No, I’m saying the strategy is bad for politicking.
I haven't said anything in this thread with deference to a particular party. Most of my comments are commentary on gun attitudes in this country. People want to make this about the trial, or the video, or the riots, or anything else except the big fat damned elephant in the room.
I suppose it's an economic problem. All these guys trying to compensate for their tiny dicks can more easily afford a big gun than a nice sports car.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense.
The vigilantes in the Rittenhouse case were obvious: Jump kick man, Huber and Grosskreutz. They were all shot or shot at while trying to deliver justice outside the law. And they were all felons just breaking the laws, again.
Self-appointed armed security man Kyle Rittenhouse was every bit as much of a vigilante as those who tried to stop him.
The real problem here is that you approve of Rittenhouse's version of vigilantism.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
I suppose it's an economic problem. All these guys trying to compensate for their tiny dicks can more easily afford a big gun than a nice sports car.
Calling other men "pussy" online is even cheaper if you already have a computer and an internet connection.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”