This thread is wild.Hawkeye wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:30 amWhite guys with more money than her family has. Or maybe black professional athletes, musicians, like the Kardashians. I'm not saying that these relationships end up lasting long enough to see the kids start kindergarten.Mexican girls like white guys.
Who do the white girls like?
Doubting Thomas I think you're starting to see how liberal political correctness makes it impossible to have an honest conversation about things as they really are. As a white man who has lived in Latin America and at BYU, most of us know very well the difference in our market value in these two dating scenes. But you can't state the obvious because this hurts liberal snowflake feelings and you'll be disparaged and censored as a racist, sexist, mysoginist, homphobe.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:12 amI am not implying that Mexicans are inferior, and I think it's okay for educated women to be picky.Jersey Girl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:09 am
I took your words as you wrote them. And yes, I agree they were wrong.
Many of my comments are meant to be a response to Marcus's double standard.
Yes, DT. Take advice from a man who absolutely detests his wife and only lives because he loves his kids (as if that’s some measure of success).Hawkeye wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:38 amDoubting Thomas I think you're starting to see how liberal political correctness makes it impossible to have an honest conversation about things as they really are. As a white man who has lived in Latin America and at BYU, most of us know very well the difference in our market value in these two dating scenes. But you can't state the obvious because this hurts liberal snowflake feelings and you'll be disparaged and censored as a racist, sexist, mysoginist, homphobe.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:12 amI am not implying that Mexicans are inferior, and I think it's okay for educated women to be picky.
Many of my comments are meant to be a response to Marcus's double standard.
Stereotyping, misogyny and bigotry, all rolled into one obnoxious statement. Compliments, Ajax.Hawkeye wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 1:22 amI'd like to see an example of this ever actually happening.Because 2-income earners are now setting house prices, and a man making less money might mean she pays him alimony.
If a woman makes $200k/year and she's even slightly attractive, she's not going to be willing to get into a relationship with any man who makes less than that. These kind of women often find themselves alone because no man has much to offer her.
Giselle isn't paying Tom alimony. And any man who is successful enough in his own career to be good enough for her isn't going to be willing to give up his career to be her househusband. Any man willing to be her househusband won't be good enough for her.
She may prefer to partner with someone who would remain more committed to their children.
Really, so for the sake of her children she divorced their biological Dad? Now she's going to go find a stepdad who will be more committed to them? That's complete nonsense. She divorced Tom Brady because she didn't get what she wanted for herself. She inarguably did it for herself and her immediate self-interests, not for the sake of her kids.He already has a 15 year old son from a relationship that he walked away from.
And this is one of the most damaging misinformation revenge capmaigns too many women have carried out against their baby Daddy. They convince the children that their Dad walked away from the marriage because he didn't want the kids. When the reality is that the mother unilaterally took the kids away from their father because he wouldn't agree to her terms for a relationship. These kids grow up hating their father and thinking he doesn't love them, and from what I've seen (at least in my own culture and community) that is rarely ever true.She may prefer to partner with someone who would remain more committed to their children.
The question is, however, whether she would enjoy it too. That's the point you need to concentrate on.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:03 pmI would enjoy dating an attractive (or an average-looking) woman with more academic accomplishments than me, but I probably have better odds of winning the lottery.
Nope. I think he is on the right lines. You just don't understand how your posts look to most people, I suspect.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 03, 2022 11:03 pmAnyways, Marcus shouldn't be accusing me of treating women like objects, would you agree?
It can work that way (for commitment to the kids). It’s not as if Brady gets to play only in home games. And I don’t think that he wants to return to playing simply for charitable reasons. I suspect he is satisfying his own self-interest, too. Do you disagree?Hawkeye wrote: ↑Sun Dec 04, 2022 6:00 pmReally, so for the sake of her children she divorced their biological Dad? Now she's going to go find a stepdad who will be more committed to them? That's complete nonsense. She divorced Tom Brady because she didn't get what she wanted for herself. She inarguably did it for herself and her immediate self-interests, not for the sake of her kids.He already has a 15 year old son from a relationship that he walked away from.
He didn’t insist on staying with Moynihan, even after finding out she was pregnant.And this is one of the most damaging misinformation revenge capmaigns too many women have carried out against their baby Daddy. They convince the children that their Dad walked away from the marriage because he didn't want the kids.She may prefer to partner with someone who would remain more committed to their children.
That didn’t happen the first time around for Brady. I suspect that it won’t happen that way the second time around, either.When the reality is that the mother unilaterally took the kids away from their father because he wouldn't agree to her terms for a relationship. These kids grow up hating their father and thinking he doesn't love them, and from what I've seen (at least in my own culture and community) that is rarely ever true.