Protective order is generally civil - not criminal. And from what I can find on the Garcia case, it was a civil order.
So still no criminal history. Try again.
Protective order is generally civil - not criminal. And from what I can find on the Garcia case, it was a civil order.
Kish, you have not proven anything other that you are married to un-researched social media posts, taken out of context. You just call people names and then double down on things like you did here, a flat out deceptive snippet. I'll give you a chance here to be honest with what you pasted....Kishkumen wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:17 pmYou can try to reason with Markk, but he is impervious to reason. Once he has his teeth into something, he never lets go of it, no matter how many ways and how many times you show him he is wrong. Let's face it, Markk assents to the same kind of "evidence" being used to throw him into a Salvadoran gulag. Baffling I know, but there it is. Markk really doesn't believe in the rule of law. He wants to hand over to unchecked Trump people the identification and ejection of "bad hombres" into inhumane conditions.Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 2:40 pmYes, I'm familiar with those documents. Garcia's "criminal behavior as a MS-13 gang member" is that he wore a Chicago Bulls hat and an anonymous source claimed he belonged to a New York "clique" of MS-13. Garcia has never even lived in New York, but for my money the Bulls hat alone is reason enough to deprive him of his 5th Amendment right to due process. (I mean the Bulls? Seriously?)
That is quite the claim. Markk, can you produce any court documents that actually show Garcia has a criminal history? Move beyond FoxNews and the White House Twitter feed?Markk wrote:Kish, you have not proven anything other that you are married to un-researched social media posts, taken out of context. You just call people names and then double down on things like you did here, a flat out deceptive snippet. I'll give you a chance here to be honest with what you pasted....
His wife declined to pursue a criminal case. According to her, she and her husband went to counseling and were able to work things out.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:07 pmProtective order is generally civil - not criminal. And from what I can find on the Garcia case, it was a civil order.
You can ignore that horns are an MS-13 moniker, but it won't change the truth? It simply is the truth.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:07 pmProtective order is generally civil - not criminal. And from what I can find on the Garcia case, it was a civil order.
So still no criminal history. Try again.
Yes, work out his beating the crap out of her. That violence alone is grounds for deportation, even if he was here with a green card.Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:33 pmHis wife declined to pursue a criminal case. According to her, she and her husband went to counseling and were able to work things out.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:07 pmProtective order is generally civil - not criminal. And from what I can find on the Garcia case, it was a civil order.
I have pasted it I think three times. Are failure to appear a crime?¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:22 pmThat is quite the claim. Markk, can you produce any court documents that actually show Garcia has a criminal history? Move beyond FoxNews and the White House Twitter feed?Markk wrote:Kish, you have not proven anything other that you are married to un-researched social media posts, taken out of context. You just call people names and then double down on things like you did here, a flat out deceptive snippet. I'll give you a chance here to be honest with what you pasted....
as noted, the protective order was civil, not criminal.
Here is the law A.I. referenced.Yes, in Maryland, failing to appear for a traffic citation is a crime, even if a bench warrant hasn't been issued. Specifically, Section 5-212 of the Maryland Criminal Procedure Code outlines that failure to appear in response to a traffic citation is a misdemeanor. While a bench warrant is a likely consequence, it's not the only one.
Did the court rule that he had a protected residency status, Markk?Markk wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:00 pmFocus, it is in context with Garcia having a criminal history, which Kish did not understand. What does not matter in context to what I wrote is that the protective order does not erase his criminal history.canpakes wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:53 pmCongratulations. You’ve reached the point where you’ve started telling people that it doesn’t matter what the law or the courts say, if the government wants to do something different, illegal or unconstitutional.
It’s kind of amazing how easy it is to lead some folks into happily and enthusiastically giving up their civil rights.
Does he have a criminal history Cakes?
Markk can bring the docs. He just can’t interpret them properly.¥akaSteelhead wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:22 pmThat is quite the claim. Markk, can you produce any court documents that actually show Garcia has a criminal history? Move beyond FoxNews and the White House Twitter feed?Markk wrote:Kish, you have not proven anything other that you are married to un-researched social media posts, taken out of context. You just call people names and then double down on things like you did here, a flat out deceptive snippet. I'll give you a chance here to be honest with what you pasted....
as noted, the protective order was civil, not criminal.