I did see it but I didn’t find it interesting enough to respond to knowing that it already had already been addressed by minds much greater than mine. I let it pass because my time is limited and I pick and choose what to respond to. For those that aren’t aware of the response to Gadianton’s link go here:I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:25 amI note that MG 2.0 hasn’t responded to your points Gadianton. Perhaps he missed your post.Gadianton wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 12:52 amBecause MG finally made good and watched some of his video and posted his thoughts, I watched the first 10 minutes.
Out of the gate Jacob comes swinging with "NHM", which was also Hamblin's go-to discovery. The Bible has a book called Nahum and given the sheer number of Bible names and Bible-riffed names in the Book of Mormon, its pretty obvious it is Bible fan fic. And Jacob massively oversells it, as if anyone but Mormon apologists have agreed that NHM would have or has ever meant Nahom. More on Jacob's hilarious overselling at the end of this post.
Phillip Jenkins has an epic takedown of NHM here:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/anxiousbe ... m-follies/
While I certainly can't compete with Jenkins, I apparently did my own study of Nahom back when I was thinking about Book of Mormon names.
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=151744
Hamblin was right about one thing. He knew that he had to account for the chance appearance of the three letters appearing together, and so he did a bogus calculation showing it to be some ridiculous number and ceded the point later (another apologist corrected him). But he was right to take that into account. My interest in how names appear is similar to Hamblin's thoughts about what kind of names we'd expect to find. (not detailed odds)
Now back to Jacob's overselling. Jenkins hits it out of the park here:
That quotation is about verbatim Jacob's sales pitch to his Catholic friends! LOL!
https://journal.interpreterfoundation.o ... perplexity
One thing I do find interesting other than Gadianton’s failure to refer to the link in the Interpreter is that his source doesn’t mention anything about the Book of Mormon narrative then moving on from Nahom directly East and ending up at Bountiful. What a lucky guess Joseph made to end up at almost an ideal location to launch a boat from and the Lehites having the means to survive in an otherwise harsh environment while building the boat.

A series of coincidences pointed out in the Interpreter article can make one question whether all of them add up to ‘Joseph did it’ or if we are reading the actual account of a family leaving Jerusalem and preparing to travel to a promised land.
Regards,
MG