doubtingthomas’s topics MEGATHREAD

[doubtingthomas]

“But the evidence does not support a relationship between violence and a short supply of women,” he said.

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/male-domin ... study-says

That may be true in Asian countries, but the US is different.

[doubtingthomas]

A new thread is necessary because of the fact that multiple people are misrepresenting my words.

According to a paper, "Loneliness can lead to various psychiatric disorders"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4225959/

The vast majority of people who don't have a partner are not dangerous, but reducing loneliness can help reduce the number of violent crimes.

Reducing poverty does reduce crime too, same principle.

There is not a single sentence in that article that references the violence and violent crimes that you've been bringing up.

Are you saying that most criminals don't have psychiatric disorders? Anyways, having a good girlfriend can help reduce crime.
"The results showed that marriage reduced recidivism compared to nonmarriage only when the spouse had no criminal record"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964922/

[Marcus]

You didn't read your link, did you. The 'typical' argument is wrong, and the article explains why. Here's the author of the paper it's discussing.

It is true that most perpetrators and victims of violence are men. “It isn’t surprising that arguments of more men leading to more violence dominate discussions, this could create such an effect,” said Ryan Schacht, a co-author of the paper and doctoral researcher at UC Davis.

“But the evidence does not support a relationship between violence and a short supply of women,” he said.

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/male-domin ... study-says

Its not hard to figure out why you made that mistake though, and why you linked it to a subtle threat about someone's daughter. It's a common assumption in misogynistic incel thought.

That may be true in Asian countries, but the US is different.

And you STILL haven't read your own source. From the paper YOU originally referenced...

To take an empirical approach to this question in humans, we collated the data of human behavioral ecologists who have collected largely comparable demographic data in primarily predemographic transition, small-scale communities across the world 28, 29.

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/male-domin ... study-says

[Marcus]

There is not a single sentence in that article that references the violence and violent crimes that you've been bringing up.

Are you saying that most criminals don't have psychiatric disorders? Anyways, having a good girlfriend can help reduce crime.
"The results showed that marriage reduced recidivism compared to nonmarriage only when the spouse had no criminal record"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964922/

Your reference does NOT say "having a good girlfriend can help reduce crime." Not at all. And once again, you are speaking about women as though they are things. Stop.

[doubtingthomas]

Yesterday’s Anti-Mormon “Lies” Are Today’s Church Essays. Yesterday's DT's "Lies" are Today's National News.

CNN reports
1. Men are in trouble.
2. The gap between single men and women has increased since 2019.
3. More men are giving up. MGTW is growing.
4. A record 63% of men in their 20s are single - almost double the number of women.
5. Mentions the correlation between loneliness and misogyny.
6. Wans of the birth crisis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK4y6C1Uuhw

Unfortunately, CNN didn't have the guts to admit that a lot of women are dating a Laundrie. There's no evidence that the Laundrie's of the world are more lonely than before.

Anyways, I know we (this board) don't care about single men. However, to end misogyny it's necessary to end loneliness first.

As Marcus quoted

From your link

Men who fail to attach to partners, careers, or communities often grow bitter and seek volatility and unrest. They’re more susceptible to fringe theories and they over-index on online forums filled with conspiracy theories, misogynistic content and misinformation.

To be entirely clear, I am not someone who will fail to find a partner. It's easy to date LDS girls and Mexicans.

[Doctor Steuss]

Pathological.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=157155

[doubtingthomas]

I won't be surprised if this gets ignored. This is so damning to radical feminism.

Here's the full report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK4y6C1Uuhw

[doubtingthomas]

Pathological.

I'll give this board one more chance thanks to Shades. "doubtingthomas, you’ll notice that the thread wherein the accusation was made was also moved out of sight, so that person isn’t receiving special treatment."

Anyways, aren't the issues more important than my personality?

[canpakes]

Well, that was quick.

Men survived evolution, the creation of modern society, bubonic plague, the Crusades, two world wars, bell bottoms and a multitude of recessions and depressions, and have finally been done in by … women achieving a rough parity in employment pay.

[doubtingthomas]

Well, that was quick.

Men survived evolution, the creation of modern society, bubonic plague, the Crusades, two world wars, bell bottoms and a multitude of recessions and depressions, and have finally been done in by … women achieving a rough parity in employment pay.

Or perhaps the problem is that the majority of young women are mostly attracted to the top 10% of men and the Laundries.

Another problem is that men in their early 20s are not allowed to talk to younger women. I am not in my early 20s, so I am not sure why people get upset at me for saying that.