MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 4:22 pm
This thread has drawn some of you out a bit more so that your true colors can be seen/observed. Sometimes it's difficult to have a conversation and have that conversation result in transparency. I think we've seen that in this thread.
I've had some of my own suspicions confirmed. Nothing I didn't already suspect, but still...some more lines were colored in. What wasn't said and/or responded to tells me as much, if not more, than that which was responded to.
Some more T's crossed and I's dotted.
Thanks for the participation.
Be well.
Regards,
MG
This is pretty funny, from an analytical standpoint. Mentalgymnast has told us his starting assumptions about people here, and after his trolling, he tells us he has learned two things:
1. The assumptions he started with have been confirmed for him,
based on what people posted.
Also,
2. The same assumptions he started with in part 1 have also been confirmed for him,
based on what people did NOT post.
He confirms his bias in what he sees, but he also confirms the SAME bias in what he doesn't see. Both.
You know, it's just not true that there is a lack of creativity with LDS-based Trolls. That is, hands down, the most creative way that I have ever seen to guarantee he will be using confirmation bias in his analyses.
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics, yes. And then there is mg's LDS version: the
gone-to-hell-and-back-just-make-crap-up-until-you-get-the-lie-you're-pushing nonstats.
Mentalgymnast's grade: F.