Gadianton wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2024 12:19 am
just a note on doubting, and "saving a testimony."
What is a testimony? It's the knowledge that the Church is true. Under this definition, nobody has a testimony because nobody "knows the church is true". But let's admit it's hypothetically possible for someone to "know the church is true." There is a difference between knowing the Church is true, and feelings and experiences and beliefs that one has had that lead one to believe that they know the Church is true. And so practically, a testimony is the belief that one knows the Church is true.
There is no point in "saving a testimony." If I believe my house is built to withstand a tornado, and I believe that I know that it will survive based on my experiences, knowledge, and feelings, but then somebody makes some good points I'd never thought of, there is no sanctity in rescuing my beliefs just for the sake of rescuing them.
Mormons certainly don't have a problem if an Evangelical loses their "testimony" of their creeds and joins the Mormon Church. A testimony isn't a privileged thing thing that justifies all kinds of gymnastics to "save". That's special pleading just for a Mormon's situation, and otherwise Mormons wouldn't care one bit about about loss of faith of non-Mormons, if that loss of faith meant acquiring beliefs in Mormonism.
The Church doesn’t provide a definitive explanation of what a “testimony” is or isn’t. There’s lots of talk about it, but nothing clear. It’s knowing, or believing, or a conviction about something etc. A testimony is, it seems, something ambiguous. On that basis, a testimony is worthless outside of the individual who holds it.
How can my conviction of the Church be strengthened simply by hearing other people talk about their conviction, founded on their perspectives about things? That’s the process by which MLM’s and Affinity Frauds function - feel good about this product/scheme because I feel good about it. Testimony Meeting is the same as an MLM party. An echo chamber.
If you really wanted to determine the accuracy of Church claims, you’d want to investigate all the credible resources available - because it’s a very costly investment. You wouldn’t just investigate Bernie Madoff’s latest investment scheme by just reading the sources Bernie approves, and listening to people who have already invested. Your scope of fact checking would be much wider than that. As it should be when making big, life-changing decisions, especially ones where it’s going to cost you significant amounts of money.
Make no mistake, Church membership is the biggest financial investment you’ll ever make. And yet Church leaders and members want you to do ZERO proper due diligence on it. You should wonder why that is…