Rules and Moderator information

[Binger]

Right, and the person of issue is happy to create hours and hours of reviewing work for you to do for his own entertainment, and Shades' rules make a problem impossible to solve until it personally bothers him.

Just as a matter of historical testimony, I've seen Shades rip posts right off the board and then ban the poster who made them...in real time. And then do it all over again when they showed up with a new moniker doing the same thing then finally banning the IP address. Again, in real time.

Why has he not done it this time? Have you asked him?

[canpakes]

.

Another issue is that Gad's Cabal has convinced themselves that two people are only trolling and that they are the only trolls. Neither one of those assumptions is true. And THAT is what is crippling change which they hope will result from yet another rule/moderation adaptation. It was never true, and it is still not true. Gadianton is trying to convince everyone that these two things are true, and they are not. If ever he and others can come to terms with the fact that there are not just two trolls and that those two people do not just troll, he may see a different option and solution.

I am not shy about my views on this, and I will be less shy about it going forward now that Gadianton and Doc played their hands. panny is trolling the everloving crap out of the board and doing so as a moderator. That is FINE! He can do that. That is Shades' choice to have a troll on the moderating team and to let him troll the hell out of the joint. There is nothing wrong with that, at all. Shades can have it and panny can do it. But, to pretend that this is not happening - that is not my effing problem. Hell, even panny is not shy about admitting that he is trolling. He makes no bones about it, and neither have Cammy and Gaddy in this thread.

This proxy complaining about the moderators time spent moderating, when one of the moderators is incessantly in the mix of the mixups, is absolutely hysterical. I mean LOL LOL LOL funny AF. "Oh, look at my sympathy for the people I like and look how I feel and feel how I look and ignore the facts but know my feelings..... woooooo..... booooo.... hoooooo." Mmmmhmmm. Yeah. Rekt, get it?

So get on with it. Pretend things are different than they are, and make a move. Or deal with the facts, and make a move. Who cares?

Just passing by to note that there’s no specific board rule on trolling. You’ve decided to pretend that there is, as an excuse to test the system.

Your excuse to be disruptive after the fact because you don’t like one or more mods brought on board to address what was arguably a problem of your disruption before the fact is still a nonsense position of yours. Your behavior is your responsibility, and not the fault of anyone else.

[Binger]

There are many good options that would work very well.

And frankly, nobody disagrees more with Shades than me about what is the core problem here, obviously. Though, that does not mean that he is perfectly right and that I am perfectly wrong, it means there are differences. I noticed that one of they key questions that I asked the moderators on this topic got moved away despite it being a plain and simple question.

There is clearly a core group that wants a few people banned. And clearly, there are reasons that they feel this. And yet, when it comes to actually dealing with the conditions under which one posts on the board, there is nothing but screaming, "WE SHALL NEVER SURRENDER." This is followed by more of the same cycles.

I will say it again, I will say it over, and over, and over. Taking a passive or submissive position regarding the insults, including generalizations and bigoted insults about large groups, is not happening with me. I have tried that and other approaches, and they do not work here. So, if you fire your guns, I will fire mine. (that is a metaphor) Panache and clever trolling insults work for most the posters here, and a not subtle rejection of those insults works for me.

Another issue is that Gad's Cabal has convinced themselves that two people are only trolling and that they are the only trolls. Neither one of those assumptions is true. And THAT is what is crippling change which they hope will result from yet another rule/moderation adaptation. It was never true, and it is still not true. Gadianton is trying to convince everyone that these two things are true, and they are not. If ever he and others can come to terms with the fact that there are not just two trolls and that those two people do not just troll, he may see a different option and solution.

I am not shy about my views on this, and I will be less shy about it going forward now that Gadianton and Doc played their hands. panny is trolling the everloving crap out of the board and doing so as a moderator. That is FINE! He can do that. That is Shades' choice to have a troll on the moderating team and to let him troll the hell out of the joint. There is nothing wrong with that, at all. Shades can have it and panny can do it. But, to pretend that this is not happening - that is not my effing problem. Hell, even panny is not shy about admitting that he is trolling. He makes no bones about it, and neither have Cammy and Gaddy in this thread.

This proxy complaining about the moderators time spent moderating, when one of the moderators is incessantly in the mix of the mixups, is absolutely hysterical. I mean LOL LOL LOL funny AF. "Oh, look at my sympathy for the people I like and look how I feel and feel how I look and ignore the facts but know my feelings..... woooooo..... booooo.... hoooooo." Mmmmhmmm. Yeah. Rekt, get it?

So get on with it. Pretend things are different than they are, and make a move. Or deal with the facts, and make a move. Who cares?

Just quoting some seriously delusional nonsense. Not worth responding to. because this poster is far from rational, but worth quoting before he deletes it. This is, in my opinion, a mental health issue.

Does it make you sad that you can't write well enough to engage in a conversation? I would be disappointed if I had as many hurt feelings as you but could not express them.

Nothing in that post is nonsense. Maybe if your momma lets you use the keyboard longer than she lets you nurse, you could type some complete sentences and address the issues.

[Binger]

.

Another issue is that Gad's Cabal has convinced themselves that two people are only trolling and that they are the only trolls. Neither one of those assumptions is true. And THAT is what is crippling change which they hope will result from yet another rule/moderation adaptation. It was never true, and it is still not true. Gadianton is trying to convince everyone that these two things are true, and they are not. If ever he and others can come to terms with the fact that there are not just two trolls and that those two people do not just troll, he may see a different option and solution.

I am not shy about my views on this, and I will be less shy about it going forward now that Gadianton and Doc played their hands. panny is trolling the everloving crap out of the board and doing so as a moderator. That is FINE! He can do that. That is Shades' choice to have a troll on the moderating team and to let him troll the hell out of the joint. There is nothing wrong with that, at all. Shades can have it and panny can do it. But, to pretend that this is not happening - that is not my effing problem. Hell, even panny is not shy about admitting that he is trolling. He makes no bones about it, and neither have Cammy and Gaddy in this thread.

This proxy complaining about the moderators time spent moderating, when one of the moderators is incessantly in the mix of the mixups, is absolutely hysterical. I mean LOL LOL LOL funny AF. "Oh, look at my sympathy for the people I like and look how I feel and feel how I look and ignore the facts but know my feelings..... woooooo..... booooo.... hoooooo." Mmmmhmmm. Yeah. Rekt, get it?

So get on with it. Pretend things are different than they are, and make a move. Or deal with the facts, and make a move. Who cares?

Just passing by to note that there’s no specific board rule on trolling. You’ve decided to pretend that there is, as an excuse to test the system.

Your excuse to be disruptive after the fact because you don’t like one or more mods brought on board to address what was arguably a problem of your disruption before the fact is still a nonsense position of yours. Your behavior is your responsibility, and not the fault of anyone else.

Dummy. I have not pretended that there is a board rule on trolling. Your pals in the cabal are pretending that, not me. I am saying that there is no rule and that you are welcome to do it. This is exactly the problem with you, panny. You make this [deleted] up just to troll the boards.

My responses are all mine, panny. I am the one telling you that. The conditions under which we all operate here are collective. I have always told you that. If, at any point, you care to deal with the facts rather than your imaginary made up [deleted], that would be great. We look forward to that, panny.

[canpakes]

Dummy. I have not pretended that there is a board rule on trolling. Your pals in the cabal are pretending that, not me. I am saying that there is no rule and that you are welcome to do it. This is exactly the problem with you, panny. You make this [deleted] up just to troll the boards.

My responses are all mine, panny. I am the one telling you that. The conditions under which we all operate here are collective. I have always told you that. If, at any point, you care to deal with the facts rather than your imaginary made up [deleted], that would be great. We look forward to that, panny.

Color me unimpressed with your sidestep.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

[Binger]

Dummy. I have not pretended that there is a board rule on trolling. Your pals in the cabal are pretending that, not me. I am saying that there is no rule and that you are welcome to do it. This is exactly the problem with you, panny. You make this [deleted] up just to troll the boards.

My responses are all mine, panny. I am the one telling you that. The conditions under which we all operate here are collective. I have always told you that. If, at any point, you care to deal with the facts rather than your imaginary made up [deleted], that would be great. We look forward to that, panny.

Color me unimpressed with your sidestep.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because e your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

Not a sidestep, panny. Another twisted assumption on your part, you idiot. I am leaning directly into this, head on. Nothing sidestep about it.
I am articulating my point clearly, while you are trolling and making this about something else, including my inability to communicate.
I can deal with the facts, despite your distraction and trolling. That line you made about my feelings, is, again, you being a douchebag copycat playing I know you are but what am I games to impress Cammy and Gaddy. It is working spectacularly with them, not so much with me.

Be a man, panny. Show up. Tell us a bit about yourself. Take a risk. This sorry ass trolling act is fine, it is not against the rules, but it is still just an act.

[canpakes]

Color me unimpressed with your sidestep.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because e your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

Not a sidestep, panny. Another twisted assumption on your part, you idiot. I am leaning directly into this, head on. Nothing sidestep about it.
I am articulating my point clearly, while you are trolling and making this about something else, including my inability to communicate.
I can deal with the facts, despite your distraction and trolling. That line you made about my feelings, is, again, you being a douchebag copycat playing I know you are but what am I games to impress Cammy and Gaddy. It is working spectacularly with them, not so much with me.

Be a man, panny. Show up. Tell us a bit about yourself. Take a risk. This sorry ass trolling act is fine, it is not against the rules, but it is still just an act.

There went another opportunity for you to display some honesty.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

Do you have any ‘facts’ to talk about?

[Binger]

Not a sidestep, panny. Another twisted assumption on your part, you idiot. I am leaning directly into this, head on. Nothing sidestep about it.
I am articulating my point clearly, while you are trolling and making this about something else, including my inability to communicate.
I can deal with the facts, despite your distraction and trolling. That line you made about my feelings, is, again, you being a douchebag copycat playing I know you are but what am I games to impress Cammy and Gaddy. It is working spectacularly with them, not so much with me.

Be a man, panny. Show up. Tell us a bit about yourself. Take a risk. This sorry ass trolling act is fine, it is not against the rules, but it is still just an act.

There went another opportunity for you to display some honesty.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

Do you have any ‘facts’ to talk about?

Panny, this is you trolling. You just repeated the same crap you said before, with the same inarticulate horse crap. And you suggested that I was dishonest, which I was not. See, this is you setting up the conditions for how the board works and how you and I can and do connect or communicate. Now, I am telling you to [deleted] off, eat [deleted], and not get so upset that you [deleted]. See how that works? I am rejecting your insults, and telling you to [deleted] off. Is that clear to you?

And again, your stuff about the feelings, without dealing with the content, is just more of the same trolling "I know you are but what am I" [deleted].

This is you trolling again. This is what you do. And, if and when Shades does ban a few posters to protect you and your trolling, he should know that you will not change and that you will be a limiter on his board.

[canpakes]

There went another opportunity for you to display some honesty.

You aren’t here to deal with ‘facts’. If you were, you’d know what they were and would articulate them.

As you cannot do that, you are here only to be disruptive, because your feelings are hurt that not everyone here agrees with whatever you pretend to believe at the moment.

Do you have any ‘facts’ to talk about?

Panny, this is you trolling. You just repeated the same crap you said before, with the same inarticulate horse crap. And you suggested that I was dishonest, which I was not. See, this is you setting up the conditions for how the board works and how you and I can and do connect or communicate. Now, I am telling you to [deleted] off, eat [deleted], and not get so upset that you[deleted]. See how that works? I am rejecting your insults, and telling you to [deleted] off. Is that clear to you?

And again, your stuff about the feelings, without dealing with the content, is just more of the same trolling "I know you are but what am I" [deleted].

This is you trolling again. This is what you do. And, if and when Shades does ban a few posters to protect you and your trolling, he should know that you will not change and that you will be a limiter on his board.

More sidestepping from you.

Do you have any ‘facts’ to talk about?

[Binger]

Panny, this is you trolling. You just repeated the same crap you said before, with the same inarticulate horse crap. And you suggested that I was dishonest, which I was not. See, this is you setting up the conditions for how the board works and how you and I can and do connect or communicate. Now, I am telling you to [deleted] off, eat [deleted], and not get so upset that you[deleted]. See how that works? I am rejecting your insults, and telling you to [deleted] off. Is that clear to you?

And again, your stuff about the feelings, without dealing with the content, is just more of the same trolling "I know you are but what am I" [deleted].

This is you trolling again. This is what you do. And, if and when Shades does ban a few posters to protect you and your trolling, he should know that you will not change and that you will be a limiter on his board.

More sidestepping from you.

Do you have any ‘facts’ to talk about?

Again, this is more trolling from you. You are digressing, if that was even possible, regarding substance. I am not here to play fetch games nor am I here to swallow your troll hooks. Do the [deleted] work, and troll less.

If there is a specific point that you feel like I did not address then you are free to address that point with your own information. Another question that has presuppositions is not additive nor interesting, it is just trolling.