"Riots in the streets" if Trump indicted

[Binger]

My post in MDO's post is edited in red. Very red.

So? The quote of your post was not “edited in red.” The color of the font was changed from black to red, which I would assume was done by MDO for emphasis. Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

Check your rulebook, buddy.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

No. Like I said and like I quoted in my response. Asking for a conviction based on one's willingness to commit a crime that the FBI set up and invited others to commit with the agents of the FBI is frightening. We do that in this country, and it is frightening, or dicey. Just like going to a war based on a premise or an assumption is scary, so is incarcerating our citizens based on what a jury may feel the citizen may by willing to do rather than what they did do.

I really have a hard time following your narrative as opposed to the facts. The FBI was not putting a gun to Trump's head, forcing him to hold on to classified documents.

If Donald Trump is NOT prosecuted, who will trust the United States Government to keep secrets?

You’ll note, with no proof whatsoever, Bing Bong just waves away your question and asserts the FBI, headed by Trump-appointed Christopher Wray, is literally conspiring (with whom?) and creating a fabricated crime that entraps, somehow, Trump staff or even Trump himself, into stealing, hiding, and lying about the classified information in question.

Makes you wonder what someone like Bing Bong would do if placed in a position of responsibility since he projects so much horse crap onto the feds.

- Doc

(highlight switched to purple. -cp-)

[canpakes]

Did I miss something though? Did Res or Panny edit my post again?

If I edited a post of yours, I would say so. In red.

Same here. All edits that I’ve made within existing posts written by others will be in red, with my initials. No edits to a portion of any particular sentence in an existing post will be done without the color change and initials. Mod comments follow the same protocol.

Binger may be confusing ‘edits’ with partial post quoting, which everyone does.

(Binger, you know the difference, correct?)

[Binger]

I really have a hard time following your narrative as opposed to the facts. The FBI was not putting a gun to Trump's head, forcing him to hold on to classified documents.

If Donald Trump is NOT prosecuted, who will trust the United States Government to keep secrets?

You’ll note, with no proof whatsoever, Bing Bong just waves away your question and asserts the FBI, headed by Trump-appointed Christopher Wray, is literally conspiring (with whom?) and creating a fabricated crime that entraps, somehow, Trump staff or even Trump himself, into stealing, hiding, and lying about the classified information in question.

Makes you wonder what someone like Bing Bong would do if placed in a position of responsibility since he projects so much horse crap onto the feds.

- Doc

Try not lying, docky. Try it.

The conversation, including the quote in red ink above, was about a link related to Whitmer. You know that, but chose to conflate and lie, as usual.

[Res Ipsa]

So? The quote of your post was not “edited in red.” The color of the font was changed from black to red, which I would assume was done by MDO for emphasis. Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

Check your rulebook, buddy.

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

[canpakes]

Check your rulebook, buddy.

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

A dependence upon insinuation and dishonesty … that is what non-credible people (frauds) do. : D

Decisions, decisions …

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

You’ll note, with no proof whatsoever, Bing Bong just waves away your question and asserts the FBI, headed by Trump-appointed Christopher Wray, is literally conspiring (with whom?) and creating a fabricated crime that entraps, somehow, Trump staff or even Trump himself, into stealing, hiding, and lying about the classified information in question.

Makes you wonder what someone like Bing Bong would do if placed in a position of responsibility since he projects so much horse crap onto the feds.

- Doc

Try not lying, docky. Try it.

The conversation, including the quote in red ink above, was about a link related to Whitmer. You know that, but chose to conflate and lie, as usual.

Actually, MDO and I lost the narrative because the thread started out as one thing, but Hawkeye derailed it which we went with. I’ll give you this one, though.

That said, with regard to OP my point stands unless you changed your mind ref Trump, classified information, and the DoJ.

- Doc

[Binger]

Check your rulebook, buddy.

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

It is your rulebook, not mine. But sure, do whatever you do and think whatever you think.

[Res Ipsa]

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

It is your rulebook, not mine. But sure, do whatever you do and think whatever you think.

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

[Binger]

It is your rulebook, not mine. But sure, do whatever you do and think whatever you think.

Insinuating that Canpakes or I “edited” your post is flat out dishonest.

The ink was red, Res. Relax and lighten up. Your feigned indignation is dishonest. Jesus Christ.