Even if there were some or even a lot of truth to the above screed, none of it invalidates the points just made by Dr. Steuss.ajax18 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:01 amI can see ways in which indigence is an advantage. Have you ever noticed that the most rude and agressive motorists with illegally tinted front windows are often times the same people who are driving intoxicated, without auto insurance, or perhaps even with a warrant out for his arrest. And the most courteous and nonconfrontational are often the workaholic evil rich people. The rich man knows that if he hurts someone he stands to lose millions in civil court whether it's his fault or not. He avoids crashes because he knows he'll have to pay for the wreck either with immediate cash or a higher insurance rate. He avoids getting pulled over for any reason lest the police find some excuse to confiscate his property. The thug sees a ticket as costing him a no more than a few minutes of time for the officer to write it but knows he'll never have to pay it. It costs the police department too much to haul him into jail. And they'd never tow his car for driving without insurance like they would someone who holds a legal full time job. He knows his legal fees are paid by the state. And he doesn't need to worry about lost wages because he doesn't hold a job, at least not a legal job on the books. And he's immune to civil damages for maiming and killing someone while driving wrecklessly. All that matters to the thug is getting where he's going right now. He's immune to taxes, alimony, and child support He knows he'll never get audited since he's a registered Democrat.
viewtopic.php?p=2805776#p2805776
One of the peculiarities of the English language -- two words pronounced exactly the same with seemingly almost diametrically opposed definitions.
