CWK #31: Just about the sex? Mormon polygamy.

[Kishkumen]

LOL...So do you believe that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God? You just wrote, "My persona is not at all cryptic to those who have paid attention." that is a admission of sorts to being cryptic...my questions are rather easy and simple...."do you believe that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God?" Why can't you answer the question, it is really not that hard.

So I promise you I am paying attention, do you believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God?

No, you are not paying attention.

[Markk]

LOL...So do you believe that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God? You just wrote, "My persona is not at all cryptic to those who have paid attention." that is a admission of sorts to being cryptic...my questions are rather easy and simple...."do you believe that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God?" Why can't you answer the question, it is really not that hard.

So I promise you I am paying attention, do you believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God?

No, you are not paying attention.

LOL, come on Kish....why on earth can't you be open, transparent and honest. You get butt hurt when I compare you to a mopologist, and rant about it on a special podcast But, yet you retort as they do; it is like pulling teeth to get a open and honest answer from you. Your answer to my simple question, "do you believe Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God" is "I am not paying attention????" LOL It is like when the mopologist when they retort "what would a steel sword look like?" after asking them about the Book of Mormon reading that there were steel swords.

Like your podcasts, your conversations' here are scattered and cryptic, combined with name calling and I will venture out inventing a new word....your "butt hurtness."

And for the record I believe Joseph was a charlatan, conman, false prophet, lousy father and horrible husband, fornicator, adulterer, thief, back stabber, and maybe above all these things to his friends and associates, El Sancho.

[Rivendale]

Interesting you would ask if I knew Quinn was a believer. What gaping hole in your recollection of your threads insinuates it is designated to antagonists?

I am trying to figure out what your list has to do with the present discussion, as even the list itself is a grab-bag of different types.

You seem to not understand obviously. Accusing us of bias is ok as long as you see your own also. Your thrive comment is a clue. Let that sink in a bit.

[Kishkumen]

LOL, come on Kish....why on earth can't you be open, transparent and honest. You get butt hurt when I compare you to a mopologist, and rant about it on a special podcast But, yet you retort as they do; it is like pulling teeth to get a open and honest answer from you. Your answer to my simple question, "do you believe Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God" is "I am not paying attention????" LOL It is like when the mopologist when they retort "what would a steel sword look like?" after asking them about the Book of Mormon reading that there were steel swords.

Like your podcasts, your conversations' here are scattered and cryptic, combined with name calling and I will venture out inventing a new word....your "butt hurtness."

And for the record I believe Joseph was a charlatan, conman, false prophet, lousy father and horrible husband, fornicator, adulterer, thief, back stabber, and maybe above all these things to his friends and associates, El Sancho.

Only profligate fools believe they owe the world their innermost thoughts. I am not a missionary, and I am not “baring my testimony.” The videos are casual chats. If you are too slow to follow them, or they don’t appeal to you, then don’t watch them. Go read some Jack Chick tracts to reinforce your views, if you can only handle fare that seeks to reinforce one-sided, simplistic takes on the topic.

Whatever Smith was doesn’t excuse you behaving like a bigoted ass right here and now.

[Kishkumen]

You seem to not understand obviously. Accusing us of bias is ok as long as you see your own also. Your thrive comment is a clue. Let that sink in a bit.

I’ve acknowledged my bias the whole way through, Rivendale. Sorry you missed that. I am not feeling chastened here. Accuse me of something I am guilty of and have not acknowledged. Bias is baked into every discussion.

There. I said it yet again. Good enough for you?

[Markk]

LOL, come on Kish....why on earth can't you be open, transparent and honest. You get butt hurt when I compare you to a mopologist, and rant about it on a special podcast But, yet you retort as they do; it is like pulling teeth to get a open and honest answer from you. Your answer to my simple question, "do you believe Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God" is "I am not paying attention????" LOL It is like when the mopologist when they retort "what would a steel sword look like?" after asking them about the Book of Mormon reading that there were steel swords.

Like your podcasts, your conversations' here are scattered and cryptic, combined with name calling and I will venture out inventing a new word....your "butt hurtness."

And for the record I believe Joseph was a charlatan, conman, false prophet, lousy father and horrible husband, fornicator, adulterer, thief, back stabber, and maybe above all these things to his friends and associates, El Sancho.

Only profligate fools believe they owe the world their innermost thoughts. I am not a missionary, and I am not “baring my testimony.” The videos are casual chats. If you are too slow to follow them, or they don’t appeal to you, then don’t watch them. Go read some Jack Chick tracts to reinforce your views, if you can only handle fare that seeks to reinforce one-sided, simplistic takes on the topic.

Whatever Smith was doesn’t excuse you behaving like a bigoted ass right here and now.

Again more name calling. How am i a bigot? You want to criticize and call out others and then refuse to converse with those you call names and critisize...it shows a lot Kish.

LOL I just googled Jack Chick, and it just shows you bigotry by associating me with this guy. But is does prove my point about your ingrained bigotry by associating all Christian as some sort of bad person, it would be similar I think, I need to read more about Chick, that all atheists are like Stalin, all Mormons are like Joseph Smith, or all Democrats are members of the KKK, or all Republicans are associated with those idiots from Colorado. Again you prove my assertion of your heart.

[Kishkumen]

Again more name calling. How am i a bigot?

I was commenting on the behavior I was observing. I don’t know you.

You want to criticize and call out others and then refuse to converse with those you call names and critisize...it shows a lot Kish.

I criticize anti-Mormon ministries, yes. I am a little surprised that you took it so hard. It is not like I personally dislike the people involved. But clearly I touched a nerve.

LOL I just googled Jack Chick, and it just shows you bigotry by associating me with this guy. But is does prove my point about your ingrained bigotry by associating all Christian as some sort of bad person, it would be similar I think, I need to read more about Chick, that all atheists are like Stalin, all Mormons are like Joseph Smith, or all Democrats are members of the KKK, or all Republicans are associated with those idiots from Colorado. Again you prove my assertion of your heart.

Well, don’t assert my heart too much. I only have one.

I don’t associate all Christians with anti-Mormon ministries. That is a misrepresentation of my view. You seem to identify with anti-Mormonism, hence your touchiness about the topic, so it seemed like you might enjoy some light anti-Mormon reading.

[Dr. Shades]

Do you not see a stark difference between the two sets of accounts?

Do you not see that, like the witnesses, Clayton was under the influence of a powerful leader? Do you not see that he was highly motivated by his own skin in the game to present things in a particular light?

It sounds like you don't want Clayton's myth to thrive. If not, why is this the sole exception within all of Mormonism?

[Kishkumen]

It sounds like you don't want Clayton's myth to thrive. If not, why is this the sole exception within all of Mormonism?

Nice shot at being clever. I am in a discussion about the history of polygamy, and how to do history. I think the chances are that Clayton's story is accurate.

[Dr. Shades]

I think the chances are that Clayton's story is accurate.

Then why did you chuckle at it?