Impeachment hearings

[_canpakes]

It is so far, at least that I have found...what is your full answer then?

Thanks

Hey, Markk -

Given your inability to answer why Trump did not engage the DoJ in pursuing corruption that you claim he was sure existed because “he was sure that it existed”, then why would Trump need to ask Zelensky to look into any corruption claim, or make a public announcement about same?

After all, there would be no need to ask Zelensky to do anything, either, right?

[_Markk]

1. Why didn’t Trump have the DoJ investigate the Bidens, if he believed that they were dirty?

2. Why ask the leader of a foreign nation, instead, to publicly announce ‘investigations’?

Still, you’ve given no evidence that the Bidens were ‘dirty’. Claims against the ownership of Burisma do not equate to proof of anything illegal by any Biden.

I have given plenty of evidence that Trump, myself and others believe they were dirty, and that there is evidence that merits and investigation...like why was Hunter Biden and his associates paid millions by a know criminal who is accused of stealing millions from the Ukrainian goverment, and is now on the run , living in Monaco where much of the stolen money is thought to be in hidden offshore accounts.

Why did Hunter's business partner visit his father, Joe, at the white house after money from Burisma was wired to Hunter's, Archers and John Kerry's son, business account. And that this was right before Joe was going to the Ukraine, and then both Archer and Hunter were hired by this Criminal Boss to work for his company.

This is just part of the evidence I have given here...and it more than warrants and investigation in my opinion, and obviously to Trump...Please tell me why this evidence alone does not warrant and investigation. Personally I believe it demands a investigation, and again answering the mystery question one more time ...Trump had/has every right to do what he did in asking for an investigation...and currently the DoJ is investigating the clear ethics violations of the Biden's at best, or absolute corrupt crimes.

Sent me the link were Trump asked Zelenskiy to publicly announce investigations, so I can answer your question in full context.

[_Markk]

Apparently, for the same reason a dog licks its balls.

Yes, exactly, because he can, he has that power and ability, and more importantly because they stink and are dirty.

But I will add your answer to the other answers...right next to the fat guy who likes mustard.

[_Jersey Girl]

No. That is not my answer. Read that ONE LINE sentence again. It's ONE freaking line.

It is so far, at least that I have found...what is your full answer then?

Thanks

You can't even decipher a simple sentence structure.

[_Markk]

Hey, Markk -

Given your inability to answer why Trump did not engage the DoJ in pursuing corruption that you claim he was sure existed because “he was sure that it existed”, then why would Trump need to ask Zelensky to look into any corruption claim, or make a public announcement about same?

After all, there would be no need to ask Zelensky to do anything, either, right?

We can keep playing this game, fine, but the reality is you just don't like my answer...but keep asking , hopefully sooner or later you will answer a question of mine.

But this whole exercise is why I believe that Trump will win again...you don't want an objective conversation, like actually expounding on anything you might believe...your only option is identity politics so to speak. My suggestion is , get a plan own that you need one, and vote the guy out...he is playing you guys like a fiddle at this point. Who are you going to vote for and why? I have asked many liberal friends and even some here, and the answer is they don't really care as long as it is not Trump...one, I believe Doc, even wanted an old couch...but neither Jersey Girl or Pelosi are running. (Schmo, I know I got a smile out of you on that one...but get ready I see a tantrum coming, love ya Jersey Girl)

If you could not beat a game show host, with the most experienced candidate ever, good luck with a incumbent President, with a very good record with economy.

But anyways carry on.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

I’m posting this for Markk again, because I don’t believe he made it beyond the couple of items he copied, pasted, and sorta kinda vomited some sort of brainlet comments on:

https://www.justsecurity.org/66271/time ... rainegate/

READ THE ENTIRE THING YOU damned WIDGET.

- Doc

[_schreech]

1. Why didn’t Trump have the DoJ investigate the Bidens, if he believed that they were dirty?

2. Why ask the leader of a foreign nation, instead, to publicly announce ‘investigations’?

Still, you’ve given no evidence that the Bidens were ‘dirty’. Claims against the ownership of Burisma do not equate to proof of anything illegal by any Biden.

Its hilarious that markkk thinks "bEcauSe hE cAn!!!" is an answer to "why didn't Trump have the doj investigate the bidens?". Its like he is too stupid to understand that its not an answer to the questions asked AND it doesn't even provide any information as to why Trump wouldn't use the actual department in charge of these types of investigating even though "hE cAN!!" enlist a foreign nation to do it. His inability to even understand and answer a simple question sort of lets you know what type of dense, blind faith tumpologist you are dealing with. His never ending, barely coherent word salads are such shallow cop outs its making me wonder if he just doesn't understand the question. Im laughing that he is sticking to his non-answers without even attempting explain why Trump, even through "hE cAN!!!", didn't bother to bring it up to the DOJ who could both investigate and do something about it. Maybe markkk, like a little child who asks his parents "why?", never matured intellectually to the point that "because I can" is not an acceptable answer.

His willingness to continue to make a fool of himself is definitely entertaining as he waves his hands and pretends like he has answered any of the questions he has been asked but, dang, his total lack of self awareness and need to continue humiliating himself makes me feel kind of bad for him.

B-T-W, since Trump decided to ask the Ukraine for dirt on the bidens, where is all this dirt they uncovered? Markkk is sure they are dirty (with no real evidence) and Trump enlisted a foreign power to dig up said dirt ("bEcaUSe he caNN!!!"), so where is the evidence?

[_schreech]

We can keep playing this game, fine, but the reality is you just don't like my answer...but keep asking , hopefully sooner or later you will answer a question of mine.

But this whole exercise is why I believe that Trump will win again...you don't want an objective conversation, like actually expounding on anything you might believe...your only option is identity politics so to speak. My suggestion is , get a plan own that you need one, and vote the guy out...he is playing you guys like a fiddle at this point. Who are you going to vote for and why? I have asked many liberal friends and even some here, and the answer is they don't really care as long as it is not Trump...one, I believe Doc, even wanted an old couch...but neither Jersey Girl or Pelosi are running. (Schmo, I know I got a smile out of you on that one...but get ready I see a tantrum coming, love ya Jersey Girl)

If you could not beat a game show host, with the most experienced candidate ever, good luck with a incumbent President, with a very good record with economy.

But anyways carry on.

[_canpakes]

Hey, Markk -

Given your inability to answer why Trump did not engage the DoJ in pursuing corruption that you claim he was sure existed because “he was sure that it existed”, then why would Trump need to ask Zelensky to look into any corruption claim, or make a public announcement about same?

After all, there would be no need to ask Zelensky to do anything, either, right?

We can keep playing this game, fine, but the reality is you just don't like my answer...but keep asking , hopefully sooner or later you will answer a question of mine.

OK. So you can’t answer this one, either.

But you want me to answer your list of questions. ; )

I think you’re asking me if I believe that we need to ‘assume corruption and investigate’ folks for merely being related to other folks that engaged in common and legitimate business activities, if same are politically aligned in a manner that you don’t like. The answer to that would be, ‘No’.

Now, wanna take a crack at my two questions, considering that your question - which was your distraction thrown up so that you could avoid answering mine - is now addressed?

You keep telling folks to focus; you might heed that advice yourself.

Why would Trump need to ask Zelensky to look into any corruption claim, or make a public announcement about same, given your response to the question put to you about why Trump did not engage our own DoJ?

[_canpakes]

Apparently, for the same reason a dog licks its balls.

Yes, exactly, because he can, he has that power and ability, and more importantly because they stink and are dirty.

But I will add your answer to the other answers...right next to the fat guy who likes mustard.

This is a serious accusation, Markk. Maybe we need to investigate Trump for being so stinky and dirty.