Secular folks should worry.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
honorentheos
God
Posts: 4298
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by honorentheos »

Gadianton wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:33 am
Your Trump and DeSantis and Keri Lake, and Mike Lindell, all your favorite people are so utterly ridiculous that yeah, GenZ may go a little to far left to make sure that sh*t never happens on their watch, and I wouldn't be able to blame them for it.
That's what remains interesting in all this, in my opinion. Take gun control for example. We've had about twenty years of ever increasing resistance to enacting increasingly popular "common sense" bipartisan laws as the rhetoric from the NRA and Second Amendment types asserted it was a zero sum game. Now, as the generation that grew up with a very real fear of school shootings becomes the majority voting demographic, the Second Amendment types may have unintentionally created conditions where the resulting gun legislation that does get passed (and it will eventually) will be much closer to their feared restrictions than had they sought common ground among moderates. Had they actually cared about responsibility when it came to gun ownership, they might not have lost a generation of voters to that issue.

I see in MG the same rhetoric. Religion is threatened by a zero sum game of its own creation as it attacked climate change, evolutionary science, gender issues and human rights. And the generation facing the worst consequences of science denial and has more awareness of social inequity is potentially going to vote according to the logic of that zero sum game.
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9710
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 4:42 am
I suppose at the end of this discussion my worry is that as GenZ shows a tendency towards moving away from the “faith of their fathers” (generally speaking) and becoming more secular and non theistic in their leanings we may see a trend towards placing ‘faith’ in government and institutions as being their ‘savior’ of sorts.
I see the 🤡 🎪 is still going strong. Gee, I wonder why younger people don’t trust their church and look to involving government to protect themselves from the faith of others …
My bishop told me, an 8 year old, that since Jesus tells us to forgive people, that if I didn’t forgive the dude who molested me regularly for over 2 years, that I was committing an even worse sin than the molester, as to not forgive him would be directly going against the words of Christ.

I remember feeling pretty confused about this, as I was being told how nothing was my fault and that I was not in trouble etc, but that I would be a sinner if I couldn’t forgive the guy.

I shut down so hard and was so dissociated for years because the trauma of all that crap was never really addressed. The bishop who is supposed to be inspired by the spirit due to his calling/office, told me god would punish me if I didn’t forgive a pedophile.

I felt like I was still on the hook spiritually, and I felt like I couldn’t trust anyone with the truth, as being genuine with people just ended up getting me in trouble and feeling guilty.

It’s crazy looking back on it, but I just took it for granted as a normal part of life until I got older and was able to better understand what happened.

I’m not really angry about it anymore, just more baffled that people thought it was ok to teach a child something so glaringly wrong.
Is this civil society?

- Doc
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5296
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by MG 2.0 »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 4:42 am
Res Ipsa wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 1:29 am
I certainly hope they are trying to move the country away from the demonization of millions of citizens that you actively work at here.
Gen Zers are progressive and pro-government, most see the country’s growing racial and ethnic diversity as a good thing, and they’re less likely than older generations to see the United States as superior to other nations.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ns/616818/
I suppose at the end of this discussion my worry is that as GenZ shows a tendency towards moving away from the “faith of their fathers” (generally speaking) and becoming more secular and non theistic in their leanings we may see a trend towards placing ‘faith’ in government and institutions as being their ‘savior’ of sorts.

Conservatives and even many classical liberals would rather that we have limited government rather than a government, with all of its appendages (military industrial complex and other ‘complexes’) becoming ‘god’ in the power and authority it exercises in our lives and freedoms (free speech, etc.).

At the end of the day that is where my concerns lie.

I am NOT condemning GenZ. I am simply concerned in regards as to where their natural impulses of ‘faith’ in SOMETHING will lead them if they see government as the replacement for natural law which is seen as having its source from an all wise creator. In other words placing all faith and belief in the councils of men and fully trusting in that wisdom alone.

And to be clear I do believe in complete separation of church and state. Somewhere earlier in the thread someone made an accusation otherwise.

And to repeat, I am not in disfavor of any individual choosing secularism over theistic belief. I am concerned with any sort/kind of a groundswell that would replace religion or theistic belief with strict government influence and/or controls. Which COULD result in the elimination of free exercise of religion at some point in time. I see GenZ as showing potential to move that direction. That is, placing too much faith in government apparatus as being ‘savior’.

Maybe I’m wrong. If so, awesome (in my opinion).

I’ve enjoyed the discussion. I believe, however, there has been a significant degree of misunderstanding which has resulted in unwarranted criticism and innuendo. But that’s water under the bridge at this point. I’m happy to let things sit as they are. Some valid points have been made all the way around.

I appreciated those that exercised a degree of civility and understanding without jumping to hasty conclusions and the resulting accusations which can create disharmony and misunderstanding.

It is THAT civility that will be the hope of a future society where all people can coexist in peace.

Thanks all. Good conversation overall except for some blips here and there.

Until later.

Regards,
MG
Looking at the responses to this post I made yesterday.

The concerns which I’ve expressed have not been addressed. And it is those concerns that I believe we all ought to be worried about in the future. The Big Brother effect of government control and/or overreach. The question is whether or not recent generations of secular humanist liberals…with GenZ leading at the forefront…are taking us to places where in the final analyses we would rather not go.

If you read my reposted comments that I have provided here for the second time you will understand where the concerns of many conservatives lie. These concerns either don’t seem to be on the radar and/or are not addressed seriously by secular humanist liberals because they are supportive of greater government controls and intervention in the lives of citizens as long as it supports their leftest progressive agenda.

GenZ seems to be moving along towards moving that agenda along into the future. Theists, of course, would have concerns that many of you folks may not have simply because of opposing worldviews.

Anyway, I think this is where we kind of end up in a basic disagreement. What is important, as I’ve said, is that we get along and not fall into a trap of non acceptance of each other. THAT is the problem we’re facing as a nation/world now.

Jesus’s teachings of being peacemakers are apropos as some of these divides seemingly get wider.

The Atlantic article I linked to is a good article, by the way.

Regards,
MG
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9710
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Jesus wasn’t a peacemaker. The Gospels themselves record a number of instances where Jesus did, in fact, commit acts of violence and promoted violence:

- Whip in hand, causing a fracas, he attacked the merchants in the Temple area (Matthew 21:12, Mark 11:15-16, Luke 19:45, John 2:15).

- He destroyed a fig tree for not having fruit out of season (Matthew 21:18-21, Mark 11:13-14).

- He caused the death, by drowning, of a herd of swine by allowing demons to purposely enter their bodies (Matthew 8:32, Mark 5:13, Luke 8:33).

- He proudly stated his is a mission will cause discord, disturb the peace, and bring war to the world (Matthew 10:34-35, Luke 12:49-53).

- He declared: “But these enemies of mine who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here, and slay them in my presence.” (Luke 19:27)

- He cursed the Pharisees (Matthew 23),

- He threatened violent retribution on cities that rejected his message (Matthew 11:20-24, Luke 10:13-15)

- In the Gospels Jesus irrationally denounced the entire Jewish people for murders neither they nor their fathers committed (I think he cursed them, too).

Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

As usual, Mental Muppet doesn’t posses a basic understanding of Christianity, much less his own faith.

- Doc
dastardly stem
God
Posts: 2259
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2020 2:38 pm

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by dastardly stem »

Yep, DrCam. Jesus preached peace and war just as he preached love and hate. The mixed messaging makes sense from an ancient preacher who didn't now washing hands is a critical part of public health, I suppose. But if we treat him as God who is about solving problems...well then he's a terrible dude for leaving us with such confusion.

I'll be honest, I read MG's last post with the large portion he quoted of himself and I'm a bit like, "I can't tell what the f he's complaining about, exactly." Sounds about like Jesus to me. Maybe he's a better disciple than people give him credit for?
“Every one of us is, in the cosmic perspective, precious. If a human disagrees with you, let him live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you will not find another.”
― Carl Sagan, Cosmos
User avatar
Doctor Steuss
God
Posts: 2129
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by Doctor Steuss »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:41 pm
Jesus wasn’t a peacemaker. The Gospels themselves record a number of instances where Jesus did, in fact, commit acts of violence and promoted violence:

- Whip in hand, causing a fracas, he attacked the merchants in the Temple area (Matthew 21:12, Mark 11:15-16, Luke 19:45, John 2:15).
As an aside, I personally think the likely embellishment of this helps in illustrating the gospel writers' desire to show the extent to which Jesus' Kingdom of God movement was extremist, and against the status quo.

If this event actually happened, Jesus would have been seized immediately by the temple guards. You didn't mess about on temple grounds. It didn't matter who you were. A Roman soldier showing his backside in the direction of the temple once caused a riot that resulted in the death of tens of thousands.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5296
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by MG 2.0 »

dastardly stem wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:52 pm
Yep, DrCam. Jesus preached peace and war just as he preached love and hate. The mixed messaging makes sense from an ancient preacher who didn't now washing hands is a critical part of public health, I suppose. But if we treat him as God who is about solving problems...well then he's a terrible dude for leaving us with such confusion.

I'll be honest, I read MG's last post with the large portion he quoted of himself and I'm a bit like, "I can't tell what the f he's complaining about, exactly." Sounds about like Jesus to me. Maybe he's a better disciple than people give him credit for?
Not complaining as much as expressing sincere concern. Again:

And it is those concerns that I believe we all ought to be worried about in the future. The Big Brother effect of government control and/or overreach. The question is whether or not recent generations of secular humanist liberals…with GenZ leading at the forefront…are taking us to places where in the final analyses we would rather not go.

If you read my reposted comments that I have provided here for the second time you will understand where the concerns of many conservatives lie. These concerns either don’t seem to be on the radar and/or are not addressed seriously by secular humanist liberals because they are supportive of greater government controls and intervention in the lives of citizens as long as it supports their leftest progressive agenda.

GenZ seems to be moving along towards moving that agenda along into the future. Theists, of course, would have concerns that many of you folks may not have simply because of opposing worldviews.
Regards,
MG
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by Res Ipsa »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:22 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 4:42 am




I suppose at the end of this discussion my worry is that as GenZ shows a tendency towards moving away from the “faith of their fathers” (generally speaking) and becoming more secular and non theistic in their leanings we may see a trend towards placing ‘faith’ in government and institutions as being their ‘savior’ of sorts.

Conservatives and even many classical liberals would rather that we have limited government rather than a government, with all of its appendages (military industrial complex and other ‘complexes’) becoming ‘god’ in the power and authority it exercises in our lives and freedoms (free speech, etc.).

At the end of the day that is where my concerns lie.

I am NOT condemning GenZ. I am simply concerned in regards as to where their natural impulses of ‘faith’ in SOMETHING will lead them if they see government as the replacement for natural law which is seen as having its source from an all wise creator. In other words placing all faith and belief in the councils of men and fully trusting in that wisdom alone.

And to be clear I do believe in complete separation of church and state. Somewhere earlier in the thread someone made an accusation otherwise.

And to repeat, I am not in disfavor of any individual choosing secularism over theistic belief. I am concerned with any sort/kind of a groundswell that would replace religion or theistic belief with strict government influence and/or controls. Which COULD result in the elimination of free exercise of religion at some point in time. I see GenZ as showing potential to move that direction. That is, placing too much faith in government apparatus as being ‘savior’.

Maybe I’m wrong. If so, awesome (in my opinion).

I’ve enjoyed the discussion. I believe, however, there has been a significant degree of misunderstanding which has resulted in unwarranted criticism and innuendo. But that’s water under the bridge at this point. I’m happy to let things sit as they are. Some valid points have been made all the way around.

I appreciated those that exercised a degree of civility and understanding without jumping to hasty conclusions and the resulting accusations which can create disharmony and misunderstanding.

It is THAT civility that will be the hope of a future society where all people can coexist in peace.

Thanks all. Good conversation overall except for some blips here and there.

Until later.

Regards,
MG
Looking at the responses to this post I made yesterday.

The concerns which I’ve expressed have not been addressed. And it is those concerns that I believe we all ought to be worried about in the future. The Big Brother effect of government control and/or overreach. The question is whether or not recent generations of secular humanist liberals…with GenZ leading at the forefront…are taking us to places where in the final analyses we would rather not go.

If you read my reposted comments that I have provided here for the second time you will understand where the concerns of many conservatives lie. These concerns either don’t seem to be on the radar and/or are not addressed seriously by secular humanist liberals because they are supportive of greater government controls and intervention in the lives of citizens as long as it supports their leftest progressive agenda.

GenZ seems to be moving along towards moving that agenda along into the future. Theists, of course, would have concerns that many of you folks may not have simply because of opposing worldviews.

Anyway, I think this is where we kind of end up in a basic disagreement. What is important, as I’ve said, is that we get along and not fall into a trap of non acceptance of each other. THAT is the problem we’re facing as a nation/world now.

Jesus’s teachings of being peacemakers are apropos as some of these divides seemingly get wider.

The Atlantic article I linked to is a good article, by the way.

Regards,
MG
In other words, the conservative anti-government paranoia is losing in the marketplace of ideas. Too bad, so sad. The conservatism of Ronald Regan dismantled the greatest achievement of the American economic system: the creation of a strong middle class. Until 1980, the fruits of the engine of American prosperity were shared proportionately by rich and poor. That all changed starting in 1980, when the Republican Party began shifting the distribution of wealth and income more and more in favor of the rich. The U.S. continued to enjoy ever increasing real per capita income, but it all went to the wealthy. And on top of that, it set the middle and lower classes against each other to fight over the scraps in the hope that no one would notice where all the money went.

Conservatives have no answers for the problems and crises that face the newest generation of Americans. Among first-world countries, we pay the most for the worst health care simply because conservatives pee their pants at the mere thought of government involvement in health care, despite the evidence we see from other first-world countries. If you can't afford health care, the conservative's answer is, then die and be quick about it.

When we had a healthy middle class, the way middle class families tapped into wealth accumulation was home ownership. Now, ownership is foreclosed for the vast percentage of young people as the rich acquire portfolios of single family homes as investment vehicles, turning what would have been a new generation of home owners into a permanent renter class. What's the conservative answer? Something something something market something.

In the last couple of years, we've seen increases in real wages, which in part triggered a round of conservative inflation hysteria. What's the conservative answer? Repeal child labor protections. Back to the 1800's we go.

And climate? Reagan conservatives denied and lied for years about some pretty simple physics regarding what happens when you increase the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere far beyond anything in human experience. As a result, what was a problem we could have addressed incrementally for 40 years has grown into a full-blown crisis that the Gen Z and beyond are saddled with fixing. What's the conservative answer? Drill baby drill! Keep lining the pockets of fossil fuel companies until we've sucked the last drop out from under the earth. 7+ degrees F or bust.

Gen Z can read. They can spot the glaring hypocrisy between what conservatives say and what they've actually accomplished. They can trace the line from Regan-style conservatism directly to today's MAGA Christo-Authoritarian insanity. The party that pretended to want "judicial restraint" now celebrates one of the most activist court's in my lifetime. The party of individual freedom now uses the power of big government to force pregnant women to give birth. It denies health care to transgender folks. It returns us to the era of child labor. It gags teachers and professors so they won't say something that offends it. It makes sure children go hungry. It makes sure that people who can't afford housing have to live in their cars or on the street. It enabled and supported the election of an unqualified authoritarian demagogue to the highest office in the country. It actively works toward making it more difficult for black and brown folks to vote rather than do something to attract them as voters.

Yes. I understand why you and other conservatives are worried. The conservatives of the early '80s sold their souls to so-called "movement conservatives" to win elections. And where that ended up was angry mobs of so-called Christians acting like thugs over drag queens and library books that mention slavery or show LGBT+ folks in any kind of positive light. Meanwhile, the real problems facing Gen Z and the upcoming generations are made worse and worse. All because you're paranoid about Stalin.

The only conservative program to address major societal problems for decades has been to cut taxes, obstruct and sabotage government at every turn, and demonize "the left." And guess what? People are getting a good look at what that translates to on the ground, and they're not liking it. And they're looking at what happens when religious extremists are given governmental power, and they're not liking that much either.

Of course you're afraid. You're losing in the marketplace of ideas -- both politically and theologically. When the political party with which most conservatives identify has as its political platform: "Donald Trump," it has shown itself to be intellectually bankrupt when it comes to making the lives of its citizens better. When its legacy is underfunded government, deteriorating infrastructure, enormous deficits created by cutting taxes ad infinitem, a shocking rate of incarceration, and a rate of violence and murder that should be shocking to any American, what would be the appeal to new voters?

All you have is fear and division. if the country turns away from religion and conservatism, it's your own damn fault.
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
honorentheos
God
Posts: 4298
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:15 am

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by honorentheos »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:22 pm
The concerns which I’ve expressed have not been addressed. And it is those concerns that I believe we all ought to be worried about in the future. The Big Brother effect of government control and/or overreach. The question is whether or not recent generations of secular humanist liberals…with GenZ leading at the forefront…are taking us to places where in the final analyses we would rather not go.

If you read my reposted comments that I have provided here for the second time you will understand where the concerns of many conservatives lie. These concerns either don’t seem to be on the radar and/or are not addressed seriously by secular humanist liberals because they are supportive of greater government controls and intervention in the lives of citizens as long as it supports their leftest progressive agenda.

GenZ seems to be moving along towards moving that agenda along into the future. Theists, of course, would have concerns that many of you folks may not have simply because of opposing worldviews.

Anyway, I think this is where we kind of end up in a basic disagreement. What is important, as I’ve said, is that we get along and not fall into a trap of non acceptance of each other. THAT is the problem we’re facing as a nation/world now.

Jesus’s teachings of being peacemakers are apropos as some of these divides seemingly get wider.

The Atlantic article I linked to is a good article, by the way.

Regards,
MG
MG, you keep getting your political chocolate mixed in your religious peanut butter. You tell the board we should be concerned about threats to civil society in the OP. Then it turned out you were really concerned about preserving religion. You see government in conflict with religion apparently yet offer no actual discussion points to explain why an increased government role in ??? should concern everyone unless they happen to have a "progressive leftest (sic) agenda".

You claimed I wasn't reading your posts with comprehension when I describe them as thoughtless rightwing propoganda points. Then you post almost nothing but rightwing propoganda.

Try, just try, to make a coherent argument that pulls together your claim everyone should be concerned about the direction society is going and confirms you are in favor of the division between church and state.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5296
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Secular folks should worry.

Post by MG 2.0 »

honorentheos wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:09 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:22 pm
The concerns which I’ve expressed have not been addressed. And it is those concerns that I believe we all ought to be worried about in the future. The Big Brother effect of government control and/or overreach. The question is whether or not recent generations of secular humanist liberals…with GenZ leading at the forefront…are taking us to places where in the final analyses we would rather not go.

If you read my reposted comments that I have provided here for the second time you will understand where the concerns of many conservatives lie. These concerns either don’t seem to be on the radar and/or are not addressed seriously by secular humanist liberals because they are supportive of greater government controls and intervention in the lives of citizens as long as it supports their leftest progressive agenda.

GenZ seems to be moving along towards moving that agenda along into the future. Theists, of course, would have concerns that many of you folks may not have simply because of opposing worldviews.

Anyway, I think this is where we kind of end up in a basic disagreement. What is important, as I’ve said, is that we get along and not fall into a trap of non acceptance of each other. THAT is the problem we’re facing as a nation/world now.

Jesus’s teachings of being peacemakers are apropos as some of these divides seemingly get wider.

The Atlantic article I linked to is a good article, by the way.

Regards,
MG
MG, you keep getting your political chocolate mixed in your religious peanut butter. You tell the board we should be concerned about threats to civil society in the OP. Then it turned out you were really concerned about preserving religion. You see government in conflict with religion apparently yet offer no actual discussion points to explain why an increased government role in ??? should concern everyone unless they happen to have a "progressive leftest (sic) agenda".

You claimed I wasn't reading your posts with comprehension when I describe them as thoughtless rightwing propoganda points. Then you post almost nothing but rightwing propoganda.

Try, just try, to make a coherent argument that pulls together your claim everyone should be concerned about the direction society is going and confirms you are in favor of the division between church and state.
I appreciate your response. At this point I think I’ve expressed my thoughts/sentiments as concisely and clearly as I am able to do so. As with so many things the truth usually lies somewhere in between extremes. The two extremes in this instance are those who speak from a secularist non theistic worldview and those that speak from a theistic view of the world and man’s place in it.

At the end of the day it becomes a compromise between folks that see the world and man’s place in it as a result of only man’s genius or whether one is responsible to God also in respect to natural law.

Personally I am more comfortable in the imprint on our coinage:

In God We Trust

What that compromise will look like going into the future is anyone’s guess at this point. But again, let it be said, there are valid concerns that many reasonable people have as we see current trends in ethical/moral behavior and what that may look like/mean in the future.

As Res Ipsa said, generations previous to GenZ have not always made perfect decisions. He referred to Ronald Reagan. Reaganomics was a mixed bag.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaganomics

Keynesian economics has its faults. No man made economic system is perfect. But movements towards socialism or Marxist ideologies are a concern. The question is what will be the outcome as we continue to move down the path we’re on. And what will be the result if the percentage of ‘nones’ continues to increase.

It’s a cause for concern.

And you don’t have to be a supporter of Donald Trump to look at the future with a healthy sense of foreboding. Without being doom and gloom. We need to live our lives with optimism and courage as we look forward to the future with the hope that future generations will make good choices and that their choices will result in liberty and justice for all and that religious liberty still be enshrined as a basic right as outlined in the First Amendment to the Constitution.

And that the Constitution will still be the governing document of our land along with the Bill of Rights.

I’m sure that folks here are strictly in favor of that. Right?

Regards,
MG
Post Reply