Physics Guy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 05, 2025 1:17 pm
I don't feel like wagging my finger at any of these people. This evangelical church was showing some kind of film criticising Mormonism from their perspective, and two Mormon apologists showed up in uniform. I'm sure both parties were delighted. They were all consenting adults, and what happened was only what both sides hoped would happen.
I think you’re probably right, Physics Guy, but the trouble is that Professor Peterson doesn’t provide us with information that would allow us to verify what he’s saying. Were the EVs “delighted” that these Mopologetic “white shirts” had somehow found out about and decided to attend this screening? Maybe. Possibly. But we only have a very one-sided and tendentious version of the story.
But hey, I’m sure that, for the faithful readers at SeN, this is clearly a victory for Team Mormon! Add it to the Hitchins File as an example of all the good that Mormonism has done!
Meanwhile, I howled with laughter when I read this:
People who actually know me won’t be surprised to hear that I really, really, really dislike and always try to avoid unpleasant in-person confrontations.
Ha ha! What about *not* “in-person” confrontations, though? Like, say, sending unwelcome emails to people, or showing up uninvited on RfM??
Well, I suppose the best evidence in this case is the ende
Less censorship and banning of critics from his blog. So, yeah: I can see how he’s made an effort to eliminate “unpleasant confrontations.”
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14