Just to make sure I am understanding what I bolded, are you saying you think that mopologists have never had a significant negative influence on anyone’s real life with their writings? Or just this week?Physics Guy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 8:42 pmWell, yes. But exactly.
Apart from what might have been the odd attempt to mess with somebody's pension, which isn't a completely clear case to me, the nastiness of the Mormon apologists is limited to snide comments on a blog that few people are going to see who haven't already signed the waiver. We have to keep this in perspective. They may fall short of what one would expect from the only true priests of the only true God, but once you've dropped that expectation they're not even on the radar of really bad things in the world. I hope I don't make excuses for people who do make that list, but below a certain point, hey, few people are nearly as good as we should be and I want to be as understanding as possible of anyone who isn't really doing much harm.
Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
I don't believe they've physically attacked anyone. Writings can certainly have a negative influence if people believe the writings and change their own lives in bad ways, but from that point of view I think a suavely polite defense of Mormonism might have a more negative influence than all the snark in the world, to be honest.
And all kinds of things have negative influences. I try not to have them but I'm sure I do, too, so I try to be sure I'm without comparable sins before I go casting stones. Louis Midgley's grammatically unreliable rancor seems bad to me, but more sad than bad.
And all kinds of things have negative influences. I try not to have them but I'm sure I do, too, so I try to be sure I'm without comparable sins before I go casting stones. Louis Midgley's grammatically unreliable rancor seems bad to me, but more sad than bad.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
A negative influence doesn’t have to be physical. I’m not the historian here, so maybe there can be a better response regarding mopologetic activity, but I am aware that people have had their places of employment contacted resulting in disturbance, people have been verbally accosted in their work places, a boy was outed to his father resulting in a major family rift, etc. The written “hit pieces” surely have had a negative effect in people’s professional lives, and just the all around hatred for those who leave their church is causing many ongoing problems if people in your family are still LDS and hear mopologetic as well as official church output.Physics Guy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 10:01 pmI don't believe they've physically attacked anyone. Writings can certainly have a negative influence if people believe the writings and change their own lives in bad ways, but from that point of view I think a suavely polite defense of Mormonism might have a more negative influence than all the snark in the world, to be honest.
And all kinds of things have negative influences. I try not to have them but I'm sure I do, too, so I try to be sure I'm without comparable sins before I go casting stones. Louis Midgley's grammatically unreliable rancor seems bad to me, but more sad than bad.
Maybe someone else can offer a more comprehensive list of the damage done.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9947
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
"...But I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with QAnon."
lol. He *is* associated with QAnon. He made a contract and took a big check from a representative of QAnon binding him not to reference QAnon as QAnon. I count Dr. Moore as one of my good friends and not just a dedicated member of the faculty, in in real life also, and I'm pretty sure I'm on the QAnon "list of six".
lol. He *is* associated with QAnon. He made a contract and took a big check from a representative of QAnon binding him not to reference QAnon as QAnon. I count Dr. Moore as one of my good friends and not just a dedicated member of the faculty, in in real life also, and I'm pretty sure I'm on the QAnon "list of six".
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:19 am
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
A tip of the hat to you too, Dean Robbers!
I guess we should be more gracious, no? Think about it. The chartering of a new chapter of QAnon is automatically bestowed when a person speculates among friends on the personal beliefs and intentions of others. Therefore, how can Doctor Scratch do anything but offer a friendly salute to his sister chapter, headed up by Midgley, Kiwi57, Peterson and Gee?
Protests from the gallery? Well, may the guiltless cast the first stone. Can any of those 4 honestly claim to have never speculated on another’s faith, beliefs, intentions, or integrity?
I don’t know if you’re on the list of 6, Gadianton (perhaps that clarification is warranted), but even if not, you may consider a welcome party to honor the anti-ex-LDS chapter of QAnon!
I guess we should be more gracious, no? Think about it. The chartering of a new chapter of QAnon is automatically bestowed when a person speculates among friends on the personal beliefs and intentions of others. Therefore, how can Doctor Scratch do anything but offer a friendly salute to his sister chapter, headed up by Midgley, Kiwi57, Peterson and Gee?
Protests from the gallery? Well, may the guiltless cast the first stone. Can any of those 4 honestly claim to have never speculated on another’s faith, beliefs, intentions, or integrity?
I don’t know if you’re on the list of 6, Gadianton (perhaps that clarification is warranted), but even if not, you may consider a welcome party to honor the anti-ex-LDS chapter of QAnon!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 10590
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
Lol. Karma.Dr Moore wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:01 am
...I guess we should be more gracious, no? Think about it. The chartering of a new chapter of QAnon is automatically bestowed when a person speculates among friends on the personal beliefs and intentions of others. Therefore, how can Doctor Scratch do anything but offer a friendly salute to his sister chapter, headed up by Midgley, Kiwi57, Peterson and Gee?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8025
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
Does Donald Trump accept donations from Antifa? Could this be seen as a kind of "mafia payment"? How does Dr. Peterson justify accepting money from such a group?Gadianton wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 11:15 pm"...But I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with QAnon."
lol. He *is* associated with QAnon. He made a contract and took a big check from a representative of QAnon binding him not to reference QAnon as QAnon. I count Dr. Moore as one of my good friends and not just a dedicated member of the faculty, in in real life also, and I'm pretty sure I'm on the QAnon "list of six".
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9947
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
A profound question, Professor.Does Donald Trump accept donations from Antifa? Could this be seen as a kind of "mafia payment"? How does Dr. Peterson justify accepting money from such a group?
I think the most realistic answer is that he doesn't really see this board as a "hate site" or nearly as bad as he portrays it.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
Let's call it the July Six:
Scratch
Gadianton
Everybody Wang Chung
Lemmie
Shades
Blair Hodges
I had to make a wild guess for those last two.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 21663
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am
Re: Peterson promises to ignore Mormon Discussions Board
Huh. Apparently the QAnon thing has pretty strong roots among Republican types:
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/07/08/ ... hrke-utah/
"On election night, he [Burgess Owens, the newly selected GOP challenger to Utah's 4th District Congressman Ben McAdams] tweeted congratulations to Lauren Boebert, a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theories who won a primary in Colorado and who shares Owens’ zeal for rooting out both socialists AND Marxists.
Shortly after winning the primary, President Donald Trump tweeted out his endorsement of the candidate."
It should be noted Burgess Owens had a total screed-appearance on Fox about Socialists and Democrats or.. whatever. I don't watch Fox.
Anyway.
Once again we see Dowsin' Dan jump balls deep into projection. It's psychologically fascinating, really.
- Doc
https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/07/08/ ... hrke-utah/
"On election night, he [Burgess Owens, the newly selected GOP challenger to Utah's 4th District Congressman Ben McAdams] tweeted congratulations to Lauren Boebert, a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theories who won a primary in Colorado and who shares Owens’ zeal for rooting out both socialists AND Marxists.
Shortly after winning the primary, President Donald Trump tweeted out his endorsement of the candidate."
It should be noted Burgess Owens had a total screed-appearance on Fox about Socialists and Democrats or.. whatever. I don't watch Fox.
Anyway.
Once again we see Dowsin' Dan jump balls deep into projection. It's psychologically fascinating, really.
- Doc