Is this true, or just a conspiracy that you believe?
Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
-
- God
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
- Location: On the imaginary axis
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Yes, but long experience in England led someone to make up this little rhyme a few centuries back:
If Trump is convicted of a treasonous act, that will only strengthen the determination of Trump and his supporters to get him back into power.Treason doth never prosper - what's the reason?
Why, if it prospers, then 'tis never treason!
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
-
- God
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:51 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Doesn't really matter as Biden can just classify them as Top Secret now that he's President and Trump had no right to steal them in the first place. But yeah, this idea that Trump can just magically declassify 15 boxes of classified docs with a wave of his hand is nonsense. There is a process that has to be implemented and each document has to be designated as such.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:34 pmThere is going to be a lot of legal wrangling around the presidents ability to "declassify" documents, and the process thereof. Classified material for the most part is still considered classified until it has been remarked, and the knowledge of the declassification disseminated. Can a president ad-hoc declassify nuclear weapons related documents?
Regardless - there are other laws governing the releasing of "national defense" related documents independent of classification. One such 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information - I believe Trump himself signed into law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
The big ?? one must ask "to what end did Trump take TS/SCI type nuclear weapon related documents into his possession?" and store them in such a slipshod manner.
I suspect these docs relating to nukes aren't as sensitive as the media is making out, but I could be wrong. It is just unfathomable that anyone would leave office, steal sensitive docs relating to nuclear capabilities and then just throw them in a shed out by the pool.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal ...(there are) mentally challenged people with special needs like myself- Ajax18
-
- God
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:51 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Moron doesn't understand the importance of anonymity and probably mumbles "rat" under his breath while typing this.
"I am not an American ... In my view premarital sex should be illegal ...(there are) mentally challenged people with special needs like myself- Ajax18
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
I understand the importance of anonymity and never mumbled “rat”. Have you any other lie, fantasies or conspiracies?
-
- Priest
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:33 pm
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
11 sets of classified docs including at least on TS/SCI.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/12/politics ... index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/12/politics ... index.html
-
- God
- Posts: 9710
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
This is espionage.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 6:50 pm11 sets of classified docs including at least on TS/SCI.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/12/politics ... index.html
- Doc
-
- Priest
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:33 pm
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
I used to hold a TS/SCI clearance. I'd be in federal custody already. President is the ultimate arbitrator of classified vs declassified but there is some process involved. Even if he claims and is able to make stick the claims he declassed the documents, if they contained information re "national security/military" and it appears he was trying to disseminate or through negligence had disseminated the information - he faces significant legal jeopardy.
Again the question I ask is "WHY DID HE TAKE THESE DOCUMENTS"" - to what end?
Again the question I ask is "WHY DID HE TAKE THESE DOCUMENTS"" - to what end?
-
- God
- Posts: 6500
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:34 am
- Location: That's the difference. I actually have a Blue Heeler
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2022/08/10/ ... it-n488788
There is a conspiracy our there and we are going to honor it!
Some anonymous sources are funnier than other anonymous sources. But hey, get your conspiracy hats on. This is HUGE.But it was only a week or so ago that a US attorney decided to go to a Florida judge to seek a search warrant. The judge agreed and the FBI began planning the search for a time when Trump would not be there. The story points to the FBI’s focus on a few specific areas as proof they knew where to look. But curiously this story doesn’t mention the June meeting between investigators and Trump’s lawyers when they looked through some of the documents kept in a basement storage room. In other words, the DOJ didn’t need a secret source to know the documents were kept in that particular room because they’d seen them there themselves and, at the time, not taken them.
There is a conspiracy our there and we are going to honor it!
- Morley
- God
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm
- Location: Ferdinand Hodler, Self-Portrait (1912). Attractively Art Nouveau-ish.
Re: Mar-A-Lago Legally Searched by FBI
Exactly. It's the answer to this question that everything is going to hinge on.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Fri Aug 12, 2022 7:12 pm
Again the question I ask is "WHY DID HE TAKE THESE DOCUMENTS"" - to what end?