NBC news story on Hunter Biden

[honorentheos]

Whatever, scoundrel. It's in a text message from the laptop. It's on record that when Hunter's daughter asked that she was hoping to have a special Sunday breakfast he told her to get in line since he's been having to send the entire family fortune in the form of maple syrup to a person referred to in the text as "short stack". And in an email, there are communications between him and the executor of Joe's estate asking how he should handle contractors pressuring him for payment for the gold plated outdoor gas grill and greek granite replica of the Parthenon breakfast nook Joe had built with big a picture of Winnie the Pooh over the table under a banner, "Our Illustrious Benefactor that No One Suspects Because He's a Bear". No one's fooled by that, just because Pooh loves honey on his 'cakes. Nice try, Biden and 'pany!

So, tell us...who is "short stack", pany? Hmmmmm? Would it matter to YOU if Biden actually received honey from Winnie the Pooh, pany? Would it?!!!

Open your eyes 'cuz you're in a cult. You just don't want to face the facts.

[Jersey Girl]

by the way…back then you protected Hunter Biden,

Here's the thread. Prove it.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=152620

Markk will have to locate the point at which he derailed it first. Good luck with that.

[canpakes]

by the way…back then you protected Hunter Biden, ...

Here's the thread. Prove it.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=152620

Markk will have to locate the point at which he derailed it first. Good luck with that.

I just read through that old thread. I couldn't find any instances of honor or myself (as Markk subsequently claims) 'protecting' Hunter Biden. What I did find was that Markk is simply rehashing the same lines from two years ago without anything new to offer.

Within that thread, I made this remark -

He’s absolutely a celebrity board member, with that name. But I’m poking fun at you for your (1) wild-eyed assertion that this in and of itself indicates ‘corruption’ when it’s a standard practice all over the world, while (2) showing no actual evidence for that corruption, and then (3) your needing to pretend that Biden has no useful legal or banking experience ...

... and this -

.. all I have seen here is responses like canpakes, where all she does is repeat things without acknowledging anything...

I hereby acknowledge (1) that you are incapable of explaining why Trump did not ask the DoJ to investigate a situation that you say we must investigate, (2) that you cannot produce one fact or point of evidence that illustrates any connection between the US aid package and Burisma, and (3) that you cannot answer what level of pay Hunter Biden becomes ‘overpaid’ in the midst of your ranting about Hunter Biden being overpaid, or (4) how ‘overpaid’ then automatically translates into ‘corrupt’.

Two years later, nothing has changed about those observations.

[Markk]

We obviously know, he was not hired for typical reasons…but LOL,I’ll give you that you did not protect him nearly as bad as others did…Pakeswas really guilty on that.

I will assume you can’t answer my simple question.

Your question is effectively a version of asking when a person stopped beating their spouse. Would it matter if your criminal activity from your youth were known to your clients, Markk?

Here's a better way to ask your question that would earn a different response: What do I make of the claims taken based on a reported text message to Hunter's daughter that he wouldn't make her pay half his bills like he has to for his dad? Or the claims that in 2010 he was being asked about payments for repairs at his father's property?

Would you like to rephrase your question in a way that makes it an actual question regarding some form of evidence and not an assumption of guilty?

That’s a cop out…as far as i know Hunter did not beat his wife, however it appears very likely he was paying Joe’s bill’s, or lying to people in his e-mails. So as typically, you avoiding the reality of what may have actually occurred. He was complaining he had to give half his salary to Joe,I didn’t say it, he did. I don’t know if it was clean money or dirty money…but it was monies from Rosemond…so my question is a fair question. He paid Joes bills, that is pretty much accepted, th e question is where was the money generated from. And I haven’t even asked te question why a Millionaire father would MAKE his sone pay his bills.

You now state clearly that Hunter is dirty…so why isn’t it fair to ask this question?

So my question stands,”would it be an issue if Hunter actually paid Joes bills, if the money came for foreign government monies?’” It is not that difficult of a question.

[Markk]

Whatever, scoundrel. It's in a text message from the laptop. It's on record that when Hunter's daughter asked that she was hoping to have a special Sunday breakfast he told her to get in line since he's been having to send the entire family fortune in the form of maple syrup to a person referred to in the text as "short stack". And in an email, there are communications between him and the executor of Joe's estate asking how he should handle contractors pressuring him for payment for the gold plated outdoor gas grill and greek granite replica of the Parthenon breakfast nook Joe had built with big a picture of Winnie the Pooh over the table under a banner, "Our Illustrious Benefactor that No One Suspects Because He's a Bear". No one's fooled by that, just because Pooh loves honey on his 'cakes. Nice try, Biden and 'pany!

So, tell us...who is "short stack", pany? Hmmmmm? Would it matter to YOU if Biden actually received honey from Winnie the Pooh, pany? Would it?!!!

Open your eyes 'cuz you're in a cult. You just don't want to face the facts.

The tile of one E-mail if I remember correctly, in regards to payments are “JRB”….I have to find the e-mail, it’s been a while, I will do so after work later. It was from a associated at Rosemond to Hunter.

This is what I mean about protecting Hunter.

[canpakes]

….I have to find the e-mail, it’s been a while,

Yes, more than two years …

This is what I mean about protecting Hunter.

No one is being ‘protected’ by asking you to provide clear evidence. I’ve essentially been asking you to show us the information or actions that lend credence to your accusations … for a few years, now.

[Marcus]

... So as typically, you avoiding the reality of what may have actually occurred….

I’m still reading this thread, very interesting, but you have yet to provide any evidence. Maybe you didn’t quite intend it this way, but the above comment of yours sums up your approach pretty completely.

“The reality of innuendo and speculation…for which I can provide no real evidence…”

[honorentheos]

Whatever, scoundrel. It's in a text message from the laptop. It's on record that when Hunter's daughter asked that she was hoping to have a special Sunday breakfast he told her to get in line since he's been having to send the entire family fortune in the form of maple syrup to a person referred to in the text as "short stack". And in an email, there are communications between him and the executor of Joe's estate asking how he should handle contractors pressuring him for payment for the gold plated outdoor gas grill and greek granite replica of the Parthenon breakfast nook Joe had built with big a picture of Winnie the Pooh over the table under a banner, "Our Illustrious Benefactor that No One Suspects Because He's a Bear". No one's fooled by that, just because Pooh loves honey on his 'cakes. Nice try, Biden and 'pany!

So, tell us...who is "short stack", pany? Hmmmmm? Would it matter to YOU if Biden actually received honey from Winnie the Pooh, pany? Would it?!!!

Open your eyes 'cuz you're in a cult. You just don't want to face the facts.

The tile of one E-mail if I remember correctly, in regards to payments are “JRB”….I have to find the e-mail, it’s been a while, I will do so after work later. It was from a associated at Rosemond to Hunter.

This is what I mean about protecting Hunter.

"This is what I mean about protecting Hunter."

Notice how you protected yourself from your mistake rather than owning it, correcting yourself, and advancing?

This is what cognitive biases look like in action.

[honorentheos]

You now state clearly that Hunter is dirty…so why isn’t it fair to ask this question?

So my question stands,”would it be an issue if Hunter actually paid Joes bills, if the money came for foreign government monies?’” It is not that difficult of a question.

Start with the evidence, first, not the assumption. Wanna paste the text from Hunter to his daughter that serves as the basis for this claim? Context...

[honorentheos]

For Markk, I wonder if it makes a difference to you that the text being cited is from an argument he is having with his then college aged daughter in 2013? That it appears to be about money, her not being self-supporting, and Hunter issuing it as a threat of cutting her off?

I mean, you call confabulating theories that support your biases "critical thinking" so you could critically think your way into seeing his statement about paying for the family directed at his daughter is saying he pays for his family, (her, her mom, and siblings) full stop. Extending that to Joe Biden seems to be a belief the next line about his having to give 50% of his income to "pop" literally means it applies to Joe. But that's his bitching about paying taxes at a time "pop" was the VP.

What's up with conservatives that you read angry inner family text fights and see liberal Boogeymen in them even when the things being said are essentially the same things you all complain of about your own lives? Ajax could have wrote those texts.