NBC news story on Hunter Biden

[Markk]

Kevin wrote…He said, and I quote, "Emails from the person who was the investigation’s target or subject are required."

Since NONE of the emails in question are from Joe Biden, then NONE of the emails can incriminate him.

"It’s important to remember that hearsay isn’t admissible in court. As a result, I believe there is a long, long road ahead of you before you get anywhere near the president of the United States,”

kevin this is what you said, again you are doubling down on your blanket rants. AD did not say that, yet you claimed he did. That is just not true.

“nothing in any of the emails to implicate the President in anything illegal." You've had nearly two years to sift through the emails,

[Markk]

It looks to me like Eric Schwerin has responsibilities for handling Joe's estate when he was VP because, as VP, he did what VPs and Presidents are supposed to do and remove themselves from financial managment of their assets. Evidence for this? Well, for starters here is Biden's financial disclosure statement from 2010 when the emails were written (submitted by Biden in 2011): http://pfds.opensecrets.org/N00001669_2010.pdf

You'll notice that there are a number of funds organized and identified in that statement including ones mentioned in the emails where Schwerin asks Hunter if he should pay the bills from one of them. Remember that Joe's oldest son, Beau, had been deployed to Iraq when Joe took office as VP in 2009, leaving Hunter as the obvious choice to be executor of the estate at the time. If Hunter has Eric Schwerin managing the financials, what of it? Given what we appear to know, I'd be more concerned Schwerin and Hunter were skimming of his dad while his dad was occupied in Washington.

Again, the essence of the old thread and this thread comes down to supposition and ill intentions aimed at Joe Biden. Regardless of what you say about your feelings, you aren't impartial. You want blood. But the evidence is against you when you get past the "smoke" to the sources.

I am not sure what account Eric handles..but it is understood that a lobbyist, whether former or current, was handling the senators and VP’s accounts…is that a fair statement?

[honorentheos]

I am not sure what account Eric handles..but it is understood that a lobbyist, whether former or current, was handling the senators and VP’s accounts…is that a fair statement?

Is it a meaningful statement is a better question.

If Joe Biden set up trusts from which the expenses for maintenance of his rental property or properties were to be paid, then having someone else manage that when he took office as VP is not only not a crime it's amusing you want to squeeze in suspicion of criminal behavior. It was 2010, Markk. What was Rosemont Seneca doing then that is corruption writ substantial rather than manufactured by your handlers?

I believe your alpha leader Trump was trading favors for Russian money in 2010. A fair statement?

[Markk]

I am not sure what account Eric handles..but it is understood that a lobbyist, whether former or current, was handling the senators and VP’s accounts…is that a fair statement?

Is it a meaningful statement is a better question.

If Joe Biden set up trusts from which the expenses for maintenance of his rental property or properties were to be paid, then having someone else manage that when he took office as VP is not only not a crime it's amusing you want to squeeze in suspicion of criminal behavior. It was 2010, Markk. What was Rosemont Seneca doing then that is corruption writ substantial rather than manufactured by your handlers?

I believe your alpha leader Trump was trading favors for Russian money in 2010. A fair statement?

You were the one that said Eric had power of attorney of Joes accounts. But it did no click with you that Eric was and is a lobbyist. So it is fair to say a lobbyist had power of attorney of JB account…you said it, not me.

In 2010 Eric S was a lobbyist as far back as 2002…and as you conceded he had power of attorney of Joe’s Money? Or he was just paying bills o joint accounts fro his boss’s (hunter) accounts…which is it?

Trump was also peeing on hookers according to the press, he grabbed snatch…and was a billionaire playboy …I hope he does not run again. I hope we have better choices. But he was also falsely accused of things he did not do. Hillary lied to the country and erased e-mails and paid for the dossier, Bill Clinton was probably doing who know what with Epstein, Bush was a idiot that got us into a needless war, Obama split the country apart and didn’t really do anything, and Biden is slipping into dementia before our eyes, and Harris is maybe the most embarrassing political figure in the history of the US x10 …I can be honest with all this, can you?

[honorentheos]

Is it a meaningful statement is a better question.

If Joe Biden set up trusts from which the expenses for maintenance of his rental property or properties were to be paid, then having someone else manage that when he took office as VP is not only not a crime it's amusing you want to squeeze in suspicion of criminal behavior. It was 2010, Markk. What was Rosemont Seneca doing then that is corruption writ substantial rather than manufactured by your handlers?

I believe your alpha leader Trump was trading favors for Russian money in 2010. A fair statement?

You were the one that said Eric had power of attorney of Joes accounts. But it did no click with your that Eric was and is a lobbyist. So it is fair to say a lobbyist had power of attorney of JB account…you said it, not me.

In 2010 Eric S was a lobbyist as far back as 2002…and as you conceded he had power of attorney of Joe’s Money? Or he was just paying bills o joint accounts fro his boss’s (hunter) accounts…which is it?

You aren't saying anything meaningful. Apparently this is a different facet of you not understanding what makes something an ad hominin rather than just an insult, too.

You are repeating innuendo from your handlers inciting you to bark in a direction while obvious, malicious acts of the type you imagine were being committed by folks like Paul Manafort. Lamanites are everywhere according to your imagination as your handlers built a billion dollar fund with your tithes of blind faith.

[canpakes]

I don’t think that ‘all this boils down to a cell phone bill’, but you’ve presented the cellphone anecdote as emblematic of something. That something appears to be - absent any actual evidence from you - legal business proceedings.

That is exactly the point. You weren’t paying attention.
; )

No I didn’t, I presented a fact that a investment firm ran and owned by lobbyists, owned by the VP’s son, was paying the VP’s bills. It has nothing to do with what bills were paid, but that bills were being paid…your straw man feel before it was written.

It’s not a straw man to ask you to show good evidence of what you’re claiming, or to ask you to explain why you believe it’s illegal. ; )

[Jersey Girl]

Still following. Markk will you please define 'strawman' as you are using it here? Thanks.

[Markk]

You were the one that said Eric had power of attorney of Joes accounts. But it did no click with your that Eric was and is a lobbyist. So it is fair to say a lobbyist had power of attorney of JB account…you said it, not me.

In 2010 Eric S was a lobbyist as far back as 2002…and as you conceded he had power of attorney of Joe’s Money? Or he was just paying bills o joint accounts fro his boss’s (hunter) accounts…which is it?

You aren't saying anything meaningful. Apparently this is a different facet of you not understanding what makes something an ad hominin rather than just an insult, too.

You are repeating innuendo from your handlers inciting you to bark in a direction while obvious, malicious acts of the type you imagine were being committed by folks like Paul Manafort. Lamanites are everywhere according to your imagination as your handlers built a billion dollar fund with your tithes of blind faith.

LOL…You said that Eric had power of attorney, i didn’t,nor did my handlers (my wife and my dog LOL are the only people i report too) incite anything you did. Please show where i repeated anything. You again said that Eric had power of attorney over Joes accounts in 2010. Okay, but Eric is a lobbyist by trade. I again did not claim this, you did. I am not sure what all this means, as I claimed it is just more smoke.

Paul Manafort is probably corrupt…okay throw him is jail.

As far lamanites, i guess that is a some sort of escape from the corner you backed yourself into. Okay I am Samual…shoot arrows at me. LOL.

But anyways, did Eric S have power of attorney of Joes account or not? LOL I will wait for that answer.

Honor..you have to laugh at all this…these guys are so corrupt and just as much oligarchs as MZ and others, I don’t know why you defend them. Yeah joe makes about the same as I do a year, yet he has 18 million or so, or what ever he has in the bank, and I am doing okay, not complaints, but hardly a millionaire, let alone a multi millionaire. But hey, if I had a lobbyist as an accountant, maybe I would be?

[canpakes]

Obama split the country apart …

It has been my experience so far that the folks who repeat this line cannot explain what they mean by it.

The same folks, more often than not, voted for a guy who actually did spend the better part of all of his days in office tweeting things that actually were designed to tear the country apart. ; )

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1186561

[Markk]

Still following. Markk will you please define 'strawman' as you are using it here? Thanks.

NO…I tell you what..instead of just being a nanny, actually take th e lead in the conversation. Honor and pakes can stand down, and you can take over? Fair.Do you have any idea what we are discussing?