You think Mr. Rittenhouse wanted to be raped when he was a minor?
What on earth are you talking about? He is the one who came packing heat. Obviously he wanted to do the raping.
Since Rosenbaum was pursuing Mr. Rittenhouse you are prescribing the "short skirt" defense for rapists, which is still a successful strategy.
Yes, but you don’t believe that because you have shared Kyle’s thrill of walking around pointing his big gun at people. You admitted that already. Own it!
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
??? Rosenbaum was a pedophile, and the GOP doesn’t seem to like him one bit.
You mean unlike all of the other pedophiles they put in charge of things.
If only he had lived, he might have been Trump’s campaign manager for 2024.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Question: does provocation nullify the right to self-defense?
Suppose that K had been pointing his gun at people, including R, and talking crap and making threats. The altercation with R takes place and he is killed. Now enters a second group of people, three of whom attack or try to disarm K -- however you wish to look at it. As K has not threatened these people, why would his right to self-defense be any different?
It seems to me that legally, anyway, if there is not an immanent threat, then one attacks a suspect at their own risk, as the suspect maintains the right to respond with deadly force.
In other words: If one threatens or provokes with a gun, unless the response to the provocation happens in the moment, the provoker has the right to kill anyone aside from law enforcement making an arrest, who tries to subdue the provoker.
Social distancing has likely already begun to flatten the curve...Continue to research good antivirals and vaccine candidates. Make everyone wear masks. -- J.D. Vance
Does your Binger smell now? Tell me when you graduate from middle school and start Binging.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
