The Hunted Is Now The Hunter

[Dr Exiled]

The Democrat party is losing voting age men in large numbers due to weak progressive figures like the three representatives in the video, as well as individuals such as Kishkumen, Bishop Schmo, and others who exhibit a similar mindset. https://youtu.be/0RATxRtjGdk?si=RuHUYtcSPRwz5NU9

Men of all skin colors, not just white men, are departing from the Democrat party and seeking refuge within the Republican party. Progressive men seem to have lost their strength and appeal, making them less relatable to the average guy. As a result, today's youth are leaning more towards conservative values than in previous generations.

Regardless of one's opinion on Trump, he has never been seen shedding tears on television, and it is unlikely that he ever will. He embodies strength and honor, whereas contemporary progressive men often appear as weak-minded individuals who readily display their emotions on national television. In the video link, two of the three progressives are visibly emotional on national TV as they express their grievances regarding their treatment. This illustrates why men are turning away from progressivism and discovering fulfillment within the Republican party.

As progressive men express their distress, Trump appears cheerful in interviews, proclaiming that he has transitioned from being the hunted to becoming the hunter. Indeed, he is right! The Democratic party attempted to undermine the man, yet he emerged triumphant.

Progressives seem to be under the impression that the riots we are witnessing are a demonstration of the strength of their movement. In reality, the riots are merely supplying the Republicans with additional evidence to demonstrate that the Democratic Party has been overtaken by the radical left wing. The individuals attending these rallies do not embody the qualities of true strength and masculinity. The individuals attending these rallies are perceived as lacking strength of character, leading to disdain from their peers. They carry small signs crafted during their time at the kitchen table. They wear large-brimmed hats to shield their faces from the sun during the protest, as they fear the risk of developing skin cancer while advocating for their cause. Their entire demeanor appears to be feeble, lacking strength and failing to inspire men.

What we are witnessing is the decline of the Democrat party, as a group of timid individuals permitted a less capable faction to seize control due to their fear of being labeled. Now, men of all ages and backgrounds are seeking a place where they can express their masculinity without facing derogatory labels simply for being men.

Trump is right; he has become the hunter, and men admire him for standing up against the progressives. Men now recognize that progressive men exhibit weakness, and that embracing progressivism often involves a struggle with self-acceptance. The dynamics have shifted for progressives, and men are beginning to embrace their masculinity once more, largely due to the influence of one individual, Donald Trump!

Kishkumen is NOT a Democrat. Pay attention already.

Didn't he say that he is an independent but always votes democrat because the republicans in his area are looney or something to that effect? I guess after a while of voting for democrats over and over again, might as well go all in and admit that the independence isn't that independent?

[Dr Exiled]

Here is an article that covers the issue pretty well:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/0 ... y-00384370

I think the focus on race, sex and gender should give way to economic issues - it's the economy stupid, as the 1992 Clinton campaign told us. That will appeal to the young men that are following Joe Rogan and the like. The donor class wants us fighting with each other so we don't look too closely at how they are continually transferring wealth upward.

https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-in ... y-america/

https://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct23/we ... 10-23.html

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Do you have a woman?

- Doc

How do you define a woman? It seems that many contributors on this board struggle to articulate the definition of a woman. Perhaps it would be beneficial for someone to clarify that before I respond to your question.

Dude. Lol. You don’t need to say another word. We get it. Maybe if you go to one of those man-lectures you’ll figure out how to sit and open water bottles that’ll make you more attractive to girls who are virgins and just want to make babies, as God demands? Breakdown for those interested:

https://youtu.be/LQoMNg4qFyc?si=_doS5J8yLJShad8C

- Doc

[canpakes]

While Hound is busy portraying Young Republican Men as angry, butthurt incels who cannot define what a woman is, he might consider that one of the more influential voices amongst young men is voicing his opposition to our deepening involvement in MidEast war.

[Gadianton]

Note that on the other thread, which I have not opened yet, progressives are labeled as violent. Violence, best associated with war and wielding power, is a masculine quality, whether one approves or not. Whatever else he wishes to convey, he’s affirming liberal men are masculine.

[huckelberry]

Note that on the other thread, which I have not opened yet, progressives are labeled as violent. Violence, best associated with war and wielding power, is a masculine quality, whether one approves or not. Whatever else he wishes to convey, he’s affirming liberal men are masculine.

Gad, the other thread features some women demonstrators getting angry with a woman questioning them.

[canpakes]

Note that on the other thread, which I have not opened yet, progressives are labeled as violent. Violence, best associated with war and wielding power, is a masculine quality, whether one approves or not. Whatever else he wishes to convey, he’s affirming liberal men are masculine.

Gad,the other thread features some women demonstrators getting angry with a woman questioning them.

Maybe this is demonstrating that liberal women are stronger than MAGA men. Certainly more so than the greased-up wreck posing as our Secretary of Defense.



This may also explain why Hound keeps asking what women are.

[Gadianton]

Hound, Laura Ingraham makes millions of dollars every year. She's never been married. She has adopted kids. Does she need a man? Has she been taking orders from progressives?

[Hound of Heaven]

Hound, Laura Ingraham makes millions of dollars every year. She's never been married. She has adopted kids. Does she need a man? Has she been taking orders from progressives?

Yes she needs plenty of men. If she owns a car, she needs a man at some point. If she owns a house, at some point she'll need a man. If she drives on roads, at some point she'll need a man. If she relies on cell service, at some point she'll need a man. If she consumes food, she needs a man. If she enjoys electricity she needs a man. If she enjoys the benefits of central A/C she needs a man.

Do you need me to continue?

You just don't understand the world we live in, do you?