If people actually watched his testimony they'd know he only began bawling when describing how people were running after him. It had nothing to do with grief over killing members of his own species.Some Schmo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 13, 2021 11:23 pmI hope the tears were real. I hope killing people made an impact on him. I hope he feels awful about it and that it haunts him forever, and not just because he's in trouble. Maybe he does have a conscience.
Here’s a bit:Jersey Girl wrote:It wasn't just the Asian food comment. I'll let you go hunt down the remainder of his remarks to see why he's being criticized.
Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder has already displayed quite a bit of eyebrow-raising behavior, but one particularly unbelievable moment shared between the 75-year-old and the defense team has left the internet utterly speechless.
At one point during the hearing, one of the defendant's attorneys made the strange argument that prosecutors' use of iPads to show photos should not be allowed because Apple somehow tampers with the images.
Using a variety of techy "buzz" words he could not define, the lawyer explained to the judge, "I don't know what the state's gonna do next, but I suspect that it's something along the lines of they're going to use the iPad, and [Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger] was talking about pinching the screen?"
"iPads, which are made by Apple, have artificial intelligence in them that allow things to be viewed through three dimensions and logarithms," he went on, prompting someone from across the room to ask for clarification.
"Logarithms?" he reiterated, putting his hands up. "I don't understand it all, either. And it uses artificial intelligence – or their logarithms – to create what they believe is happening."
"So this isn't actually enhanced video," he argued. "This is Apple's iPad programing creating what it thinks is there, not what necessarily is there. And I don't know what's gonna happen."
If that weren't enough to light the internet on fire, the judge decided to whip out his phone – which has become quite a talking point during the trial – and tell the whole courtroom that he does not know how to save text messages.
The point of the bizarre announcement remains unclear, and many on social media are demanding to know its relevance to the case.
"I don't know how to save text messages," Schroeder declared proudly from behind the bench. "I haven't figured that out, and I haven't... You know, I have a lot of things that I'm doing, so that's a low priority for me to figure out how to save a text message."
Using his thumb and an index finger, he attempted to pinch something on his phone screen. "And it's just," he noted dramatically, "a blur."
K Graham wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 1:53 amRittenhouse isn't going to become a millionaire because of libel suits because there really is no case for libel against him. Even if people were lying about him he is now a public figure and so his attorney would have to prove malice, which isn't going to happen.
He's going to become a millionaire by feeding off the adoration from the Right. They love giving their money away to pet icons. They're still dumping money into Trump's coffers because they're really that stupid.
So he lied about being EMT, and he lied about being asked to protect a business.canpakes wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:01 am
Not only that, but the actual owners of that car lot didn’t ask Rittenhouse or anyone else to defend their property.
https://www.insider.com/brothers-say-th ... ce-2021-11
He went to protect business owners and property from BLM arsonists, vandals, and looters because the police force could not, would not, or simply weren't allowed not to do so.Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't a business owner, so you're just out in left field again. No one is criticizing business owners for defending their businesses. But it does still remain unlawful to use lethal force to protect property.
It's an honest question. What is an atheists definition of a conscience. I'm guessing it's not the light of Christ.Is Schmo on trial or is Kyle?
ajax18 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:05 amHe went to protect business owners and property from BLM arsonists, vandals, and looters because the police force could not, would not, or simply weren't allowed not to do so.Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't a business owner, so you're just out in left field again. No one is criticizing business owners for defending their businesses. But it does still remain unlawful to use lethal force to protect property.
What exactly is it then?You’re right. Real conscience oftentimes has little or nothing to do with Christ.