How do you explain the 19% gap for 18-29 or the 23% gap for 18 to 25? and the 21.5% gap for 26-33.
The pattern for a long time has been women generally marry men older than they and then outlive the men. Is there something about the statistic that this observation does not explain?
Perhaps Thomas you could explain what your concern is.
The pattern for a long time has been women generally marry men older than they and then outlive the men. Is there something about the statistic that this observation does not explain?
I completely agree! Women getting with older men is the biggest factor, but RI and Marcus accused me of picking, "snippets from various sources and then stitch them together in an an interpretation that is not consistent with the entire collection of data" when I said the same thing as you.
The pattern for a long time has been women generally marry men older than they and then outlive the men. Is there something about the statistic that this observation does not explain?
I completely agree! Women getting with older men is the biggest factor, but RI and Marcus accused me of picking, "snippets from various sources and then stitch them together in an an interpretation that is not consistent with the entire collection of data" when I said the same thing as you.
Perhaps Thomas you could explain what your concern is.
I'll come back to explain my concerns, but right now a concern is that Marcus is blaming me and accusing me of misogyny for no reason.
You doing the same damn thing over and over, DT. Now you are taking incomplete snippets of things I've said and quoting them completely out of context. It's the same thing you do with published papers. You grab a snippet that you think supports something you already believe and then ignore everything else, including the context and the conclusions. You've seized on one statistic from one article and are treating it like absolute truth. You know better.
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
You doing the same damn thing over and over, DT. Now you are taking incomplete snippets of things I've said and quoting them completely out of context. It's the same thing you do with published papers. You grab a snippet that you think supports something you already believe and then ignore everything else, including the context and the conclusions. You've seized on one statistic from one article and are treating it like absolute truth. You know better.
I question everything, I'm not treating it like gospel truth.
How would you explain 21.5% gap between single men and women ages 26-33? Or is the 21.5% gap completely wrong?
You doing the same damn thing over and over, DT. Now you are taking incomplete snippets of things I've said and quoting them completely out of context. It's the same thing you do with published papers. You grab a snippet that you think supports something you already believe and then ignore everything else, including the context and the conclusions. You've seized on one statistic from one article and are treating it like absolute truth. You know better.
I question everything, I'm not treating it like gospel truth.
How would you explain 21.5% gap between single men and women ages 26-33? Or is the 21.5% gap completely wrong?
How am I misrepresenting the data? Instead of focusing on the personal attacks, you should answer the question. 
