Trump is currently President, and US voters need to know whether he was associated with Epstein's teen trafficking.
Yeah, its existence is not limited to one party, and it is unacceptable wherever it does exist. So, by definition, it is a problem that exists in both parties. That said, when you claim that you are out crusading against child abuse and child trafficking, and then it seems like just about every other day there is a new instance of the elected officials and religious leaders of your political party being caught for the very same crime . . . when you undertake to scapegoat trans people for the very crime that your supposedly straight, virtuous "Christian" men are perpetrating, then I say you have asked to have your hypocrisy published everywhere and loudly.Dr Exiled wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:27 pmI think it's a problem with both parties. Epstein seemed to have been busy entrapping a whole host of people in power from perhaps Clinton to Trump. I wonder why certain court documents that contain perpetrator names cannot be unredacted or why these people aren't being prosecuted.
After all, an Epstein victim accused Trump of raping her, and such behavior fits his pattern of behavior. He has a lewd fascination with his own daughter. He liked walking in on young beauty pageant contestants in various stages of undress. The guy is unquestionably a creep. The Epstein thing is just further evidence of the same. I would not be at all surprised if we were to find that he raped teenage girls procured for him by Epstein.Chap wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:02 pmTrump is currently President, and US voters need to know whether he was associated with Epstein's teen trafficking.
In comparison it does not much matter whether anybody from the other party was involved. That would weigh little against knowing that the US has a pedophile president. Release the files now, maybe with victims' information redacted.
It doesn't matter? So, let them continue in their office, continue being compromised? This is why I continue to push the fact that we are governed and have been governed by certain sickos that are in the Epstein files like your Prince Andrew and Clinton and Trump and Gates and probably many others. How about we find out about all the people there, not just one party? Come on, truth over narrative should be the goal, not one sided nonsense.Chap wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:02 pmTrump is currently President, and US voters need to know whether he was associated with Epstein's teen trafficking.
In comparison it does not much matter whether anybody from the other party was involved. That would weigh little against knowing that the US has a pedophile president. Release the files now, maybe with victims' information redacted.
Chap wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:02 pmTrump is currently President, and US voters need to know whether he was associated with Epstein's teen trafficking.
In comparison it does not much matter whether anybody from the other party was involved. That would weigh little against knowing that the US has a pedophile president. Release the files now, maybe with victims' information redacted.
Not at all. Did I say that? But the important question, which outweighs all others, is whether the President of the United States is a pedophile. Name them all, certainly. But knowing about Trump's guilt or innocence is what this is about.
All criminals should be round up. The law should be more important than any president, CEO, Oligarch, etc. I don't know why you think getting Trump as president is more important than looking to see if it has been a cancer on the presidency for some time. There are rumors out there that from at least Clinton to Trump they were all involved in these kinds of activities, allegedly. However, I don't have much faith in finding anything out and this conversation is probably worthless. It would be easy to unredact certain court documents that contain the names of those involved. Making that public and then prosecuting those perps would lead to confession after confession, eventually leading to who were behind Epstein, whether Mossad, CIA, MI6, all of them. But that won't happen, but sure, go after Trump and then maybe through limited disclosure, we'll find out more about the network and the mafia like political parties that govern.Chap wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:49 pmChap wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:02 pmTrump is currently President, and US voters need to know whether he was associated with Epstein's teen trafficking.
In comparison it does not much matter whether anybody from the other party was involved. That would weigh little against knowing that the US has a pedophile president. Release the files now, maybe with victims' information redacted.Not at all. Did I say that? But the important question, which outweighs all others, is whether the President of the United States is a pedophile. Name them all, certainly. But knowing about Trump's guilt or innocence is what this is about.
(On Andrew, by the way - please get him extradited, if there are grounds for doing so, and jail him if he can be proved guilty. You would rid the UK of an embarrassing burden, and the rest of his family would heave a secret sigh of relief.)
Er, yes. But I'd still like to know whether the current President of the United States has been involved in teen trafficking.
Indeed. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but . . . .
Seems as though it would be important to find out if the currently-active President might have an unsavory history in that regard, since Trump has more control over the levers of power than Biden, Obama or Clinton. As it is, it’s peculiar that the Trump Administration has been hiding under desks and making weird whimpering noises whenever the subject of ‘the Epstein files’ comes up. For a fellow such as yourself - having a keen eye for Derp State* shenanigans - this could raise an eyebrow, right?