I don't know what your point was. You seemed to be saying that Doctor Scratch's Top Ten happenings list was an example of male unrighteousness dominion. It's not the list that has the problem you seem to be trying to identify, it's Mopologetics. In which case, why don't you take that fight up with Interpreter, Scripture Central, Fair etc?
You could run my post through ChatGPT for a bullet point list of my main points and which of my points your question speaks to if that would help. My guess is that she wound be great at that task.
My guess is you don’t know what your points really are.
You pose a pertinent and important question. If at all possible, it would be valuable for you to be able to understand the implications of your question. I find that comprehending the implications of questions is often the most important reason to ask them.
So go take your case up with Interpreter or Scripture Central or Fair. I mean, if you’re really interested in the lack of women in mopologetics that’s exactly what you’d do.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
You could run my post through ChatGPT for a bullet point list of my main points and which of my points your question speaks to if that would help. My guess is that she wound be great at that task.
My guess is you don’t know what your points really are.
You pose a pertinent and important question. If at all possible, it would be valuable for you to be able to understand the implications of your question. I find that comprehending the implications of questions is often the most important reason to ask them.
So go take your case up with Interpreter or Scripture Central or Fair. I mean, if you’re really interested in the lack of women in mopologetics that’s exactly what you’d do.
You’re right. You don’t comprehend.
And it’s not my job to help you.
Login to read my old public record, now forced into the private Telestial Room.
I don't know what your point was. You seemed to be saying that Doctor Scratch's Top Ten happenings list was an example of male unrighteousness dominion. It's not the list that has the problem you seem to be trying to identify, it's Mopologetics. In which case, why don't you take that fight up with Interpreter, Scripture Central, Fair etc?
I don't think she's allowed in those other spaces. But, this board accommodates her in real life attacks.
For example, she is allowed to prevent others here from posting her real name, but she is allowed to repeatedly accuse others, including members here, BY NAME, of in-real-life illegal activities. She does not provide evidence, she just makes accusations.
Watching Midsommar. Some weird, well, you know what.
Edited to add, hubby says I can no longer suggest movies.
"Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy” Jude 1:24
“the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin.” 1 John 1:7 ESV
My guess is you don’t know what your points really are.
So go take your case up with Interpreter or Scripture Central or Fair. I mean, if you’re really interested in the lack of women in mopologetics that’s exactly what you’d do.
You’re right. You don’t comprehend.
And it’s not my job to help you.
Of course it’s your responsibility to make sure others understand what you’re saying and why you’re saying it.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
I don't know what your point was. You seemed to be saying that Doctor Scratch's Top Ten happenings list was an example of male unrighteousness dominion. It's not the list that has the problem you seem to be trying to identify, it's Mopologetics. In which case, why don't you take that fight up with Interpreter, Scripture Central, Fair etc?
I don't think she's allowed in those other spaces. But, this board accommodates her in real life attacks.
For example, she is allowed to prevent others here from posting her real name, but she is allowed to repeatedly accuse others, including members here, BY NAME, of in-real-life illegal activities. She does not provide evidence, she just makes accusations.
Shades isn’t the most equanimous of administrators at times.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Watching Midsommar. Some weird, well, you know what.
Edited to add, hubby says I can no longer suggest movies.
LOL! Sorry, msnobody!
Up until last night, Big Fish, I think it was, was the strangest movie we had watched. I bet he doesn’t complain about it being a slow TV night again.
See, the things I do to understand the things posted here.
"Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy” Jude 1:24
“the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin.” 1 John 1:7 ESV
You really went the extra mile this time, msnobody! I will try to remember not to recommend folk horror to you.
Don't listen to him msnobody. Do not rest until you've seen every movie credited in the documentary Woodlands Dark and Days Bewitched: A History of Folk Horror.
