I’m guessing you’re more of a Laurel & Hardy kind of guy. (And they are very very funny).Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 12:39 pmOh. But Nelson has suggested no such thing, hence my (continued) confusion.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Feb 08, 2025 11:10 amYes. It’s topical (spire height) and satirical. It made me smile. It’s clever because as ridiculous as it sounds, if Nelson suggested that Spire Height was significant in heralding the second coming, most Mormons would believe it.
Backyard Professor on Mormonism Live Tomorrow Night
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Backyard Professor on Mormonism Live Tomorrow Night
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
Dr Exiled
- God
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Re: Backyard Professor on Mormonism Live Tomorrow Night
Time to tap into your inner silliness and combine it with some irony, Dr. Shades, and you'll see Mr. Penguin's humor.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.