I think I am being too polite for you to grasp what I am trying to convey.
It is this: You are a person with little or no understanding of science, and what you have to say on the topic of this thread is devoid of interest.
You are boring.
Goodbye.
I think I am being too polite for you to grasp what I am trying to convey.
Which discussion boards if any have you found worth your time and energy? I'm really curious if anyone, anywhere finds your gravity ideas the least bit interesting.Valo wrote:Not worthy of my time or energy.
That's what you perceive?
Try to keep your bones from rattling as you cower away!
I don't want to beat up children.Gadianton wrote: ↑Tue Jun 18, 2024 12:38 amWhich discussion boards if any have you found worth your time and energy? I'm really curious if anyone, anywhere finds your gravity ideas the least bit interesting.Valo wrote:Not worthy of my time or energy.
Please post links to any discussions you've had anywhere on the internet where someone has responded positively to your theories on gravity.
Perhaps a unique address,1938, and ferns as per posts about Fernelias are significant and confirm stuff said about #19 and the Father.
Doubtful. If you think they do, then it's on you to explain why and how.High Spy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:01 pmPerhaps a unique address,1938, and ferns as per posts about Fernelias are significant and confirm stuff said about #19 and the Father.
The talk you linked to is about a company that helps women with the menopause? Or does it just show what's on today? Are you giving a presentation?High Spy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:01 pmPerhaps a unique address,1938, and ferns as per posts about Fernelias are significant and confirm stuff said about #19 and the Father.
Every meeting features different presenters. After my first A head of school was interested in hosting a derby in her summer school, but that timeline wasn’t doable. Rocket Man may do a demo depending on ceiling height and stuff. Today ChatGPT tried to help fill up a questionnaire from my patent agent. Overall a stellar performer, except:IWMP wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 11:22 amThe talk you linked to is about a company that helps women with the menopause? Or does it just show what's on today? Are you giving a presentation?High Spy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:01 pm
Perhaps a unique address,1938, and ferns as per posts about Fernelias are significant and confirm stuff said about #19 and the Father.
Technically they aren’t rockets, so that’s one place ChatGPT could improve.Based on the information provided in the text, a functional name for the invention could be "Gravity-Powered Rocket Launching System." This name captures the core functionality and purpose of the invention.
No worries, said agent revised my “Launch Apparatus for Air Derbies” to “Launch Apparatus for Ariel Objects”.Thank you for pointing that out. Given that the projectiles in the invention are not technically rockets but are referred to as "Gravity Powered Rocket Shaped Projectiles (GPRSPs)," a more accurate functional name for the invention could be "Gravity-Powered Rocket-Shaped Projectile Launching System." This name reflects the core functionality and purpose of the invention while accurately describing the nature of the projectiles being launched.