Kishkumen wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:48 pmNo redeeming value? I don't go in for stark statements like that. Abraham reasoning on the principles of astronomy? Seems like it is just an illustration of what Joseph Smith thought Abraham did. The stuff about the slave is crap, sure.Shulem wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 6:34 pmYes, it's possible to discern what's bad and find good things in sacred text and traditions. But text such as that of the Explanations for Facsimile No. 3, published in Mormon canon for 144 years, have no redeeming value. It's high time the Church dump the crap and move on just as they did the priesthood ban in 1978. Surely you agree.

Goddamn you, Kish. There is no "just" about it. What the hell is wrong with you?
The Explanations of Facsimile No. 3 have no redeeming value. They are reprehensible and slanderous, a solid mockery, and belittles the religious faith of a dead man who took his sacred record to his grave. For shame! The vignette is a holy document owned by Hor and was placed with his mummy in a tomb. It is sacred Egyptian text that has everything to do with Egyptian religion and Egyptian gods. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Jehovah, Abraham, or Israel for that matter.
How would you like it if someone went to the cemetery and dug up your dead grandfather and took personal writings he deemed sacred and reinterpreted them to promote a new cult religion? Let's dig up your grandfather and mishandle his dried bones about some attic in Kirtland for a freak side show and then take his sacred writings and pervert them -- or show a photo in his casket to represents a murderer such as Jack the Ripper. Let that be what your grandfather represents! And you, Kish, are the grandson of a killer!
How do you like that?
I demand the Church apologize for the evil practices of continuing to publish the Facsimile No. 3.