While I wait for you to support you assertion with video evidence of the behavior in question, I'll just leave this nice advert for ketchup for everyone to gaze upon. See how happy the homemaker is now? She obviously got the right brand!
Holy crap, Jersey Girl. You made that Kathy Griffin picture funny.
Kudos to you.
I live to serve!
LIGHT HAS A NAME
We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF
It wasn't a one-off. Have you forgotten that he's done this multiple times to multiple women and girls?
So, what is your point? What is your goal? Are you really saying that sniffing hair is just as bad as rape?
Of course sniffing hair isn't as bad as rape. I never conflated the two issues; you did.
I am trying to understand why you are so stuck on this odd, minor point.
Because Veritas said Joe Biden is a good man. My point is that invading women's and girls' personal spaces, putting hands on them, and sniffing their hair is just one behavior among others that disqualify Joe Biden from being considered a "good man." (REMINDER: This observation is hermetically sealed away from Donald Trump or any of his own attributes. A person doesn't magically become "good" just because we can identify someone who's worse, so let's not conflate the two.)
Paul von Hindenburg was old and he too may have sniffed hair. That creates plenty of justification and forgiveness for his successor's slight transgressions.
Of course sniffing hair isn't as bad as rape. I never conflated the two issues; you did.
I was asking for a comparison. It was a question. I was not “conflating the two issues.”
Because Veritas said Joe Biden is a good man. My point is that invading women's and girls' personal spaces, putting hands on them, and sniffing their hair is just one behavior among others that disqualify Joe Biden from being considered a "good man." (REMINDER: This observation is hermetically sealed away from Donald Trump or any of his own attributes. A person doesn't magically become "good" just because we can identify someone who's worse, so let's not conflate the two.)
I certainly don’t think it makes him a bad man. It makes him an old man whose ideas of human interaction are outdated.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Paul von Hindenburg was old and he too may have sniffed hair. That creates plenty of justification and forgiveness for his successor's slight transgressions.
Hindenburg’s successor did far, far worse things than sniff hair. Therefore, I’m sure you’re perfectly fine with me standing behind your wife, putting my hands on her shoulders, and sniffing her hair.
Hindenburg’s successor did far, far worse things than sniff hair. Therefore, I’m sure you’re perfectly fine with me standing behind your wife, putting my hands on her shoulders, and sniffing her hair.
Hypothetically speaking . . .
What do you think should be done in response to an elderly man doing that to your wife? You gonna punch him?
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Hindenburg’s successor did far, far worse things than sniff hair. Therefore, I’m sure you’re perfectly fine with me standing behind your wife, putting my hands on her shoulders, and sniffing her hair.
Hypothetically speaking . . .
What do you think should be done in response to an elderly man doing that to your wife? You gonna punch him?
No. As I already made perfectly clear, what I will do in response is refrain from voting for him if he later secures the presidential nomination of my favorite political party.
Now, is this good enough, or shall I make it perfectly clear a third time?
No. As I already made perfectly clear, what I will do in response is refrain from voting for him if he later secures the presidential nomination of my favorite political party.
Now, is this good enough, or shall I make it perfectly clear a third time?
Yeah, well, your priorities are screwy.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Trump is a lawless man and a threat to our system of government. His minions plan to distort our government to invest near-autocratic powers in him. He may use these powers to please ethic nationalists and theocrats at the expense of the freedom and security of everyone.
But Biden sniffs hair so . . .
Bye, bye, American Republic!
The hair thing? That’s just too much for me.
[/sarcasm]
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Trump is a lawless man and a threat to our system of government. His minions plan to distort our government to invest near-autocratic powers in him. He may use these powers to please ethic nationalists and theocrats at the expense of the freedom and security of everyone.
On that we can agree.
But Biden sniffs hair so . . .
Bye, bye, American Republic!
The hair thing? That’s just too much for me.
No, not “Bye bye American Republic.” “Vote for a non-corrupt, non-‘threaten to withhold military aid unless they fire the attorney who’s investigating for corruption the company on whose board my son sits’ candidate.”
