Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?
Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.
I don't think you've given a satisfactory answer as of yet.
Maybe it will come...
Regards,
MG
You are misdirecting and not answering the question that I've repeatedly asked you.
Marcus, you are doing the contextual hop scotch thingy again.
Not to mention the ellipses tango.
My question that I've repeatedly asked you only requires that you be vulnerable enough to state your personal beliefs in regards to the meaning of life and what you think happens after death.
Lurkers are always wondering what folks here actually believe. I've been rather clear.
Marcus, you are doing the contextual hop scotch thingy again.
Not to mention the ellipses tango.
My question that I've repeatedly asked you only requires that you be vulnerable enough to state your personal beliefs in regards to the meaning of life and what you think happens after death.
Lurkers are always wondering what folks here actually believe. I've been rather clear.
How about you?
Regards,
MG
Lol nice try, troll. You asked that sexist question here
mentalgymnast, trolling with sexism wrote:
...Freeranger should know the contextual framework/position from which you are speaking. He seems to be supportive of the LDS framework in which a man is encouraged to be a man. A leader. An example of goodness and righteousness.
Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?...
Trying to change the context after it has already been pointed out is just lazy trolling.
Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?
Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.
I don't think you've given a satisfactory answer as of yet.
Maybe it will come...
Regards,
MG
Personally, my North Star that gives my life meaning is a treasure digging 19th century con man. Who cheated on his wife with their teenage nanny, threatened his wife with eternal destruction if she didn’t let him marry 30+ more women, destroyed a printing press, declared himself next to Jesus, and couldn’t remember if he saw 1 or 2 people when he saw God. Also he was a world class translator, but only when using that same treasure digging stone in a hat. He also ran a couple failed bank schemes, which only adds to his magisterial aura.
It’s a very reliable and trustworthy North Star, and I dare anyone to find one that makes more sense. Perhaps a talking goat covered in grape jelly.
You’re not the great, knowledgable, stalwart of the Church that you laud yourself as being.
"Great and knowledgeable"? Yeah, right. No, I'm just a regular guy that shows up here to give reason for the faith that resides in me as to the veracity of the restoration narrative/story.
But you don't have faith do you...not sufficient to serve a senior mission. No Celestial Kingdom for you buddy.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
The fact that you suggest the accountability comes after your dead suggests you don’t feel accountable to others whilst you’re alive.
Of course you know that this is not true. Yet you say it anyways.
Regards,
MG
Of course it is accurate. It is exactly what you said and exactly what that suggested to me. My statement is 100% accurate. Now, you may not have meant it exactly as you said it (again) but that isn't my problem, that's yours. If you are now saying you that accountability is in this life, then please explain why you don't feel accountable for what you did to grindael?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.
I don't think you've given a satisfactory answer as of yet.
Maybe it will come...
Regards,
MG
You are misdirecting and not answering the question that I've repeatedly asked you.
Regards,
MG
It appears MG 2.0 is struggling to get a straight answer from himself. Welcome to our world buddy.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
I'm late to the party, because I just was released from prison [not really], but what do you hope to gain from this thread?
Keep reading and you'll find out...
Why don't you do Mormon Stories or Mormon DIscussions or Mormonish?
Identifying as African-American Lesbian who is identifying as a Gay Man and a Gay Journalist
Pronouns: what/me/worry
Rocker and a mocker and a midnight shocker
Well....i wouldn't exactly call his response tactful. Others were, but mentalgymnast's contribution was more along the lines of sexist trolling with a sickening LDS twist:
... freeranger referred to you as “buddy”. Are you a buddy? Even if you’re a female who goes by Marcus?
...What is it you have to offer?
Lemmie=female. Marcus=male.
Perfect, and thank you for providing an outstanding example in showing how MG, Gee, and Muhlestein fail to apply their Church standard and declaration which states: "Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose." (The Family Proclamation)
Mormons don't give a damn about Egyptian gender identity. The Mormons defame the two female characters (goddesses) of Facsimile No. 3 and identify them as males, an earthly king and prince. How wrong is that?!
MG wrote:Lemmie=female. Marcus=male.
Okay then, thus:
Egyptology wrote:Isis=female. Maat=female.
But MG and his bloody cohorts are cowards and hypocrites and liars.
Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?
Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.
Life without or outside Mormonism is better than being a slave to the cult and submitting yourselves to the whims of religious fanatics.
Get the hell out of the cult and learn to enjoy life and live life on your own!
Freedom from the cult is very satisfying in and of itself.
