LOL cakes you have digressed for sure since 2019, but you have improved, a little, in not responding to the contexts of what folks write. One more time;
"I stopped posting here about politics, guessing, except for a few drive bys', for two or three years or more, so you tell me, how does that translate into half a decade?"
The crypto/meme coin landscape is still pretty new territory, speaking from a legislative and legal standpoint. Essentially, the $Trump and $MELANIA ‘coins’ aren’t backed by anything. Trump ‘owns’ a large amount of meme coin under either name that has been ‘created’, then traded speculatively. Oddly, Trump realized a $14B gain in the value of $Trump alone over a few days, based on nothing in particular. You might ask yourself how $14 billion flows into an imaginary currency and then is passed to the owner of the imaginary currency, or just where that value is sourcing from. I don’t expect that you or any Trump supporter will, though.
Is Crypto illegal? I don't know much about crypto currency, I need to do my homework for sure, and I will hopefully do so. But I am pretty sure it is not imaginary. I did read that Trump may create a national crypto/bitcoin where impounded/ceased crypto is put into this national reserve. I suppose it is no more imaginary than just printing money wildly, or stock trading on futures. You can have tax benefits in regard to retirement with crypto and it is recognized by our government....so I think maybe we both need to do a little more homework on this.
Serious question for you: if Trump did do something on this day that is largely regarded as illegal, who would hold him accountable for it? There is no person or agency that would address it given that he has installed loyalists at all of the traditional guardrail points. You might ask why he felt the need to have done that, and what the ramifications are for our nation and the rule of law/democracy, but I don’t expect that you or any Trump supporter will, though.
What did he do illegal? When you say "regarded" as legal I have to ask is it or is it not illegal? If it was illegal then he needs to be held accountable.If subjective, what is it?
Yes he is putting folks in around him this time around, like most all the presidents before him did, are you saying Biden was not protected? Trump did a poor job of that the first time around, I think he learned a lesson.
The reason he did it cakes is that the last time around the left went after him big time with lies and a media that was in their pocket. The 50 some intelligence folks signing the laptop lie as one example. Another, Facebook founder MZ stated the Biden folks would scream at Facebook if they did not remove content (is that illegal election interference?) ....I can go on and on.....so asking why Trump is being selective with folks joining his administration is rather obvious to anyone paying attention.
Given how much talk has come out of the Trump camp - including by Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, who are both in positions to initiate as many investigations as they want without a need to justify any of them - I’d say that it was a smart move by Biden.
If they are guilty of something I guess it is a smart move. How will we know if they are not investigated?
I did not see where you answered my question....
"But anyway Biden did have his chance, it was 4 years of ___________, you can fill in the blank." Just wondering.