes at a junior college? (you could use a few humanities courses). Do you stop and gab with young girls while grocery shopping? respond to a dozen personal adds a day? Do you wear a gold chain and go to movies alone and offer to buy chicks popcorn and joke around with them in line? If not, why not? Because you don't really want it. Hell, this thread is titled "Go to a bar?!!" What a freaking joke, since only an old hen of 21 can even get in! Did you mean a family bar, where an 18-year-old might be there with mom and dad?
You are right. I don't know what I really want at this point.
Gadianton wrote:The kid smoking pot who thinks he wants a million dollars might come to find the thing he really does want, and that gets him in the right direction where it's possible to be happier.
