Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Please demonstrate how Marcus’s statement is false.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Please demonstrate how Marcus’s statement is false.
After the response(s) I’ve given upthread I think it might be helpful for Marcus to do a rewrite of the statement in which she thinks I’ve contradicted myself.
As it is, I think I’ve already responded to any concerns and there may be nothing else to add.
Please demonstrate how Marcus’s statement is false.
After the response(s) I’ve given upthread I think it might be helpful for Marcus to do a rewrite of the statement in which she thinks I’ve contradicted myself.
You did contradict yourself. That’s been made very obvious by several of Marcus’s posts.
As it is, I think I’ve already responded to any concerns and there may be nothing else to add.
Regardless of what you think, you haven’t.
I’m going to stop conversing with you now because I suspect, strongly, that you have one of the more serious personality disorders. I think you’re unable to see anything different to how you want to see it. I don’t think conversing with you is helpful to anyone.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.