doubtingthomas’s topics MEGATHREAD

[Marcus]

stop talking about women as though they are things.

I added this

Women in places like Spain are nicer and aren't afraid (or as concerned) of men there. In Mexico, women are nicer to men because they need a man to survive and make it in life.

Hopefully it makes sense to you.

stop talking about women as though they are things.

[Marcus]

He’s 100% that stupid.

Here, Doc!

Women in places like Spain are nicer and aren't afraid (or as concerned) of men there. In Mexico, women are nicer to men because they need a man to survive and make it in life.

Does that make sense?

stop talking about women as though they are things.

[Marcus]

Yeah. If you said that people in those places are nicer, you might still be wrong, but at least you wouldn't be sexist.

I have said plenty of times that women tend to be better people than men. I say women are nicer (to men) in other countries because that's what other guys tell me. I've seen it myself with tourists, they are very approachable.

Women in places like Spain are nicer and aren't afraid (or as concerned) of men there. In Mexico, women are nicer to men because they need a man to survive and make it in life.

Men are not entitled to have sex [with another person]. Full stop. Women are not entitled to have sex [with another person]. Full stop. Aspirations are not entitlements.

I agree. By the way, it's a lot easier to be friendly to a woman, than to a man, according to Ian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vn5zVGGJz4

you've used this source before. here's an opinion about your source.

I've said it before, Vaush and his community has a huge problem with women. He uses a lot of gender slurs and i tried calling it out before and his minions got defensive. Gender slurs aren't okay, they are regressive as “F”, and he needs to stop pandering to incels.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FragileMaleRed ... a/hgveqmj/

[doubtingthomas]

you've used this source before. here's an opinion about your source.

Here's another opinion.

https://apnews.com/press-release/busine ... 5de9397676

Men are terrified thanks to radical feminism.

[Marcus]

you've used this source before. here's an opinion about your source.

Here's another opinion.

https://apnews.com/press-release/busine ... 5de9397676

Men are terrified thanks to radical feminism.

That article says nothing like that. And it expresses no opinion on Vaughn.

[Father Francis]

Here's another opinion.

https://apnews.com/press-release/busine ... 5de9397676

Men are terrified thanks to radical feminism.

That article says nothing like that. And it expresses no opinion on Vaughn.

I actually just sat through the whole video offered by DT. It was kind of sad. So much backpedaling, equivocating and at least one dog whistle.

They complain that they're expected to understand women's apprehension at being approached by random men. Then they dismissively describe legitimate reasons why women might be apprehensive. Then they give the "nice guy" argument saying that women need to be more understanding of men being apprehensive about approaching random women lest they be labeled a "creep". They called fear of flirting the number one fear of young white males, because they might be taken for a creep. They blame this all on the Left.

I'm a straight white male and have never been afraid to flirt. Maybe because I do it when it seems like something's there and don't just drool on anyone I find attractive? Maybe because I step lightly and back off if there's no reciprocation? Some of those women might have thought I was a creep due to so many bad interactions in the past. I don't take it personally and I move on. This whole MRM is nonsense. Men have pretty much had the run of the place for all of human history. Then again, these type of people don't think hundreds of years of black slavery matters now.

ETA: the dude constantly twirls and even brushes his moustache in the video. Bizarre.

[Doctor Steuss]

It's not a small mistake, and it's one you frequently make. I point it out because your tendency to do so erodes your credibility.

It's a pernicious habit of (lazily) working backwards, and using google to haphazardly skim things to support an already formed opinion. I imagine it has worked (and probably continues to) in other venues, which is why he keeps doing it.

My favorite example of this to date is when he approvingly offered up a new-age grifter who only went by the name "Reason" as an authoritative source on pharmacokinetics.

May the gods bless you, Marcus, Res Ipsa, and others who are still putting in the effort to help him hopefully break this habit.

[doubtingthomas]

I'm a straight white male and have never been afraid to flirt.

Many pick-up artist coaches disagree with you. Here's a discussion between Alex (an expert pick-up artist coach) and Ian. Alex is a Democrat and knows damned well how messed up things are for young men these days.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fP9kYgt5UrA

Here's another pick-up artist coach, who is also a Democrat.

"Women find 80% of men unattractive"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XltNgsN_SDI

Or read this news article. Most men are terrified according to the article.

https://apnews.com/press-release/busine ... 5de9397676

Things are very different with the younger generations. Young guys are expected to be mind readers before attempting to flirt with a girl. You also have to take into account the regions. It's probably very easy to flirt with women in the state of UTAH.

They called fear of flirting the number one fear of young white males, because they might be taken for a creep. They blame this all on the Left.

There seems to be an obsession in many parts of the US with the creeps. Guys are assumed to be creeps until they prove they are not. It's a guilty until proven innocent mass hysteria.

That mass hysteria doesn't exists in places like Europe or Mexico.

May the gods bless you, Marcus, Res Ipsa, and others who are still putting in the effort to help him hopefully break this habit.

I am sorry for the terrible mistake of calling it "study" instead of "editorial" or "paper". The editorial does reference many studies, but I somehow made a big mistake.

If you said that people in those places are nicer, you might still be wrong, but at least you wouldn't be sexist.

If I said that white girls are nicer than black girls, nobody would accuse me of sexism. Everyone would accuse me of something else. Why exactly is my claim about women in other countries sexist?

Men are not entitled to have sex [with another person]. Full stop. Women are not entitled to have sex [with another person]. Full stop. Aspirations are not entitlements.

Again, I agree. I am not sure why you are ignoring the problems pointed out in the editorial.

[Marcus]

...If I said that white girls are nicer than black girls, nobody would accuse me of sexism...

Yes, we would. We ALL would. You are stereotyping on the basis of sex. The is the definition of sexism. EVERYONE HERE WOULD SAY THAT IS SEXISM.

[doubtingthomas]

...If I said that white girls are nicer than black girls, nobody would accuse me of sexism...

Yes, we would. We ALL would. You are stereotyping on the basis of sex. The is the definition of sexism. EVERYONE HERE WOULD SAY THAT IS SEXISM.

That's stereotyping on the basis of race, not sex. I recommend you take some HR training courses or do some research on the EEOC website.

If I said that guys are nicer than girls, that would be sexism.