Louis Midgley Threatens to "Pay a Visit" to Gina Colvin

[_Gadianton]

Maybe "a couple" of self-reflective moments are in order?

Lol! Indeed professor, indeed.

[_I have a question]

It’s interesting that Midgley’s retelling of the story amounts to the men folk getting together to “deal with” one of their troublesome wives.

[_Doctor Scratch]

My, my! It would seem that there is a new development in this saga:

How could one possibly "investigate" in Christchurch where Gina Colvin may or may not attend church from a bloody cruise ship? What I posted is all in the public domain, Self Exiled. One cannot possibly leave a cruise ship some fifty miles of narrow, winding road from where one has to be tendered from the ship to the shore and then travel for two hours to Christchurch on a bus, and then leave a group and find on Sunday an entirely unknown Anglican church in the hope of just happening that it would be at one and at the right time and place were someone might or might not be doing their and then somehow find where the bus is so that one can get back to the ship so that one can board it before it leaves. Such a thing would be impossible for me at 89.

And I just this afternoon sent a photography of the card that Nathan McCluskey, who is Gina Colvin's husband to the disgusting Dr. Velho Burrinho, who has, like other disgusting swine, refused to believe that I actually met and befriended him at the chapel in Christchurch. I did this because I am very much annoyed at the absurd things he has posted in public about me.

(emphasis added)

Wow! Quite a bold move there, Dr. Midgley! Sending "a photography of the card" to Dr. LOD? Well, this should be pretty easy to verify. But, of course, there are a number of implausible things here. First, did McCluskey really send a "card" to Midgley? Why on earth would he do that? Second, how would Midgley even *know* how/where to send "a photography of the card" to Dr. LOD?

Very strange, but I will be waiting anxiously to see evidence of this "card" from Dr. McCloskey. If it doesn't materialize, then of course, Midgley is a liar.

[_Lemmie]

Midgley:

How could one possibly "investigate" in Christchurch where Gina Colvin may or may not attend church from a bloody cruise ship? What I posted is all in the public domain, Self Exiled. One cannot possibly leave a cruise ship some fifty miles of narrow, winding road from where one has to be tendered from the ship to the shore and then travel for two hours to Christchurch on a bus, and then leave a group and find on Sunday an entirely unknown Anglican church in the hope of just happening that it would be at one and at the right time and place were someone might or might not be doing their and then somehow find where the bus is so that one can get back to the ship so that one can board it before it leaves. Such a thing would be impossible for me at 89.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 4952291159

Just wanted to document Midgley’s latest change of story in his attempt to justify stalking Gina Colvin. It’s getting pretty absurd.

[_Dr Exiled]

Stalky Stalkerton Midgley is clearly guilty of stalking Gina Colvin and her husband. What should the sentence be? Perhaps he should do some community service that teaches him how it is to be Maori, Mexican American, Native American or African American? I could recommend some areas in Las Vegas where he could serve that could teach him what reality is.

[_Philo Sofee]

Stalky Stalkerton Midgley is clearly guilty of stalking Gina Colvin and her husband. What should the sentence be? Perhaps he should do some community service that teaches him how it is to be Maori, Mexican American, Native American or African American? I could recommend some areas in Las Vegas where he could serve that could teach him what reality is.

Midgley would make the perfect "missionary companion" to our very own LDSFAQS, who, very much like Midgley, has done everything (and done it better than all) and knows everything, and so can teach everything, all the while denying everything of any kind of negative value whatsoever in either their thinking or actions. What a dynamic duo that would be in order to bring peace, order, and love to the awful accusatory world who so desperately needs it and doesn't grasp that fact.

[_Dr LOD]

My, my! It would seem that there is a new development in this saga:

How could one possibly "investigate" in Christchurch where Gina Colvin may or may not attend church from a bloody cruise ship? What I posted is all in the public domain, Self Exiled. One cannot possibly leave a cruise ship some fifty miles of narrow, winding road from where one has to be tendered from the ship to the shore and then travel for two hours to Christchurch on a bus, and then leave a group and find on Sunday an entirely unknown Anglican church in the hope of just happening that it would be at one and at the right time and place were someone might or might not be doing their and then somehow find where the bus is so that one can get back to the ship so that one can board it before it leaves. Such a thing would be impossible for me at 89.

And I just this afternoon sent a photography of the card that Nathan McCluskey, who is Gina Colvin's husband to the disgusting Dr. Velho Burrinho, who has, like other disgusting swine, refused to believe that I actually met and befriended him at the chapel in Christchurch. I did this because I am very much annoyed at the absurd things he has posted in public about me.

(emphasis added)

Wow! Quite a bold move there, Dr. Midgley! Sending "a photography of the card" to Dr. LOD? Well, this should be pretty easy to verify. But, of course, there are a number of implausible things here. First, did McCluskey really send a "card" to Midgley? Why on earth would he do that? Second, how would Midgley even *know* how/where to send "a photography of the card" to Dr. LOD?

Very strange, but I will be waiting anxiously to see evidence of this "card" from Dr. McCloskey. If it doesn't materialize, then of course, Midgley is a liar.

Professor Midgley did sent me a photograph of Professor McClusky’s business card. I’m not sure what his point is. This may prove he at least was close enough to request a card. And possibly have some type of conversation. Maybe this the Mopologist equivalent of “counting coup.”

But it does little to clear up anything else, concerning him seeking out Professor Colvin while on his New Zealand visit and cruise.

[_Lemmie]

Recall Midgley posted about “cards,” here is the post and link from earlier in this thread:

Louis Midgley Dr. Exiled •

My Dermatologist and his wife were there, and my youngest son and his wife were there, and ten or twelve others were there and witnessed what happened. It was not a chance meeting at all. Gina's husband wanted it to happen, as did his Bishop and Stake President, and on my birthday, on March 12, I had a phone call from the Area President asking how it went. And Nathan and I exchanged cards and we have also exchanged email messages.

You are, of course, perfectly free to "think," if that is the right word, whatever you care to in an effort to continue to make an utter fool out of yourself.

http://disq.us/p/29k9vco

Colvin’s husband and Midgley are exchanging email messages? I’m guessing any “exchange” was one from Midgley followed by a cease and desist order in response. Gina herself has confirmed her husband did not even know who Midgley was, and that Midgley approached him. And now Midgley has the bishop, the stake president and the area president involved in this breach of Gina Colvin’s privacy.

I can only imagine how Midgley misrepresented himself in order to get McCluskey to offer his card. Midgley’s stalking technique is well-developed.

[_Gadianton]

It's very possible her husband is being diplomatic, and Mr. M mistakes that for dear friendship. The bottom line to me though is how the conflict on Dr. Colvin's blog ended. While Dr. Colvin herself didn't respond directly to the massive derail to her thread, note that she let it stand, and note that there are 7 comments pending moderator approval. Six of those are by Midgley and one is by a junior apologist. Absolutely every comment chastising Midgley was allowed to stand. I would say that's pretty good evidence that Midgley's attempts to get chummy by sailing to New Zealand were unappreciated. While to any person with two working brain cells, the seeking out of Dr. Colvin was rooted in desire for conflict, giving Mr. M the benefit of the doubt that he only had the truest intentions to be friendly; sometimes things just don't work out. He went down there and she didn't want to see him. He shows up on her blog and she obviously didn't want to hear from him there either. The right thing to do is to just let it go. Quit bugging her. Quit writing open notes to her and hubby on Sic et Non. Quit abusing hubby's generosity. Quit needling them. It's just the right thing to do, and the best part is that he can stop his advances all under his subjective belief that he'd never done anything wrong, and she had taken offense where none was intended. People do this all the time. People all the time stop and say, "whoa, I didn't expect a response like that! I sure didn't mean anything by it" and then, say to themselves, "Okay I get it, we'll just drop it because obviously this isn't helping." But it's quite obvious that Mr. Midgley has no intention on taking "no" for an answer, and will continue to needle Dr. Colvin by writing open notes on Sic et Non, and by continuing a correspondence with her husband.

[_Lemmie]

But it's quite obvious that Mr. Midgley has no intention on taking "no" for an answer, and will continue to needle Dr. Colvin by writing open notes on Sic et Non, and by continuing a correspondence with her husband.

Clearly. Prime example:

Louis Midgley Dr. Exiled • 20 hours ago

How could one possibly "investigate" in Christchurch where Gina Colvin may or may not attend church from a bloody cruise ship? What I posted is all in the public domain, Self Exiled. One cannot possibly leave a cruise ship some fifty miles of narrow, winding road from where one has to be tendered from the ship to the shore and then travel for two hours to Christchurch on a bus, and then leave a group and find on Sunday an entirely unknown Anglican church in the hope of just happening that it would be at one and at the right time and place were someone might or might not be doing their and then somehow find where the bus is so that one can get back to the ship so that one can board it before it leaves. Such a thing would be impossible for me at 89.

Midgley is being disingenuous. His visit to Colvin’s husband’s congregation was his plan. First, he confirmed Colvin would likely not be at her own service, which he confirmed by trying to ask her about the “size” of her congregation:

LMidgley: “Would you please explain where this Community of Christ group meets in Christchurch and also how many there are in this group? I will, God willing, be in New Zealand in February, and might drop in to see your new venture, but I will need an address and so forth.”

Once he had satisfied himself that there was no service to attend where he would be, he denied asking and moved to the next stage:

Midgley wrote:

I did not ask Gina for an address where the Community of Christ worships on Sundays in Christchurch.

I more than hinted that she is the only member of the Community of Christ south of Auckland. What is "creepy" about mentioning that she is likely to be the only member of that sinking ship in Christchurch?

I have exactly no interest in where or when she does her Anglican thing.

Now if Gina Colvin just happens to be in the Ward in which we are planning to attend Sacrament meeting, I would not mind meeting her. But, if we end up in the same sacrament meeting and she does not care to introduce herself, that is fine with me.

And how did he conclude he was more likely to see her at her husband’s ward?

LMidgley: “My point was that, if she is not busy doing her Anglican thing, she only has her former Latter-day Saint Ward in which to worship since it is likely that she is the only member of the Community of Christ south of Auckland.”

Stalking, 101. By Louise Midgley.

ETA: or, to use the term Dr. Shades has apparently created, Midgley “colvinizes.”