Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by Res Ipsa »

Kishkumen wrote:
Tue May 17, 2022 12:02 am
Res Ipsa wrote:
Mon May 16, 2022 11:04 pm
For someone who is LDS to describe someone as soulless is to say they are something other than human. After all, LDS theology says all humans have souls, doesn’t it? Religious fanatics spouting eliminationist rhetoric qualifies as scary, in my book.
Yeah, if what I had said only allowed that outcome, then I would understand this response. But what I said is that not all religiously motivated politics is scary. Example I offered was Blair Hodges, who is a Mormon progressive, whom I do not find scary.
Ah, sorry, I don’t know Blair Hodges and knew nothing of his politics. I was focused on the Freedom Forum types that appear to be dropping in off late.
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
honorentheos
God
Posts: 4352
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by honorentheos »

Fred wrote:
Mon May 16, 2022 2:06 pm
It is my belief that all democrats, without exception, are among the third part of spirits in the pre-existence that saw the advantage of following Lucifer with a body, as opposed to getting kicked out with him.
Source for this apocryphal claim that a third of the hosts supported Lucifer but came to mortality rather than be kicked out? I'm requesting you provide the LDS authority for this specific version of the divide between spirits.
User avatar
High Spy
Savior (mortal ministry)
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 12:26 pm
Location: Up in the sky, HI 🌺
Contact:

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by High Spy »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Mon May 16, 2022 11:04 pm

For someone who is LDS to describe someone as soulless is to say they are something other than human. After all, LDS theology says all humans have souls, doesn’t it? Religious fanatics spouting eliminationist rhetoric qualifies as scary, in my book.
Hawaiians would describe them as haole, which means ‘without spirit.’

The LDS Bible Dictionary once defined the soul as the spirit and the body together.

Therefore haoles are soulless.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7866
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by Moksha »

Hey, somebody besides Elizabeth has migrated from the LDS Freedom Forum.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9710
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

High Spy wrote:
Tue May 17, 2022 5:55 am
Res Ipsa wrote:
Mon May 16, 2022 11:04 pm

For someone who is LDS to describe someone as soulless is to say they are something other than human. After all, LDS theology says all humans have souls, doesn’t it? Religious fanatics spouting eliminationist rhetoric qualifies as scary, in my book.
Hawaiians would describe them as haole, which means ‘without spirit.’

The LDS Bible Dictionary once defined the soul as the spirit and the body together.

Therefore haoles are soulless.
The logic is impeccable.

- Doc
K Graham
God
Posts: 1676
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2021 6:25 am

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by K Graham »

David Bokovoy and Brian Hauglid and Daniel McClellan are also Democrats.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal" - Ajax18
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9710
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Should Democrats be allowed in Temples?

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

K Graham wrote:
Tue May 17, 2022 4:14 pm
David Bokovoy and Brian Hauglid and Daniel McClellan are also Democrats.
Soulless Democrats. Anyway. Waitin’ on that reference for the 1/3, Fred.

- Doc
Post Reply