Kevin posted a couple of very informative quotes from people who really know what they are talking. I noticed Markk has not engaged them. I suspect he probably did not read them….
No what kevin did is paste and run, and I asked him to give a momentary, and he did again but added a few bold’s. If he want to actually discuss it fine, I will, but he needs to engage. I am already behind answer question from people that want to engage.
But I tell you what Marcus, goo back and read what he wrote and engae with me on it…make point in your words, and certainly use his paste as cf…Themis can do so also…and I promise I will get to answering you…or just continue to be a DH….designated heckler.
Lol. I must have missed your response to Morley's comment AND my comment, both quoted below.
I would say that a male who identifies as a woman should be allowed to have all the abortions they want. What do you think?
Markk’s criteria is also problematic in another way— it would imply that if it is impossible for a woman to “get pregnant through natural means,” then that woman should also lose “the right to choose to have an abortion.“
Or maybe you didn't read them, which would explain the inaccuracy of your "designated heckler" comment. That's okay, you have another chance now!
Please tell me how I am wrong here…the only way a biological man/male does don’t have a penis is if they are a medical issue. Correct me if I am wrong here…heck.
You said, " A healthy male has what is called penis". Does that mean you don't have a dick?
And you are all of the sudden a medical doctor now.
Last edited by doubtingthomas on Sun May 08, 2022 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus.
Jersey Girl…do you realize the men here are crapping on you as a woman
Why would you talk to a woman like that? Of course, it is easy to disrespect a woman on the internet, but it is clear you don't have any balls in real life.
"I have the type of (REAL) job where I can choose how to spend my time," says Marcus.
Jersey Girl…do you realize the men here are crapping on you as a woman and saying basically anyone can be a women you don’t here them saying that a man can’t be defined.
Do you realize that your comment there has NOTHING to do with what I wrote?
it is clearly stated women can not contract this disease
Explain Swyer, Aphallia, and Female pseudohermaphroditism.
Make your point, you tried that with your last point and failed miserably and didn’t even understand your smoking gun was actually a disease that only a biological male can have, and you kept doubling down not even recognizing that fact. You must have finally figured that out and went searching for another medical condition or something similar.
But I will google and read what the things are and wait for you to explain what each one is and your point.
Please tell me how I am wrong here…the only way a biological man/male does don’t have a penis is if they are a medical issue. Correct me if I am wrong here…heck.
You said, " A healthy male has what is called penis". Does that mean you don't have a dick?
And you are all of the sudden a medical doctor now.
LOL…I guess you didn’t figure it out. In context of this discussion it means a biological male that does not have a very rare disease, that does not allow his sexual organs to fully develop do to a either full or partial lack of androgens.
The first part of the article reads…” Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS) is genetic condition that affects the sexual development of a male fetus. During pregnancy, male fetuses with PAIS are unable to properly respond to male sex hormones (androgens). As a result, this affects the development of the genitals.”
CAIS…is when the male fetus does not respond at all to androgens and their external sexual genitals “appear” to be female, but they do not have ovaries or a uterus because they are males, with underdeveloped genitals. They are in no way shape or form a biological female.
CAIS…is when the male fetus does not respond at all to androgens and their external sexual genitals “appear” to be female, but they do not have ovaries or a uterus because they are males, with underdeveloped genitals. They are in no way shape or form a biological female.
Make your point, you tried that with your last point and failed miserably and didn’t even understand your smoking gun was actually [irrelevant], and you kept doubling down not even recognizing that fact. You must have finally figured that out and went searching for another [irrelevancy] or something similar.
But I will google and read what the things are and wait for you to explain what each one is and your point.
Huh. You noticed that tactic? in someone else’s post? Now where have we seen that before. Let me think…..
