honorentheos wrote:Subbie, what effect do you believe said dark money loopholes have, if you agree they exist at all?
This is likely a difficult question for him, given his posts in this thread. I don’t think he’ll be able to answer it. ; )
honorentheos wrote:Subbie, what effect do you believe said dark money loopholes have, if you agree they exist at all?
honorentheos wrote:Subbie, what effect do you believe said dark money loopholes have, if you agree they exist at all?
canpakes wrote:
subgenius wrote:honorentheos wrote:Subbie, what effect do you believe said dark money loopholes have, if you agree they exist at all?
So, admittedly I wrote in the OP:
"So Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez promotes that we should all live within our means...and for her, a former bartender, her new salary of $145k is not enough means...at least not enough means to keep her honest. So, has she and the fresh class of liberal darlings finally exposed their true inadequacies? Shall we season with another liberal darling's tax fraud and campaign finance violations? Or is there another perspective here?"
So, while my questions in context and pertaining to actual facts on hand are ignored, you would prefer we take a longer route around the barn to the woodshed
1. While I am familiar with 'dark money', I am unaware of what a dark money loophole is or if it exists - but I am pretty sure that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez considers them real and is using them as hostages for a salary bump.
2. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez using "loophole" implies that there is some sort of law at play, but i am unaware of the law she is referencing - but such a notion provides possibility for criminal activity with regards to the sworn oath of office and duties for a US Representative.
subgenius wrote:(insert pic of adorable kids)
Wow. No wonder you don't understand her post. You couldn't bring enough understanding to the table to do the most basic unpacking needed to actually engage it at face value.
honorentheos wrote:What you wrote above is just you making up stuff. It doesn't actually interface with what she said. It seems entirely composed of right-wing media confabulations regarding Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
honorentheos wrote:So, while my questions in context and pertaining to actual facts on hand are ignored, you would prefer we take a longer route around the barn to the woodshed
Meaning it pulls you back to what she actually said rather than your made-up BS? ok, whatever it takes to get you there I guess.
honorentheos wrote:1. While I am familiar with 'dark money', I am unaware of what a dark money loophole is or if it exists - but I am pretty sure that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez considers them real and is using them as hostages for a salary bump.
2. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez using "loophole" implies that there is some sort of law at play, but i am unaware of the law she is referencing - but such a notion provides possibility for criminal activity with regards to the sworn oath of office and duties for a US Representative.
Wow. No wonder you don't understand her post. You couldn't bring enough understanding to the table to do the most basic unpacking needed to actually engage it at face value.
Enjoy your right-wing made-up BS, subbie. Apparently it's all you've got.
subgenius wrote:.....so, to you, dark money loopholes have nothing to do with honesty/dishonesty?