Mormons, Trolls, & Progressives

[Binger]

Some people are correct to think that. And in most in real life situations, that works. In others, that fails. Here, it fails spectacularly.

Have a good one, Analytics.

Acting like a decent human being works pretty well here, too. For example, about a month ago a TBM made a post defending the apologist Hanna Seariac. He said, "Hanna Seariac is an awesome human being and has an admirable curiosity to keep inquiring and improving her understanding...."

None other than Dr. Scratch responded with, "Thanks for this thoughtful and generous post...."

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=154597&p=2761694&hi ... y#p2761694

Paraphrasing what Dr. Shades would say, we each can choose to be part of the problem or part of the solution.

What is the problem that we can choose, and what is the solution that we can choose?

[Marcus]

UR-4 Violation. I would report it if I was not on probation. The OP does not say anything about "adorable."

panny, you petulant little troll, do you have anything to add, other than being a troll?

Binger, have you been specifically told you are "on probation" here? And have you been specifically told that you are not allowed to report violations?

[canpakes]

UR-4 Violation. I would report it if I was not on probation. The OP does not say anything about "adorable."

panny, you petulant little troll, do you have anything to add, other than being a troll?

Binger, have you been specifically told you are "on probation" here? And have you been specifically told that you are not allowed to report violations?

Binger has my permission to post the contents of any non-public communication (PM) that has occurred between the two of us, if he wishes to claim any particulars on what he believes he has been told, at least by me. I will confirm the contents that he posts, if it is accurate and not fabricated/augmented/altered by him.

[Binger]

Binger, have you been specifically told you are "on probation" here? And have you been specifically told that you are not allowed to report violations?

Binger has my permission to post the contents of any non-public communication (PM) that has occurred between the two of us, if he wishes to claim any particulars on what he believes he has been told, at least by me. I will confirm the contents that he posts, if it is accurate and not fabricated/augmented/altered by him.

LMFAO!

[canpakes]

LMFAO!

[Analytics]

Acting like a decent human being works pretty well here, too. For example, about a month ago a TBM made a post defending the apologist Hanna Seariac. He said, "Hanna Seariac is an awesome human being and has an admirable curiosity to keep inquiring and improving her understanding...."

None other than Dr. Scratch responded with, "Thanks for this thoughtful and generous post...."

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=154597&p=2761694&hi ... y#p2761694

Paraphrasing what Dr. Shades would say, we each can choose to be part of the problem or part of the solution.

What is the problem that we can choose, and what is the solution that we can choose?

The problem is not following the golden rule. The solution is following the golden rule. That's how I see it.

In the words of the man himself:

Remember, you must be the change you wish to see at DiscussMormonism.com.

[Marcus]

Binger, have you been specifically told you are "on probation" here? And have you been specifically told that you are not allowed to report violations?

Binger has my permission to post the contents of any non-public communication (PM) that has occurred between the two of us, if he wishes to claim any particulars on what he believes he has been told, at least by me. I will confirm the contents that he posts, if it is accurate and not fabricated/augmented/altered by him.

Got it. Well, that answers my questions. : D

[Binger]

What is the problem that we can choose, and what is the solution that we can choose?

The problem is not following the golden rule. The solution is following the golden rule. That's how I see it.

In the words of the man himself:

Remember, you must be the change you wish to see at DiscussMormonism.com.

Okay

[canpakes]

Binger has my permission to post the contents of any non-public communication (PM) that has occurred between the two of us, if he wishes to claim any particulars on what he believes he has been told, at least by me. I will confirm the contents that he posts, if it is accurate and not fabricated/augmented/altered by him.

Got it. Well, that answers my questions. : D

I figure that rather than subject this forum and its participants to another 10 pages of him ranting on and on about things that never happened, I’ll just give him the opportunity to provide any supposed evidence he’d claim to have, right out of the gate.

[canpakes]

I figure that rather than subject this forum and its participants to another 10 pages of him ranting on and on about things that never happened, I’ll just give him the opportunity to provide any supposed evidence he’d claim to have, right out of the gate.

Oh. Nice. Thanks. You are also cordially invited to eat crap, right off the plate. I figured that would be better than having you just troll the joint for 20 more pages. So go on, eat the whole dish.

How is this going, Analytics?

Isn’t this you, just a few posts back? -

You be you. I'm cool with that.

Some people are correct to think that. And in most in real life situations, that works. In others, that fails. Here, it fails spectacularly.

I’m happy to provide a link to a thread or two, or a dozen, that fully demonstrate you being you. What’s not to like about that?

Then again, maybe you should think about erasing another 2000 posts, or so. ; )